Re: slimmer busybox (was Re: build failure on ia32)

2001-09-24 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Sep 23, 2001 at 05:17:46PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'll have one tomorrow. Since I lost my job on Friday, I've > > now got a bit more time on my hands for doing useful things, > > This never happened did it? It did last night. :)

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-09 Thread Erik Andersen
On Sun Sep 09, 2001 at 07:20:56PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > as soon as a busybox enters woody that doesn't include loads of > cruft things will be fine. I'll have one tomorrow. Since I lost my job on Friday, I've now got a bit more time on my hands for doing useful things, -Erik -- E

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-09 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 11:05:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Oh, OK, I'm completely wrong again :) So much for that. I wonder why > we're so much tighter on space, then. we still have a bit more cruft then other arches, but not that much really. we are again fine with a debloated b

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 03:45:48PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 03:13:14PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Hmm. Then something must be eating up all that space -- powerpc > > > binaries are not that much bigger then x86 binaries... Is library > > > reduction not wo

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-09 Thread Ethan Benson
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 03:13:14PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Hmm. Then something must be eating up all that space -- powerpc > > binaries are not that much bigger then x86 binaries... Is library > > reduction not working on powerpc? > > No, PowerPC needs extra tools. We have hfsutil

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-09 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
[wow, can you tell I'm cleaning up a mail backlog?] On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Tue Sep 04, 2001 at 04:18:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > yup but again i still need busybox reduction since none of this reiser > > stuff is on the powerpc disks, and

Re: busybox reduction on ppc (was Re: build failure on ia32)

2001-09-05 Thread Eduard Bloch
#include Adam Di Carlo wrote on Wed Sep 05, 2001 um 04:30:30AM: > Have you tried mklibs.py ? Does it work? Does it do a better job? > > If so, we should enable it, possibly for all arches. Works flawless on i386. BTW: If nobody objects, I will enable the parted stuff in the udma100-ext3 var

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-05 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 06:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Tue Sep 04, 2001 at 04:18:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > > > yup but again i still need busybox reduction since none of this reiser > > stuff is on the powerpc disks, and i still have a problem with space > > there. > > Hm

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-05 Thread Glenn McGrath
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:48:13 -0600 "Erik Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, since we have to mount the target fs, we already have to pay most of the > price for ext2 anyways (the size of mkfs.ext2 and the size of the kernel ext2 > code). So switching to minixfs isn't going to save us

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-04 Thread John H. Robinson, IV
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:47:48PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > > [andersen@slag gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds5]$ dpkg -l reiserfsprogs | tail -n1 > ii reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j-6 User-level tools for ReiserFS filesystems > [andersen@slag gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds5]$ du -hc /sbin/mkreiserfs /sbin/reiserfsck >

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-04 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Sep 04, 2001 at 04:18:42PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > yup but again i still need busybox reduction since none of this reiser > stuff is on the powerpc disks, and i still have a problem with space > there. Hmm. Then something must be eating up all that space -- powerpc binaries are

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 05:47:48PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Tue Sep 04, 2001 at 02:51:05PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > > same thing on powerpc, though i can't explain powerpc i can explain > > i386. > > > > from SMALL_BASE_LIST_i386: > > > > sbin/mkreiserfs > > sbin/reiserfsck > > sbi

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-04 Thread Erik Andersen
On Tue Sep 04, 2001 at 02:51:05PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote: > same thing on powerpc, though i can't explain powerpc i can explain > i386. > > from SMALL_BASE_LIST_i386: > > sbin/mkreiserfs > sbin/reiserfsck > sbin/resize_reiserfs > > reiserfsck is something like 180k, resize_reiserfs is 80,

Re: build failure on ia32

2001-09-04 Thread Ethan Benson
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 04:31:34PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Is this an error we will ignore today? > > > > Oh, we should fix it. Bump up the size. I wonder what is causing the > > bloat..

build failure on ia32

2001-09-04 Thread Martin Schulze
Is this an error we will ignore today? I: making detached root disk root1200.bin from root.bin 1200+0 records in 1200+0 records out 1200+0 records in 1200+0 records out E: root.bin is larger than root1200.bin (1366439 > 1228800) E: ./rescue.sh abort make[1]: *** [resc1200.bin] Error 255 make[1]: