Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
David Whedon wrote: > I don't have strong feelings, and in fact I had to bend over backwards to make > the volatile stable, testing names work in a somewhat sane way. So do we want de > bootstrap to accept 2.1/2.3/2.3 as well as slink/potato/woody ? Perhaps 3 symli > nks in /usr/lib/debootstrap/s

Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread David Whedon
> This will certianly work, but I still don't understand why that code is > so fond of the release names, when with a simple change to debootstrap, it The code is fond of release names because : 1 - that's what debootstrap wanted 2 - that is a common way of talking about releases, which is probb

Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
David Whedon wrote: > slink and sid will never change, their proper names are just that, slink and > sid. I would argue that their proper names are "2.1" and "unstable". > Once woody is released someone installing potato will also want that name > to not change, it will just stay 'potato'. Or "

Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Matt Kraai wrote: > Argh. This is my fault. When I added support for preserving the > suite information, I didn't think to update the different > possibilities for apt-get/distribution. As a temporary > workaround, you can manually edit /target/root/dbootstrap_settings > to set SUITE to unstabl

Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Hirst
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:30:36PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:04:10PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: > > This is on hppa, base-config 1.04 (built myself), debconf 0.9.64. > > I'm doing an unstable install, and /root/dbootstrap_settings ends up > > containing SUITE='sid' a

Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread David Whedon
> I guess the correct solution is to make dbootstrap write unstable > instead of sid, but I don't know how to handle slink and potato. > Suggestions? Here is an idea: slink and sid will never change, their proper names are just that, slink and sid. Once woody is released someone installing pota

Re: base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:04:10PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: > This is on hppa, base-config 1.04 (built myself), debconf 0.9.64. > I'm doing an unstable install, and /root/dbootstrap_settings ends up > containing SUITE='sid' as expected. base-config was trying to use > stable, so I editted 00

base-config/00dbootstrap_settings failure

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Hirst
Hi, This is on hppa, base-config 1.04 (built myself), debconf 0.9.64. I'm doing an unstable install, and /root/dbootstrap_settings ends up containing SUITE='sid' as expected. base-config was trying to use stable, so I editted 00dbootstrap_settings to run with -x rather than -e to see what was h