Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-27 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi folks, Cyril Brulebois (02/01/2013): > Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to > graphical installer by default? it's been a while (and I'm quite unhappy to have been kept busy on other things), but I think I might consider this change for a possible

Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-03 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
Em 03-01-2013 01:27, Steve McIntyre escreveu: [...] None here, we could/should have done it a while back IMO. +1 -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list

Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bob Proulx, le Wed 02 Jan 2013 22:51:56 -0700, a écrit : > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to > > graphical installer by default? > > Can I at least say that I don't like the mouse installer and much > prefer th

Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-02 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Bob Proulx (b...@proulx.com): > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to > > graphical installer by default? > > Can I at least say that I don't like the mouse installer and much > prefer the standard keyboa

Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-02 Thread Bob Proulx
Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to > graphical installer by default? Can I at least say that I don't like the mouse installer and much prefer the standard keyboard one? I don't have any issues with it. I just don

Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-02 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Steve McIntyre (st...@einval.com): > >Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to > >graphical installer by default? > > None here, we could/should have done it a while back IMO. The only reason I know is that D-I development was really hosed

Re: Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-02 Thread Steve McIntyre
972. >> >> This is not needed for RC1, unless we make the graphical installer the >> default. > >I'm planning to merge that one for rc1. > >Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to >graphical installer by default? None here, we co

Switching to graphical installer by default?

2013-01-02 Thread Cyril Brulebois
RC1, unless we make the graphical installer the > default. I'm planning to merge that one for rc1. Also, is there anyone aware of any reasons against switching to graphical installer by default? Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature