Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:23:34AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:26, Ben Collins wrote: > > > > Hmm... Why don't we just use parted for now, until a better solution > > > comes around? It's in the archive, and AFAICT supports Sparc. (ia64 > > > uses it right now, too) >

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 11:26, Ben Collins wrote: > > Hmm... Why don't we just use parted for now, until a better solution > > comes around? It's in the archive, and AFAICT supports Sparc. (ia64 > > uses it right now, too) > I know it supports sparc. I worked a long time ago to get the sun > par

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:58:23PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:14:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:14:50PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: > > > > > > > > I also remember (wa

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 11:26:06AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: > > > > > > I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the > > > > fdisk udeb wa

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:21:18AM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: > > > > I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the > > > fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the > > > whole p

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 04:22:34PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote: > > I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the > > fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the > > whole partman thing will make this silently go away before we get there. > >

Re: Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Thomas Poindessous
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:34:06AM -0500, Jeff Bailey wrote: > I also remember (was it Thomas? Blars? hmmm...) mentioning that the > fdisk udeb wasn't getting loaded for some reason. I'm hoping that the > whole partman thing will make this silently go away before we get there. in fact, there is

Sparc d-i status

2004-02-24 Thread Jeff Bailey
May as well post one of these, too. =) Nightly builds are happening so sparc32-tftp, sparc64-tftp, and miniiso. These don't generally work, though. #232720 is our major blocker for tftpbooting, there's a patch in the BTS that the maintainer is reviewing (Thanks James!) That bug will also affe