Re: design problem when installing base system

2001-04-09 Thread Anthony Towns
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 09:32:57PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Good point. I haven't look at how debootstrap handles this situation. In any > > case the problem should be fixed with debootstrap rather than having > > boot-floppies hack around it, sin

Re: design problem when installing base system

2001-04-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good point. I haven't look at how debootstrap handles this situation. In any > case the problem should be fixed with debootstrap rather than having > boot-floppies hack around it, since debootstrap is a generally useful tool. Ah, I love that. Fewer pl

Re: design problem when installing base system

2001-04-09 Thread David Whedon
Good point. I haven't look at how debootstrap handles this situation. In any case the problem should be fixed with debootstrap rather than having boot-floppies hack around it, since debootstrap is a generally useful tool. I'll take a look at debootstrap. David Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 06:44:24PM

Re: design problem when installing base system

2001-04-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the user who has two sets of packages will allways end up with > the newer one. > > we need to > - remember what he wanted to install and have a list which > packages belong to his choice > *OR* > - erase the archive/ directory on every instal