2014/08/18 14:57 Christopher Chavez 2000...@gmail.com:
(Please let me know if there's a better venue for collecting feedback for
this
idea, or additional ones I should solicit feedback from. I primarily use
Ubuntu,
but I assume this is as upstream as it gets.)
Upstream relative to what? Boot
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:45:03PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
2014/08/18 14:57 Christopher Chavez 2000...@gmail.com:
Questions:
1. Is it the case that the only reason for having a separate /boot was to
provide easy access /boot/grub? I.e., was it intentional to provide easy
access
to
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:40:13AM -0500, Christopher Chavez wrote:
2. Would it be a better idea to only have /boot/grub, instead of /boot, on a
separate partition? (I can confirm that it works both when installing and in
existing setups, i.e. grub-install and update-grub both work as
On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 00:40 -0500, Christopher Chavez wrote:
(Please let me know if there's a better venue for collecting feedback for this
idea, or additional ones I should solicit feedback from. I primarily use
Ubuntu,
but I assume this is as upstream as it gets.)
Background:
It has
(Please let me know if there's a better venue for collecting feedback for this
idea, or additional ones I should solicit feedback from. I primarily use Ubuntu,
but I assume this is as upstream as it gets.)
Background:
It has been discussed (in other venues) where a separate /boot partition (e.g.
5 matches
Mail list logo
