> True. But -v is specified by SuS and is in the Austin Draft. Incidentally,
> the command type is also specified by the two documents.
`type' is X/Open, no?
Perhaps Debian policy should be revised to require support
for SuS instead of POSIX.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> command is mandated.
> command -v is optional.
> Therefore the above snippet might echo
> 'your system is broken' on a POSIX-compliant
> system.
True. But -v is specified by SuS and is in the Austin Draft. Incidentally,
the command type is also specifi
> `command'
>
> if (command -v chmod > /dev/null 2>&1) ; then
> chmod go-w /foobar
> else
> echo 'your system is broken' 2>&1
> exit 1
> fi
>
> its a shell builtin mandated by posix.
>
> version of busybox is 0.61-1
command is mandated.
command -v is optional.
Therefore the
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:16:17AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Mon Sep 03, 2001 at 04:48:03AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > >
> > > I consider it a full replacement, and with have now had several releases
> > > with the busy
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 11:13:28AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> I just did a quick check -- disabling both dirname and basename will
> save exactly 256 bytes on x86. Worth it?
yes, we need every byte we can get. powerpc binaries are always
larger then i386 anyway, and we are really hurting.
On Mon Sep 03, 2001 at 01:47:47AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > > removing ar along i imagine would not gain very much, but then again
> > > we need every byte we can get.
> >
> > For the current set of busybox applets, I've made a
On Mon Sep 03, 2001 at 04:48:03AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> >
> > I consider it a full replacement, and with have now had several releases
> > with the busybox ash shell. There are no known bugs...
>
> heres one, command is not
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
>
> I consider it a full replacement, and with have now had several releases
> with the busybox ash shell. There are no known bugs...
heres one, command is not implemented (its posix last i checked).
this breaks yabootconfig, ybin,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 11:48:13PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> > removing ar along i imagine would not gain very much, but then again
> > we need every byte we can get.
>
> For the current set of busybox applets, I've made a best guess as
> to what is likely to be needed. If somone can find s
On Sun Sep 02, 2001 at 04:53:08AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:37:20AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> >
> > If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox by
> > about 6.5kB (by my calculations), one of the reasons being that most of
> > the busy
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 07:30:07AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > we can also save about 10 or 12k using the ash udeb as its compiled
> > -Os instead of -O2.
>
> Actually, most of the saving only applies to i386 as it comes from
my figures are from a
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
> > too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
>
> Did you use mklibs.sh or mklibs.py? If the former try the later.
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we can also save about 10 or 12k using the ash udeb as its compiled
> -Os instead of -O2.
Actually, most of the saving only applies to i386 as it comes from
ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),i386)
OPTSM += \
-malign-loops=0 -malign-jumps=0 -malign-funct
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
> too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
Did you use mklibs.sh or mklibs.py? If the former try the later.
And please, if mklibs.py doesn't work send me a logfile with verry
verbose ou
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:45:41AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 06:37:20 +1000
> "Glenn McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox
> by
> > about 6.5kB (by my calculations),
>
> My caclulations were wron
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 06:37:20AM +1000, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>
> If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox by
> about 6.5kB (by my calculations), one of the reasons being that most of
> the busybox unarchiving applets have been reorganised, however tar hasnt
> been
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 06:37:20 +1000
"Glenn McGrath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If we use busybox dpkg-deb instead of ar and tar it will reduce busybox
by
> about 6.5kB (by my calculations),
My caclulations were wrong, it will only save 3.5kB, still i think its
better to use dpkg-deb as it shou
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:04:22 -0800
"Ethan Benson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
> too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
>
> looking at busybox there is plenty of bloat that can be removed, i was
> able to bring /bin/busybox (
The root disk is currently too bloated, on pmac and chrp its already
too large to fit on a 1.44MB floppy.
looking at busybox there is plenty of bloat that can be removed, i was
able to bring /bin/busybox (current 0.61-1) down from 200792 bytes to
153088, a nearly 47k decrease.
i have attach
19 matches
Mail list logo
