Hi.
I'm sorry it has taken a while to write back to you. I asked how the TC
could help and was confused when I read your message. I provided a
couple of options how we might be able to help and you neither selected
one of my options nor provided your own. So, I wasn't sure what you
were looki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
06.03.2015 15:02, Sam Hartman wrote:
[]
> So, you're involving the TC because you're hoping to better understand why
> your unblock was not approved?
>
> How are you hoping the TC can help? Here are some options I see:
>
> * Some folks on the TC ar
>However, I still really want to understand that unknown reason
>why all this happened, why it is so difficult to accept a
>working package than to do more bastardizing work, why it is
>smart to reject good stuff and to do absolutely unnecessary work
>(double work with maintaining 2 version and a
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 01:38:29PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> But once I
> uploaded a next release of busybox to the archive, it was rebuilt
> using older, unfixed glibc, and the original problem reappeared.
I didn't see any request to make sure the chroots are updated.
Not having read the wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
05.03.2015 15:08, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> "Adam" == Adam D Barratt writes:
>
> Adam> Hi, Making no comment on the remainder of the mail:
>
> Adam> On 2015-03-05 10:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> And since I can't do my work, I'm stepping down from
Hi,
Bah, so much for a quick response that I thought was simple and
uncontroversial. :-)
On 2015-03-05 12:08, Sam Hartman wrote:
Adam, let's assume for the moment I've got that right. I'm trying to
connect with the frustration I'd feel if I were told that I didn't even
have the power to dist
> "Adam" == Adam D Barratt writes:
Adam> Hi, Making no comment on the remainder of the mail:
Adam> On 2015-03-05 10:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> And since I can't do my work, I'm stepping down from being
>> busybox maintainer, and am kindly asking the release team to
>>
Hi,
Making no comment on the remainder of the mail:
On 2015-03-05 10:38, Michael Tokarev wrote:
And since I can't do my work, I'm stepping down from being
busybox maintainer, and am kindly asking the release team
to remove my name from debian/control file in busybox, so
that people don't blame
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I didn't really want to write this email, but it looks I now have to,
even if, for reasons which whill be shown below, don't expect any
good news from this.
Trying to make the story short.
For quite some time we had a bug in glibc in jessie w
9 matches
Mail list logo
