On Wed, 26 May 2010, Stephen Powell wrote:
> You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
> is that Linux is free. If they have to buy new backup software
> in order to accommodate Linux' backup requirements, that will
> kill it on the spot. Whatever boot loader I use must not
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: zlinux...@wowway.com
>To: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-u...@lists.debian.org,
>debian-boot@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: Re (2): lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test
>grub2")
>Date: Tue, 25 May 2010
On Tue, 25 May 2010 12:03:17 -0400 (EDT), Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>>
>> You're missing the point. The main selling point to management
>> is that Linux is free.
>
> No software is entirely without cost. Free Software is no exception. There
> are usually no up-fro
On Tue, 25 May 2010 11:51:11 -0400 (EDT), Mark
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:29:54 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
>>> Stephen Powell wrote:
(3) The need for special backup requirements will be
used by the opponents of Linux at my p
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:29:54 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> > Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> (3) The need for special backup requirements will be
> >> used by the opponents of Linux at my place of employment
> >> to oppose further deployme
On Mon, 24 May 2010 17:29:54 -0400 (EDT), Peter Easthope wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> (3) The need for special backup requirements will be
>> used by the opponents of Linux at my place of employment
>> to oppose further deployments of Linux, ...
>
> What about the carrot approach? Find an
6 matches
Mail list logo
