Hi Dave,
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 18:33, Dave Beckett wrote:
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
The patch below adds the correct line to the shlibs file in the lib
package so that
On 6/14/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
If any powerpc people care, I build both 1.1.6 and
On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or are you refering to the fact that the package is new in experimental?
It's not new yet. I'm waiting for somebody here to tell me to upload it -
and whether to set it for experimental or unstable.
I will build it for powerpc and see if
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:55:53AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/13/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or are you refering to the fact that the package is new in
experimental?
It's not new yet. I'm waiting for somebody here to tell me to upload it
-
and whether to set it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
Dave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
Hi Dave,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:33:30AM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
Cairo 1.1.8 snapshot was just released so I've made a new set of
experimental debs for it at:
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
I performed the very same tests run with the 1.1.6:
- built an image of the
On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
It's in the same place as the other
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
It's in the
On 6/13/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/12/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't forget as there are new deb packages here, there's at least a
month to
wait for the NEW queue to process them before you can use them after I
upload them to debian.
Last night I sent the following message which probably did
not get through because of the 90Kb attachement.
Sorry if this is the second time you rereceive this.
The patch is now available in [1].
regards,
Davide
[1] http://www.webalice.it/zinosat/gtk+-directfb_2.8.17.patch.gz
Davide Viti wrote:
Last night I sent the following message which probably did
not get through because of the 90Kb attachement.
Sorry if this is the second time you rereceive this.
The patch is now available in [1].
snip
i tested the updated patchfile and it's ok for me too, now the last two
I've made another cairo 1.1.6-1 experimental deb set, this time there's a
new libcairo2-directfb-dev which can be parallel installed with the
libcairo2-dev and answers to 'pkgconfig cairo-directfb --libs' etc.
It's in the same place as the other packages:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 09:25:49AM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files differ.
Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files differ.
Davide
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files differ.
Say what? The source
Say what? The source is the same...
But compiled with different flags
that's what I said about three mails ago.
Then what you said three mails ago is wrong.
AFAICT there shouldn't be any difference
beween the headers because they are the same headers. Are there any?
Have you checked
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 10:51:05AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed, there is no need for two -dev packages, is there?
Why would you force ppl interested only in the x11 version to install
the directfb one as well?
Only two pc files
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Say what? The source is the same...
But compiled with different flags
that's what I said about three mails ago.
Then what you said three mails ago is wrong.
I was asking then if they were the same... and nobody said that I was
wrong about
Have you checked it before stating they're the same?
I don't have access to a linux machine now to test that. Have
you checked?
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You don't need a linux machine to check that; grab the -dev.deb and
-dev.udeb in the link
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
You don't need a linux machine to check that; grab the -dev.deb and
-dev.udeb in the link provided by Dave.
Ok,
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to:
Only two pc files and two libs, right?
No: include files
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/06, Viti Davide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think I would have said that without having checked before?
You haven't made it easy to let us understand that you did.
Here's a snippet of the message you're referring to:
Only two pc
I've rebuilt the packaging of cairo 1.1.6-1 at
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
to include a libcairo2-directfb-udeb-dev package
Please give it a test
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 08 June 2006 08:03, Dave Beckett wrote:
to include a libcairo2-directfb-udeb-dev package
Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here:
- the -dev package is needed when _building_ other udebs that use the
libcairo-directfb libs
- so, the -dev package isn't a udeb and will
Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here:
[snip]
I think that also means that we are still missing one other package as
AFAIK a -dev package normally depends on a corresponding regular library
package. That would mean a package: libcairo2-directfb_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
Indeed.
So, we'd
The regular and -directfb lib and -dev packages would need to be
co-installable on a regular Debian system.
Sorry if we did not make this clear enough.
Cheers,
FJP
(Anybody please correct me if any of this is incorrect!)
That's excatly what I was about to write;
I'll rephrase it
I could have made it even simpler by saying that
libcairo2-directfb-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb
Is the same as libcairo2-dev_1.1.6-1_i386.deb apart the compilation
flags which select
The directfb backend.
Davide
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 12:22:00PM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
The regular and -directfb lib and -dev packages would need to be
co-installable on a regular Debian system.
Sorry if we did not make this clear enough.
Cheers,
FJP
(Anybody please correct me if any of this is
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:11:38PM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
Hi Sven,
Don't we need also a -fPIC version of the library, in order
to the mklibs reduction ?
Yes we do, but I'd play safe and leave it as next step.
Getting out working (u)debs asap would means we could start
Pushing for
Hi Sven,
Don't we need also a -fPIC version of the library, in order
to the mklibs reduction ?
Yes we do, but I'd play safe and leave it as next step.
Getting out working (u)debs asap would means we could start
Pushing for the gtk+directf set of packages.
Just my 2 cents
Davide
Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 08 June 2006 08:03, Dave Beckett wrote:
to include a libcairo2-directfb-udeb-dev package
Hmm. There seems to be some misunderstanding here:
- the -dev package is needed when _building_ other udebs that use the
libcairo-directfb libs
- so, the -dev package
On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The regular and -directfb lib and -dev packages would need to be
co-installable on a regular Debian system.
That's not possible since both -dev packages have to provide the same file
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc and conflict, so that 'pkgconfig
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The regular and -directfb lib and -dev packages would need to be
co-installable on a regular Debian system.
That's not possible since both -dev packages have to provide the same
file
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/cairo.pc and
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:29:03PM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
yes this change could be made, but this would require a patch to be made to
gtk+2.0-directfb (udeb)'s configure to use pkgconfig cairo-directfb rather
than pkgconfig cairo. Is that correct?
It is correct.
gtk+2.0-directfb (2.8.17)
On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/8/06, Dave Beckett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The regular and -directfb lib and -dev packages would need to be
co-installable on a regular Debian system.
That's not possible since both -dev packages have to provide
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Hmm, thining again at the problem...
We are using now the same source for building the -directfb and the
regular cairo, right?
yes
The compilation of the libs is made from exactly the same code, but is
just configured
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:20:37PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Hmm, thining again at the problem...
We are using now the same source for building the -directfb and the
regular cairo, right?
yes
The compilation of the libs
On 6/9/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:20:37PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:10:41AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Hmm, thining again at the problem...
We are using now the same source for building the -directfb and the
regular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6 experimental
along with udebs just against directfb. The result is sitting in
http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I can't
Hi Dave,
To build the -directfb-dev package you can use the following options:
--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes
As soon as you've something ready to test, I'll use it to try and compile
the gtk+-directfb_2.8.17 packages, which is the last bit of the endless
stack
Hey Dave,
In the meanwhile I can test your udeb.
Good news: I've run some tests and looks like the udeb is working fine!!
I grabbed a g-i image [1] created by Attilio and based on recent libs,
unpacked the initrd.gz file contained in the iso into a directory; I then
replaced the libcairo files
Hi Dave,
I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6
experimental along with udebs just against directfb. The
result is sitting in http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I
can't test the udeb.
Let me know if
Davide Viti wrote:
Hi Dave,
To build the -directfb-dev package you can use the following options:
--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes
one strange thing i noticed with GTK 2.9.x only (2.8.17 is not affected)
is that it requires cairo to be built with both pdf and
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:32:26PM +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes
one strange thing i noticed with GTK 2.9.x only (2.8.17 is not affected)
is that it requires cairo to be built with both pdf and ps backends
enabled (maybe
Davide Viti wrote:
Hey Dave,
In the meanwhile I can test your udeb.
Good news: I've run some tests and looks like the udeb is working fine!!
I grabbed a g-i image [1] created by Attilio and based on recent libs,
unpacked the initrd.gz file contained in the iso into a directory; I then
Viti Davide wrote:
Hi Dave,
I've repackaged cairo completely and built cairo 1.1.6
experimental along with udebs just against directfb. The
result is sitting in http://download.dajobe.org/debian/experimental/
for now. I tested that the regular debs seem to work but I
can't test the
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 09:12:59AM -0700, Dave Beckett wrote:
I took the package description from the Source: libcairo-directfb
debian/control and there was no such libcairo2-directfb-dev in there.
I think it's because old gtk+ libs did not need cairo which was introduced
later on;
Can't
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Davide Viti wrote:
Hi Dave,
To build the -directfb-dev package you can use the following options:
--disable-xlib --disable-ps --disable-pdf --enable-directfb=yes
one strange thing i noticed with GTK 2.9.x only (2.8.17 is not affected)
is that it requires cairo to
Hi Dave,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:37, Dave Beckett wrote:
I can try to build one in a few days time but I'm unsure how I could
test it (in isolation) as I'm not familiar with udebs.
If you can provide a udeb, we can at least check its contents and I'm sure
that one of us will be able to test
On 6/6/06, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:37, Dave Beckett wrote:
I can try to build one in a few days time but I'm unsure how I could
test it (in isolation) as I'm not familiar with udebs.
If you can provide a udeb, we can at least check its contents
On 6/6/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most important for us is that the libs in the udeb are built against only
the directfb backend and not e.g. the X backend.
That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
build in separate directories. I have a rough
Frans Pop wrote:
Hi Dave,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 00:37, Dave Beckett wrote:
I can try to build one in a few days time but I'm unsure how I could
test it (in isolation) as I'm not familiar with udebs.
If you can provide a udeb, we can at least check its contents and I'm sure
that one of us
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/6/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most important for us is that the libs in the udeb are built against
only
the directfb backend and not e.g. the X backend.
That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
build in separate
Dave Beckett wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/6/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most important for us is that the libs in the udeb are built against
only
the directfb backend and not e.g. the X backend.
That will imply 2 builds of the cairo sources with the results of each
Dave Beckett wrote:
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
The graphical frontend to the debian-installer is now part of standard
daily builds and we're ready to switch to standard GTK+ and Cairo
libraries in their DFB version (a patch to add the DFB backend to
standard GTK+ 2.8.17 was already provided).
Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
The graphical frontend to the debian-installer is now part of standard
daily builds and we're ready to switch to standard GTK+ and Cairo
libraries in their DFB version (a patch to add the DFB backend to
standard GTK+ 2.8.17 was already provided).
We're curretly
Hi Dave
this time no librdf business.. :)
The graphical frontend to the debian-installer is now part of standard
daily builds and we're ready to switch to standard GTK+ and Cairo
libraries in their DFB version (a patch to add the DFB backend to
standard GTK+ 2.8.17 was already provided).
We're
57 matches
Mail list logo
