Re: Red X -- was: Re: new oldworld pmac miboot 2.6 floppies, root size should be ok, net_drivers still too big, please test.

On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 01:58:34AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: Sven Luther wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: Is it possible the objcopy is corrupting it? This is indeed a possibility. I will disable this again for the 2.4 floppies, and we will see tomorrow what happens. That said,

Red X -- was: Re: new oldworld pmac miboot 2.6 floppies, root size should be ok, net_drivers still too big, please test.

I tried the new 2.4 PowerMac floppys today. Now I get the Red X on the 2.4 boot floppy as well. I did an experiment... I mounted the 2.4 boot floppy and extracted the zImage file, uncompressed it, and compared it to the 2.4.25-powerpc-small kernel. They both claim to be the same kernel in that

Re: Red X -- was: Re: new oldworld pmac miboot 2.6 floppies, root size should be ok, net_drivers still too big, please test.

On Sunday, August 29, 2004, at 04:31 AM, Rick_Thomas wrote: I tried the new 2.4 PowerMac floppys today. Now I get the Red X on the 2.4 boot floppy as well. I did an experiment... I mounted the 2.4 boot floppy and extracted the zImage file, uncompressed it, and compared it to the

Re: Red X -- was: Re: new oldworld pmac miboot 2.6 floppies, root size should be ok, net_drivers still too big, please test.

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:03:42AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: On Sunday, August 29, 2004, at 04:31 AM, Rick_Thomas wrote: I tried the new 2.4 PowerMac floppys today. Now I get the Red X on the 2.4 boot floppy as well. I did an experiment... I mounted the 2.4 boot floppy and extracted

Re: Red X -- was: Re: new oldworld pmac miboot 2.6 floppies, root size should be ok, net_drivers still too big, please test.

Sven Luther wrote: Rick Thomas wrote: Is it possible the objcopy is corrupting it? This is indeed a possibility. I will disable this again for the 2.4 floppies, and we will see tomorrow what happens. That said, the 2.6 floppies are too big to work with miboot without the objcopy -O