Re: busybox FTBFS bugs

2003-08-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 08:18:47AM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > I've just submitted another FTBFS bug against busybox-cvs for the Alpha; > this is blocking d-i building on alpha, and I'd guess ia64. ia64 is broken because broken kernel headers in the glibc. > Now, looking at the sources, I

Re: busybox FTBFS bugs

2003-08-02 Thread Glenn McGrath
On 02 Aug 2003 08:18:47 +0100 Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just submitted another FTBFS bug against busybox-cvs for the > Alpha; this is blocking d-i building on alpha, and I'd guess ia64. > > Now, looking at the sources, I can submit a patch easily enough; > but

busybox FTBFS bugs

2003-08-02 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi, I've just submitted another FTBFS bug against busybox-cvs for the Alpha; this is blocking d-i building on alpha, and I'd guess ia64. Now, looking at the sources, I can submit a patch easily enough; but whats the plan with busybox-cvs : are we going to patch it, or move to a newer version from