Re: Towards X11-based d-i: v2, progress report

2010-02-26 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Frans Pop (26/02/2010): > I chose -gtk as it will be used with the gtk frontend and is > consistent with e.g. rootskel-gtk. But other names are certainly > possible and the final name will need to be agreed with Marco. Sure. :) > >That means fewer udebs to add (although libxfixes3 is still >

Re: Towards X11-based d-i: v2, progress report

2010-02-26 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 25 February 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > * udev: The previous patch set wasn't really good indeed. [...] >(I'm not sure we should name it udev-gtk-udeb since >there's nothing gtk-related in there, it'd rather be X11-related, >but frankly, I don't care. :)) I chose -gtk

Towards X11-based d-i: v2, progress report

2010-02-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi folks. Sorry, no patches, sources, or udebs, at least for now. (Yes, this is a teaser; booh, bad bad bad KiBi.) I just wanted to keep you posted about my latest hacks. Please note the following numbers are based on my IRC backlog between successive builds, so they might not be the exact figur