On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:32:36AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > current open issues (please add if you know more):
> > > - bcm43xx ?backports?
> > > - hp amd64 acpi blacklists
> > I don't see any follow-ups from anyone adding more. How about these two
> > issues in particular -- is there
heya,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:38:38PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:36:32AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > - mm alternative msync() fix
this is beeing tested for lsb compliance,
once there is an ok for it, i
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:36:32AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> quick update on current linux-2.6 state.
Thanks for this.
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
> > version, with the following changes:
> > 1. new
hi,
quick update on current linux-2.6 state.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
> version, with the following changes:
>
> 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
> 2. new Xen patch
> 3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, bre
On Thursday 21 December 2006 12:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Yes, TTBOMK these packages could be binNMUed for a *silent* ABI change.
> For an ABI change expressed in the package name, they would all need
> sourceful uploads.
For d-i release management I'd actually prefer an ABI change for loop-aes
* Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-21 03:01]:
> If the kernel team has decided to push forward with the ABI changes
> (I don't know if this is the case, I haven't seen much response to
> my message on-list?), it would certainly be better to get started on
> this sooner rather than later.
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> > The first two ABI changes are specific to extra kernel flavors that
> > aren't relevant to the installer and have few (if any?) extra modules
> > built for them.
> Actually, quite a few modules packages are being built for the
> vse
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Frederik Schueler wrote:
> [...]
> > The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
>
> Is there a new schedule already?
>
> Norbert
waiting for the upstream mm fix..
or in the improbable
* Frederik Schueler wrote:
[...]
> The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
Is there a new schedule already?
Norbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:53:03PM +0100, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might
> > > be a
Hi all,
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:43:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > This update bears 3 ABI breaking changes. While the vserver patch might
> > be adaptable, the PAE migration of i386 Xen is not. But we need this
> > chan
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:32:54PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot=20
> > wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
> > discuss them.
> The 2.6.18.6 stable series
Hi Frederik,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
> version, with the following changes:
> 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
> 2. new Xen patch
> 3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI
> 4. a
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot=20
> wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
> discuss them.
The 2.6.18.6 stable series patches posted by Chris include some fixes
we should include:
- fixes data co
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:19:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> >
> > If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot
> > wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
> >
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot
> wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
> discuss them.
- 2.6.16.X backports that are missing in 2.6.18.
- latest 2.
On Friday 15 December 2006 18:08, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Question towards the boot and release teams: is this OK with you? I
> know this means a further delay of etch because of another round of
> udebs and various changes in the installer configs, but the Xen issue
> is odd and really needs a
Hello,
I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
version, with the following changes:
1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
2. new Xen patch
3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, breaks ABI
4. arm changes
5. 2.6.18.5 ABI breaking patch (Honour source routing for LVS-NAT)
This up
18 matches
Mail list logo
