Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update

2004-01-25 Thread Pedro M.
- Original Message - From: Andrew Pollock [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 11:07 AM Subject: Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:30:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote

Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update

2004-01-24 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:30:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: [snippage] I'm coming into this thread uberlate so feel free to flame me for talking uninformed but... Two points: - I don't believe that new Linux users trying to dual-boot Windows and Linux are the primary audience that

Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update

2004-01-08 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:30:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: - I don't believe that new Linux users trying to dual-boot Windows and Linux are the primary audience that the installer has to cater to. They're important, but I think that Debian in particular has tended to be better at

Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update

2004-01-08 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op do 08-01-2004, om 17:13 schreef Steve Langasek: On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:33:41AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:30:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: - I don't believe that new Linux users trying to dual-boot Windows and Linux are the primary audience that

Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update

2004-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:33:41AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:30:30PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: - I don't believe that new Linux users trying to dual-boot Windows and Linux are the primary audience that the installer has to cater to. They're important,

Re: Make the system bootable, was: beta 2 update

2004-01-07 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:47:01PM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote: I keep thinking about the boot loader point in d-i. There were several points in previous discussions (references see below) with different points of view. I would like to collect this here along with my thougts. Currently

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Joey Hess] Are you talking about the reported freeze in serial console after languagechooser, or just a general, non-user-visible cleanup? I am talking about a general non-user-visible cleanup, to make sure kbd-chooser, lilo-installer, grub-installer (and possibly other packages) use common

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Harald Dunkel
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Joey Hess] Are you talking about the reported freeze in serial console after languagechooser, or just a general, non-user-visible cleanup? I am talking about a general non-user-visible cleanup, to make sure kbd-chooser, lilo-installer, grub-installer (and possibly

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Harald Dunkel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): grub-installer? You mean d-i supports grub? Sure I have never seen this option at installation time. How can I avoid Lilo in favour of Grub? Lower debconf priority and the boot loader installation entries will show up on main-menu. lilo is still

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread James J. Ramsey
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James J. Ramsey wrote: I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still doesn't work with older ATAPI CD-ROMs that can't handle DMA, since 1) the standard kernel parameter ide=nodma gets mysteriously ignored by the installer, There is nothing

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
James J. Ramsey wrote: The documentation on expert mode in the INSTALLATION-HOWTO is a little thin, but you *seem* to be saying that just to turn off DMA for the CD-ROM, I have resort to avoid using Debian's hardware detection and load the modules manually with modconf. I *hope* you aren't

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Your comment about freezing the udebs in unstable made me conclude that I would be unable to get these fixes into d-i before the sarge release. Must be a misunderstanding then. The udebs are frozen in testing for beta 2. When beta 3 is ready, it will replace all the

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Harald Dunkel
Christian Perrier wrote: Lower debconf priority and the boot loader installation entries will show up on main-menu. Wouldn't you admit that this is _very_ hard to find? lilo is still the default boot loader (no idea whether this is supposed to change) but grub is definitely a possible choice. I

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:16:39PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: Christian Perrier wrote: Lower debconf priority and the boot loader installation entries will show up on main-menu. Wouldn't you admit that this is _very_ hard to find? Do you really think that choosing a bootloader should be a

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread James J. Ramsey
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: James J. Ramsey wrote: The documentation on expert mode in the INSTALLATION-HOWTO is a little thin, but you *seem* to be saying that just to turn off DMA for the CD-ROM, I have resort to avoid using Debian's hardware detection and load the

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Harald Dunkel
Steve Langasek wrote: On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:16:39PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: Christian Perrier wrote: Lower debconf priority and the boot loader installation entries will show up on main-menu. Wouldn't you admit that this is _very_ hard to find? Do you really think that choosing a

How much autodetection does the expert install do? (was Re: beta 2 update)

2004-01-05 Thread James J. Ramsey
I was advised that to workaround my pet problem of my CD-ROM's broken support for DMA that I was to use the expert install. I was told that since the installer in expert mode prompts me to pass parameters to a module it is about to load, I can pass the appropriate parameters to the module that

Re: How much autodetection does the expert install do? (was Re: beta 2 update)

2004-01-05 Thread Joey Hess
James J. Ramsey wrote: I was advised that to workaround my pet problem of my CD-ROM's broken support for DMA that I was to use the expert install. I was told that since the installer in expert mode prompts me to pass parameters to a module it is about to load, I can pass the appropriate

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:21:18PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: But asking the same novice installer to chose between /dev/scsi/host1/bus0/target0/lun0/disc and /dev/scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/disc for installing the boot sector is? No, but that's the best we have right now.

beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
debian-installer in the debian archive has been branched for beta 2. The udebs and installation images have been copied to testing. Changes necessary to get ports working for beta 2 can be propigated into testing; let me know about updated packages that need to go in. However, I will likely only

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread James J. Ramsey
--- Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unless we find something badly wrong with them, the installation images currently in testing for i386, and the Jan 3rd i386 isos will be the final images used for beta 2 for i386. I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still doesn't work with

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Joey Hess] Remember that the udebs in unstable should be considered frozen now, except for the changes needed for ports. I have several updates in my tree, waiting for alioth to get back online. The last few days you are the only one that have been able to upload changes into the archive, as

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread Kenshi Muto
At 5 Jan 04 00:11:35 GMT, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: Remember that the udebs in unstable should be considered frozen now, except for the changes needed for ports. I have several updates in my tree, waiting for alioth to get back online. The last few days you are the only one that have

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
James J. Ramsey wrote: I tested the Jan 3rd i386 netinst iso. It still doesn't work with older ATAPI CD-ROMs that can't handle DMA, since 1) the standard kernel parameter ide=nodma gets mysteriously ignored by the installer, There is nothing mysterious about it. Read the module HOWTO. and

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: I have several updates in my tree, waiting for alioth to get back online. The last few days you are the only one that have been able to upload changes into the archive, as CVS no longer have been available to coordinate the development, and at least I have been

Re: beta 2 update

2004-01-04 Thread Joey Hess
I wrote: We will need to change the CD build scripts around a bit now, so that daily CDs are built (especially for non-i386 arches) that contain the debs from testing, but the udebs from unstable (and appropriately developmental versions of the initrds as well). This is so that we can test