Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #1056018 [src:partman-base] partman-base: parted_devices hangs with process
in D state during Debian installer Detect Disks step
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
1056018: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
Olivier F. R. Dierick (2023-11-16):
> Justification: breaks the whole system
Not being able to install doesn't “break the whole system”. This is a
showstopper in the installation process in your case indeed, but that's
not what this severity is for.
>
Source: partman-base
Version: 226
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Updating from Debian 8 to Debian 12 from an USB stick.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
/the loading and booting of Debian still has a lot of room for improvement./
Frans Pop wrote:
On Saturday 30 December 2006 19:04, Geert Stappers wrote:
But what value is in that message with expired dates?
The value is in the So where do we go next? bit, which reflects current
archive implies I read all mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
| ## and I expect contributors to read also _all_ mails to the list )
| Current development state is {{{less deep freeze}}}, we are preparing Etch RC2
What is a more correct description of the state of debian-installer ?
Geert Stappers
In another
also _all_
| mails to the list ) Current development state is {{{less deep
| freeze}}}, we are preparing Etch RC2
What is a more correct description of the state of debian-installer ?
How should people interpret less deep freeze? What does that add?
Maintaining a status on the wiki is only
Howabout if somebody volunteered (Geert?) to, on (say) a weekly
basis, cut and paste the latest of Franz' status reports from the
debian-boot mailing list into the wiki page?
would that work?
Rick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Op 30-12-2006 om 09:57 schreef Rick Thomas:
Howabout if somebody volunteered (Geert?) to, on (say) a weekly
basis, cut and paste the latest of Franz' status reports from the
debian-boot mailing list into the wiki page?
would that work?
I'm willing to find that out, the state was just
Op 30-12-2006 om 14:15 schreef Frans Pop:
Maintaining a status on the wiki is only useful if it is actively
maintained by someone who (1) knows when the status changes and (2) can
accurately describe the status.
My personal opinion is that maintaining a status on the wiki is redundant,
On Saturday 30 December 2006 17:55, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm willing to find that out, the state was just updated
with a pointer to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/12/msg01492.html
Then also please link to my message Re: D-I RC1 - release planning -
update - freeze over, restrained
Op 30-12-2006 om 18:24 schreef Frans Pop:
On Saturday 30 December 2006 17:55, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm willing to find that out, the state was just updated
with a pointer to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/12/msg01492.html
Then also please link to my message Re: D-I RC1 -
On Saturday 30 December 2006 19:04, Geert Stappers wrote:
But what value is in that message with expired dates?
The value is in the So where do we go next? bit, which reflects current
status.
pgpnJf3sUOSFB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Op 30-12-2006 om 19:33 schreef Frans Pop:
On Saturday 30 December 2006 19:04, Geert Stappers wrote:
But what value is in that message with expired dates?
The value is in the So where do we go next? bit,
which reflects current status.
Wiki updated with that information.
Thanks
Geert
13 matches
Mail list logo
