Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
(only a few comments here and there)
- partman components are very tightly coupled
Very frequently changes, such as adding ext4 support, requires making
related changes to multiple components. Being able to do so in a single
branch in a single
On Friday 25 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
- partman components are very tightly coupled
Very frequently changes, such as adding ext4 support, requires
making related changes to multiple components. Being able to do so in
a single branch
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
[2] Note that this IMO implies cdebconf also gets dropped from the master
PO files and thus gets translation handling like any regular Debian
package.
That can be done. At least from my l10n POV.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Let me start with a request to other team members: PLEASE join this
discussion. Think about how *you* use the repository; consider whether you
are confortable with git or not; think about the issues raised both by
Joey and me; and *give your opinion*.
I hate the fact that this looks to be
Frans Pop wrote:
crazy
butt ugly
insane
reeks
can't be bothered to do a proper migration
Well, I think we know how you feel about this. But, the presence of the
above words makes it much more difficult to write a friendly, reasoned,
objective, non-defensive reply.
Given the team meeting
Given the team meeting this evening I guess this is my last chance to
comment. The main reason I haven't so far is that I find myself simply
caring less and less, but well.
I really have only one argument against the switch to git: the splitting of
the repository into multiple separate
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 23:51 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
[1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD
images using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the docs
and tools directories :-)
One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
to ;-)) was
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
to ;-))
Hmmm? Never heard of the BTS? ;-)
was that I wanted a partial mirror of main+contrib of testing
but just main/debian-installer of sid. I wanted this so that I can
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 10:06 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Ian Campbell wrote:
One issue I had with debmirror in the past (with nobody to complain
to ;-))
Hmmm? Never heard of the BTS? ;-)
Fair point ;-) I just never quite got round to it when there seemed to
be no
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate using
On Monday 07 September 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Have you made some progress here? During the team meeting today, there
is a rough consensus that we should move on but all of us agreed that
you could have interesting comments and, even if they aren't as
polished as you would like to, it
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Frans Popelen...@planet.nl wrote:
...
... debmirror[1] ...
...
[1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD images
using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the docs and
tools directories :-)
Would you please describe
On Tuesday 08 September 2009, Lee Winter wrote:
[1] Which now supports mirroring everything needed to to create CD
images using debian-cd, including (released) D-I images and the
docs and tools directories :-)
Would you please describe what is left that the new version of
debmirror will
On Thursday 13 August 2009, Joey Hess wrote:
We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate using
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:49:50PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
packages/po[4] in svn.
Joey Hess wrote:
Remove $Id$ keywords from all files that have them; git doesn't
support that. (Do after conversion)
git supports $Id$; you just have to explicitly request it, as you do
with svn (using svn:keywords). Quoting the gitattributes(5) manpage:
ident
When the
We discussed switching to git at DebConf, and came up with a compromise
plan that seemed reasonable to all in attendance[1]: Split each d-i
package into its own git repository[2], but leave the manual[3] and
packages/po[4] in svn. Investigate using submodules[6] and/or mr
to tie the git
17 matches
Mail list logo
