Steve McIntyre:
> I've taken the patch as-is for now.
Thank you.
> Robert / BSD folks - please keep
> us updated when kernels etc. change so that we can keep on top of
> those changes for CD builds.
Yes. Note that the next update (addition of kfreebsd-10) will be
backward-compatible, so FWIW it
On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 12:07:46PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Robert Millan (2013-09-28):
>> Here, attached patch should get jessie builds working again. Would you
>> be kind enough to commit it?
>
>Steve (from debian-cd@) is likely the one who's going to check it. I
>wonder, however, if the -
On 28/09/13 11:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [...] supported cdrom settings went from
> kfreebsd + kfreebsd-9 to kfreebsd-9 only; when adding kfreebsd-10
> support, the cdrom settings weren't added kfreebsd-10, and the patch
> below isn't adding it either (so the build should be OK since that part
>
Robert Millan (2013-09-28):
> Here, attached patch should get jessie builds working again. Would you
> be kind enough to commit it?
Steve (from debian-cd@) is likely the one who's going to check it. I
wonder, however, if the -boot/-cd changes are actually correct.
When removing kfreebsd 8 suppor
Cyril Brulebois:
> Robert Millan (2013-09-26):
>>> so you broke cdimage building for kfreebsd-*:
>>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8de108e7828cc3e2694309cbb045eb8db521c
>>>
>>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commi
Robert Millan (2013-09-26):
> > so you broke cdimage building for kfreebsd-*:
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8de108e7828cc3e2694309cbb045eb8db521c
> >
> >
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8de108e7
Hi Cyril,
Cyril Brulebois:
> Hi Robert,
>
> so you broke cdimage building for kfreebsd-*:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8de108e7828cc3e2694309cbb045eb8db521c
>
>
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8d
Hi Robert,
so you broke cdimage building for kfreebsd-*:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8de108e7828cc3e2694309cbb045eb8db521c
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=c5a8de108e7828cc3e2694309cbb045eb8db521c
Updated patch to include a commit message.
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Thiemo Nagel (thiemo.na...@gmail.com):
> > Package: partman-crypto
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: d-i patch
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > blockdev-wipe uses BLKGETSIZE64 to determine the size
Quoting Thiemo Nagel (thiemo.na...@gmail.com):
> Package: partman-crypto
> Severity: normal
> Tags: d-i patch
>
> Hello!
>
> blockdev-wipe uses BLKGETSIZE64 to determine the size of the device to be
> wiped. In case that fails, there currently is a fallback to BLKGETSIZE.
> Please remove the fal
Package: partman-crypto
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i patch
Hello!
blockdev-wipe uses BLKGETSIZE64 to determine the size of the device to be
wiped. In case that fails, there currently is a fallback to BLKGETSIZE.
Please remove the fallback (patch attached) for these reasons:
a) On 32bit platforms
[Replying to oldish email]
28.08.2013 20:30, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Joseph M. Deming, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 12:06:06 -0400, a écrit :
busybox fails to install due to dependency on libperl packages which then
depend on perlapi-5.14.2.
We're at the beginning of a perl transition. Packages need to
uld be improved, suspend to RAM broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have n
Your message dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:52:55 +0200
with message-id <201308311253.30231.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #693756,
regarding installation-reports: thinkpad edge e135: graphics broken, needs
n
Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:45:13 +0200
with message-id <201308301245.50219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #697692,
regarding installation-reports: Broken Partition if only one partition is used
to be
Joseph M. Deming, le Wed 28 Aug 2013 12:06:06 -0400, a écrit :
> busybox fails to install due to dependency on libperl packages which then
> depend on perlapi-5.14.2.
We're at the beginning of a perl transition. Packages need to be
rebuilt, simply. Perhaps we can ask for rebuilding busybox to fix
pretty sure it's broken due to dependencies. I started seeing the issue
yesterday, changed mirror to ftp.us.debian.org and saw same results.
still seeing it today.
busybox fails to install due to dependency on libperl packages which
then depend on perlapi-5.14.2.
but we have pe
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:18:09 +0200
with message-id <201308251018.25686.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #604101,
regarding installation-reports: Broken textmode installer display on EEE PC
701SD
Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 01:34:32 +0200
with message-id <201308250135.02500.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #654317,
regarding emdebian amd64 installer seemingly broken
to be marked as done.
This mean
On 21/08/13 13:40, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> FWIW the Linux i386 graphical installer under QEMU still fails to start
> Xorg; it doesn't look like it even tries to launch it, but complains it
> "cannot open display" or similar.
Maybe it's just me. It appears to be working now in Jenkins, at lea
Hi,
FWIW the Linux i386 graphical installer under QEMU still fails to start
Xorg; it doesn't look like it even tries to launch it, but complains it
"cannot open display" or similar. Although kfreebsd-amd64 is fine.
If I manually start Xorg it appears to start normally, except the
display remain
Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:12:11 +0200
with message-id <201307220112.30643.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #633725,
regarding debian-installer: On IBM x3650 M3 debian installer language selection
bro
Your message dated Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:48:53 +0200
with message-id <201307181149.40123.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports and d-i related bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #603035,
regarding kfreebsd-i386: broken display
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:43:43 +0200
with message-id <201307161143.46577.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line temp. problem due to perl transition, closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #648781,
regarding meltdown with broken perl
to be marked as done.
This means th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # merge duplicate bugreport + close
> forcemerge 696780 668617
Bug #696780 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [debian-installer]
kfreebsd-* netboot-9 boots wrong kernel filename
Bug #668617 [debian-installer] PXE Boot kfreebsd-9 broken
Severity
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 696780
Bug #696780 {Done: Cyril Brulebois } [debian-installer]
kfreebsd-* netboot-9 boots wrong kernel filename
Unarchived Bug 696780
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
696780: htt
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:34:54AM +0200, Wolf-Dieter Groll wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: important
>
> Upgrading to Wheezy failed with broken dependencies:
>
> apt-get -f dist-upgrade
> Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
> Abhängig
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Upgrading to Wheezy failed with broken dependencies:
apt-get -f dist-upgrade
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut
Statusinformationen werden eingelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeiten werden korrigiert... fehlgeschlagen
Le jeudi, 18 avril 2013 09.01:21, Godwin Monis a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have downloaded the latest debian squeeze 6.0.7 DVD iso's from
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.7/ia64/iso-dvd/. After downloading
> the ISO's I checked the md5 for debian-6.0.7-ia64-DVD-1.iso. This md5sum
> (7fb1cb78f8d
Hi,
I have downloaded the latest debian squeeze 6.0.7 DVD iso's from
http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.7/ia64/iso-dvd/. After downloading
the ISO's I checked the md5 for debian-6.0.7-ia64-DVD-1.iso. This md5sum
(7fb1cb78f8dd06111a52db95896b6792) matches the md5 given on the site at
http://cd
values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #701611 to the same values
previously set
Bug #701611 [src:linux] Darkscreen problem
Marked as found in versions linux/3.2.35-2.
> retitle 701611 Backlight control broken on Acer Aspire 7715
Bug #701611 [src:linux] Dark
Hi,
so is the latest patch by Abou acceptable? If the logic's ok I guess the
committer could also fix up the last bunch of coding style issues.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
This debian-installer bug is perhaps more serious than might seem from
the original bug report. It affects preseed/run and preseed/include. Not
clear how to adapt the work-around from the original bug report.
The bug also affects fetching in preseed/late_command, as well as
subsequent attempts
On 10/02/13 22:42, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:39:46PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 -enable-kvm -net nic -net
>> user,bootfile=grub2pxe,tftp=. -serial stdio -boot n -drive
>> if=ide,bus=0,file=/dev/sdX,cache=writeback -no-reboot
> Is it possi
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:39:46PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 -enable-kvm -net nic -net
> user,bootfile=grub2pxe,tftp=. -serial stdio -boot n -drive
> if=ide,bus=0,file=/dev/sdX,cache=writeback -no-reboot
>
> (Of course, replace /dev/sdX with appropriate loop/bl
On 08/02/13 19:16, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 08/02/13 11:19, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> So writing out interfaces is broken on kfreebsd since November and nobody
>> noticed.
>
> I ran into this problem at least twice when installing new systems but
> didn't realise
On 09/02/13 14:53, Holger Levsen wrote:
> nice. though I'd actually prefer to boot the mini.iso unmodified and
> still get pre-seeding, is that somehow possible?
Actually I see this as a really convenient feature of the GRUB-based
netinst images. It's very easy to add preseed and other options to
Hi Steve,
On Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I'd like to share a recipe that works for an extracted netboot.tar.gz:
>
> $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 -enable-kvm -net nic -net
> user,bootfile=grub2pxe,tftp=. -serial stdio -boot n -drive
> if=ide,bus=0,file=/dev/sdX,cache=write
Hi Holger,
On 08/02/13 13:21, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'd be happy to add kreebsd d-i tests to jenkins.debian.net if someone
> could help me come up with the right qemu command options, ie for
> --kernel, --initrd and --append.
That would be wonderful, I've been working toward something like this.
an rc1 aside
from #699704 and minor issue #693510.
> So writing out interfaces is broken on kfreebsd since November and nobody
> noticed.
I ran into this problem at least twice when installing new systems but
didn't realise yet it was a problem with the /e/n/i file or netcfg. My
work
08.02.2013 17:21, Holger Levsen пишет:
>
> On Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
>> So writing out interfaces is broken on kfreebsd since November and nobody
>
>> noticed.
>
> I'd be happy to add kreebsd d-i tests to jenkins.debian.net if someon
Hi,
On Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, Philipp Kern wrote:
> So writing out interfaces is broken on kfreebsd since November and nobody
> noticed.
I'd be happy to add kreebsd d-i tests to jenkins.debian.net if someone could
help me come up with the right qemu command options, ie for --kerne
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:19:49PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Did somebody test kfreebsd images in the recent past?
So writing out interfaces is broken on kfreebsd since November and nobody
noticed. On the other hand there hasn't been a d-i release since then.
*sigh*
Kind regards
Phil
However it seems to me that it is probably
broken as-is for kfreebsd because it will not write out that file.
Hence the installation will probably just write out a loopback
configuration in this case.
Did somebody test kfreebsd images in the recent past?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Daniel,
On Sonntag, 3. Februar 2013, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > I'm going to re-upload testing's version with an epoch to unbreak
> > everything.
> if you disagree with the maintainer, please follow the proper way
> (CTTE), thanks.
I believe the CTTE also wants to get wheezy released, and I don
On 02/04/2013 08:40 AM, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 10:53 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> On 02/03/2013 10:44 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> Now please explain how exactly syslinux-themes-debian is involved
>>> here.
>>
>> it's a bug in your config, you need more files present on the m
On 02/03/2013 10:53 PM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 02/03/2013 10:44 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> Now please explain how exactly syslinux-themes-debian is involved
>> here.
>
> it's a bug in your config, you need more files present on the media, as
> the link to the corresponding commit in live-bu
On 02/03/2013 10:58 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I'm going to re-upload testing's version with an epoch to unbreak
everything.
if you disagree with the maintainer, please follow the proper way
(CTTE), thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: dan
Daniel Baumann (03/02/2013):
> if you disagree with the maintainer, please follow the proper way
> (CTTE), thanks.
Per #2 of http://www.debian.org/devel/tech-ctte#referquestions, please
explain why you think you need syslinux 5 in sid.
Or you could just let the d-i team do its job and get a d-i
On 02/03/2013 10:44 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Now please explain how exactly syslinux-themes-debian is involved
here.
it's a bug in your config, you need more files present on the media, as
the link to the corresponding commit in live-build shows.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbu
Daniel Baumann (03/02/2013):
> On 02/03/2013 10:44 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >Now please explain how exactly syslinux-themes-debian is involved
> >here.
>
> it's a bug in your config, you need more files present on the media,
> as the link to the corresponding commit in live-build shows.
We'r
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 22:35:56 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> reassign 699382 syslinux-themes-debian
> thanks
>
> On 02/03/2013 09:00 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >I really don't see how this could be a bug in syslinux-themes-debian
>
> because it has absolutely nothing to do with syslinux, se
reassign 699382 syslinux-themes-debian
thanks
On 02/03/2013 09:00 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I really don't see how this could be a bug in syslinux-themes-debian
because it has absolutely nothing to do with syslinux, see
http://live.debian.net/gitweb/?p=live-build.git;a=commitdiff;h=1ef2dfea2
on't see how that
package relates to syslinux's being broken. I also don't see the link
with live-build.git.
cbrulebois@Cygnus:~/debian-installer/installer/build(0)$ grep ldlinux.c32
$(dpkg -L syslinux syslinux-common) 2>/dev/null
Binary file /usr/bin/syslinux matches
Binary file
from
2:4.06+dfsg-3 to 2:5.01+dfsg-1.
This is serious if not grave, breaking d-i builds. I'm currently
considering re-uploading syslinux version 4 to sid, since I see no
reasons for having version 5 there (especially so badly broken) when
we're trying to release wheezy. You have experiment
Hi Ben,
thanks for the quick reply !
here it is the partition table dump, attached
00 eb 63 90 10 8e d0 bc 00 b0 b8 00 00 8e d8 8e c0
10 fb be 00 7c bf 00 06 b9 00 02 f3 a4 ea 21 06 00
20 00 be be 07 38 04 75 0b 83 c6 10 81 fe fe 07 75
30 f3 eb 16 b4 02 b0 01 bb 00 7c b2 80 8a 74
an.org/debian/dists/squeeze/main/installer-amd64/
> --nographics -x"DEBIAN_FRONTEND=text console=ttyS0"
>
> I need a guest with just one (root) partition, no swap, because i want
> to easily grow the partition after later cloning. So i chose manual
> partitioning, created on
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #697692 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Broken Partition if
only one partition is used
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
697692: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697692
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
/, and went on.
Installation succeeded, guest did boot well in kvm, however, the
partition looks broken with sfdisk:
sfdisk -l /dev/mapper/vg_toad0-debian_squeeze_baseimage
Disk /dev/mapper/vg_toad0-debian_squeeze_baseimage: 157 cylinders, 255
heads, 63 sectors/track
Warning: The partition table looks l
On Sun, 2013-01-06 at 23:32 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:08:07PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > + if (r == XZ_STREAM_END) {
> > + /* Eat padding. Stream never starts with zeros, and
> > padding is 32 aligned */
> > + whi
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:08:07PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> + if (r == XZ_STREAM_END) {
> + /* Eat padding. Stream never starts with zeros, and
> padding is 32 aligned */
> + while ((iobuf.in_pos < iobuf.in_size) &&
> (iobuf.in[iobuf.in_
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 09:40:00PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
This was the wrong mail.
Bastian
--
Oblivion together does not frighten me, beloved.
-- Thalassa (in Anne Mulhall's body), "Return to Tomorrow",
stardate 4770.3.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:03:31AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> --- busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/fix-unxz-with-multiple-streams.patch
> 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
> +++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/fix-unxz-with-multiple-streams.patch
> 2012-12-21 19:23:12.0 +
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:08:07PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> I've fixed my patch and think that know it should really be conformant.
> I also attached some short samples to be tested. One of them only should
> fail to decode.
could somebody please review that patch and if suitable uplo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 651720 important
Bug #651720 {Done: Wouter Verhelst } [src:grub-installer]
new ZFS install on / fails if /boot isn't ZFS
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 08:38 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Abou Al Montacir wrote:
>
> > Hover, I assume we can save this extra code as soon as we don't loose
> > data.
>
> That's fine with me. All you'd need to do is error out if there is
> anything after the first stream. That would make it
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Hover, I assume we can save this extra code as soon as we don't loose
> data.
That's fine with me. All you'd need to do is error out if there is
anything after the first stream. That would make it a conformant
decoder and prevent silent data loss, though it would mean
On Mon, 2012-12-24 at 17:11 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 10:21 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> >> What happens if a stream ends at a buffer boundary, followed by
> >> padding? Or if padding doesn't fit in the buffer, for that
> >> matter?
> [
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 651720 new ZFS install on / fails if /boot isn't ZFS
Bug #651720 {Done: Wouter Verhelst } [src:grub-installer]
new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
Changed Bug title to 'new ZFS install on / fails if /boot is
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 10:21 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> What happens if a stream ends at a buffer boundary, followed by
>> padding? Or if padding doesn't fit in the buffer, for that
>> matter?
[...]
> Please find attached new debdiff with fix of above mentioned issu
On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 10:21 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>
> What happens if a stream ends at a buffer boundary, followed by
> padding? Or if padding doesn't fit in the buffer, for that
> matter?
>
> Hope that helps,
Please find attached new debdiff with fix of above mentioned issues.
Cheers,
On Sat, 2012-12-22 at 10:21 -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> What happens if a stream ends at a buffer boundary, followed by
> padding? Or if padding doesn't fit in the buffer, for that
> matter?
That make very low probability but could happe indeed. I will upload a
new patch which fixes this case
Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> +--- busybox-1.20.0~/archival/libarchive/decompress_unxz.c2012-12-20
> 21:51:04.0 +0100
> busybox-1.20.0/archival/libarchive/decompress_unxz.c 2012-12-20
> 21:49:11.0 +0100
> +@@ -87,7 +87,17 @@ unpack_xz_stream(transformer_aux_data_t *aux,
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 14:34 +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Add stream padding as specified in the spec.
> I'll provide a new patch for eating zeros and fixing issue pointed by Michael
Please find attached new patch handling padding and fixing issue
highlighted by Michael,
Cheers,
diff -Nru b
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 14:24 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:06:31PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > > Can you please test the attached pa
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 17:13 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 21.12.2012 17:06, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> >>> Can you please test the attached patch
> >>
> >> How does it
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:06:31PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > > Can you please test the attached patch
> > How does it implement stream padding?
> As it is impleme
21.12.2012 17:06, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
Can you please test the attached patch
How does it implement stream padding?
Hi Bastian,
As it is implemented, it will iterate
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 23:08 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> > Can you please test the attached patch
>
> How does it implement stream padding?
Hi Bastian,
As it is implemented, it will iterate until end of stream, but I did not
te
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> Can you please test the attached patch
How does it implement stream padding?
Bastian
--
What kind of love is that? Not to be loved; never to have shown love.
-- Commissioner Nancy Hedford, "Metamorphosis",
Hi,
Can you please test the attached patch
Cheers,
diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog
--- busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog 2012-09-20 08:32:55.0 +0200
+++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog 2012-12-20 22:04:02.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+busybox (1:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 12:22:12PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> This is a grave bug in busybox. Grave because it causes silent
> data loss - valid (according to the format specs) input is
> decompressed only partially.
The documentation say: "SHOULD support files that have more than one
Stream
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5804
Bug #686502 [pxz] pxz produces archives broken for busybox's unxz
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5804'.
> reassign -1 src:busybox 1:1.17.1-8
Your message dated Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:47:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651720: fixed in grub-installer 1.84
has caused the Debian Bug report #651720,
regarding new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Mon 03 Dec 2012 at 11:08:00 +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> As I was not concentrated during the disk partitioning process, the
> partition manager wanted to use my USB flash drive used for booting the
> installer for the system installation, and I only noticed when the
> partitioning table was
Hi,
Am Montag, 3. Dezember 2012, 17:43:03 schrieb Brian Potkin:
> On Mon 03 Dec 2012 at 11:08:00 +0100, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> > As I was not concentrated during the disk partitioning process, the
> > partition manager wanted to use my USB flash drive used for booting the
> > installer for the sy
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
As I was not concentrated during the disk partitioning process, the
partition manager wanted to use my USB flash drive used for booting the
installer for the system installation, and I only noticed when the
partitioning tab
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:grub-installer
Bug #651720 [partman-zfs] new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
Bug reassigned from package 'partman-zfs' to 'src:grub-installer'.
No longer marked as found in versions partman-zfs/23.
Ignoring
Control: reassign -1 src:grub-installer
Control: found -1 1.83
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: tags -1 + patch
Hi,
This issue relates to GNU/kFreeBSD installs with a ZFS root filesystem,
but with a non-ZFS /boot partition. The previously attempted fix in
partman-zfs would have worked for all
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi Arno!
Sorry, I somehow didn't have 651...@bugs.debian.org copied on my
previous mail so I'm inlining your mail for the benefit of the BTS:
On 20/11/12 23:19, Arno Töll wrote:
I am not sure if checking for / being ZFS is good enough then. Would
Hi Arno!
Sorry, I somehow didn't have 651...@bugs.debian.org copied on my
previous mail so I'm inlining your mail for the benefit of the BTS:
On 20/11/12 23:19, Arno Töll wrote:
> I am not sure if checking for / being ZFS is good enough then. Wouldn't
> we need to check for any file system being
[Err, sorry sent the message everywhere but to the bug]
Hi Steven,
On 11/16/2012 10:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I noticed some relevant code in the grub-installer script that seems to
> do that:
>
>> if [ "$bootfstype" = "zfs" ]; then
>> # Required by update-grub on ZFS
>> mkdir
Hi Steven,
On 11/16/2012 10:42 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I noticed some relevant code in the grub-installer script that seems to
> do that:
>
>> if [ "$bootfstype" = "zfs" ]; then
>> # Required by update-grub on ZFS
>> mkdir -p $ROOT/boot/zfs
>> cp /boot/zfs/zpool.cache $ROOT
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: USB
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-CD-1.iso
(2012-11-13)
Date: 2012-11-18
Machine: Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E135 (bios disabled, using only uefi)
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 651720 23
Bug #651720 [partman-zfs] new ZFS installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
Marked as found in versions partman-zfs/23.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
651720
found 651720 src:partman-zfs/23
thanks
[adding debian-bsd@ back into Cc:]
Hi!
> Generating grub.cfg ...
> Found kernel of FreeBSD: /boot/kfreebsd-9.0-2-amd64.gz
> Found kernel module directory: /lib/modules/9.0-2-amd64
> ls: cannot access /boot/zfs/zpool.cache: No such file or directory
Maybe t
Hi Everybody,
I tried to install Wheezy, the nightly and weekly builds on a system
with UEFI bios yesterday and unfortunately it failed. Based on messages
I got it seems that the kernel in the UEFI image doesn't match the
additional kernel modules. When I used the latest Beta, it worked.
The
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 651720
> reopen 651720
Bug #651720 {Done: Robert Millan } [partman-zfs] new ZFS
installs completely broken in Wheezy/Sid
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will
unarchive 651720
reopen 651720
tags 651720 d-i
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd zfs
thanks
Running the most recent Wheezy d-i installer on kfreebsd fails, when
/boot is configured as a separate UFS partition, and / is on ZFS. The
installation fails with:
Nov 9 00:07:55 grub-i
Your message dated Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:18:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606636: fixed in netcfg 1.99
has caused the Debian Bug report #606636,
regarding hostname/domain name preseeding is quite broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
401 - 500 of 1640 matches
Mail list logo
