On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:56:58AM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 10/09/14 07:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
I think the DebianDesktop requalification table lacks an important
row: the availability of the desktop environment in question on all
Debian architectures.
Not everyone has been
On 11/09/14 16:36, Adam Borowski wrote:
What happens otherwise if trying to start GNOME3 (or others)?
* without 3D, with llvmpipe
* without both
llvmpipe doesn't work at all -- not ported to -- on !x86 !armhf.
Does it fall back gracefully to a fallback/flashback mode, and does that
still
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:11:22PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 11/09/14 16:36, Adam Borowski wrote:
What happens otherwise if trying to start GNOME3 (or others)?
* without 3D, with llvmpipe
* without both
llvmpipe doesn't work at all -- not ported to -- on !x86 !armhf.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:36:18PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
I just re-checked on powerpc in qemu, unlike my other setups it's not a real
machine, but qemu is at least a reproducible setup without out-of-archive
bits like all three of my armhf rigs.
I'd say you'd need 'availability' or
So it looks like gnome3 is the only one that doesn't work on most
architectures.
You tested qemu, not real hardware.
For your tests to be really meaningful, they would have to be done on
actual hardware.
That said, I don't see a good reason why availability on architectures
should be a
On 11/09/14 19:26, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:11:22PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Fair enough if a Debian desktop doesn't want to support toy
architectures (I don't mind use of this term).
So you call all but two[1] of Debian architectures (14+9) toys[2]? Where
I think there could be two distinct sets of criteria:
1. criteria for the premier desktop to suit most users - it's
counter-productive for portability to be a major factor in this
2. criteria for the next-best desktop where 1. isn't practical -
portability, versatility and media size are much
Hi!
I think the DebianDesktop requalification table lacks an important
row: the availability of the desktop environment in question on all
Debian architectures.
This is mainly an argument against gnome3, as it's restricted basically
to just amd64, i386 and armhf (poorly):
* systemd is not
On 10/09/14 07:40, Adam Borowski wrote:
I think the DebianDesktop requalification table lacks an important
row: the availability of the desktop environment in question on all
Debian architectures.
Not everyone has been persuaded on that principle yet :P But on
kfreebsd CDs we can at least
Steven Chamberlain, le Wed 10 Sep 2014 11:56:58 +0100, a écrit :
What happens otherwise if trying to start GNOME3 (or others)?
* without 3D, with llvmpipe
* without both
Does it fall back gracefully to a fallback/flashback mode, and does that
still work these days? In this mode would it
Adam Borowski wrote:
I think the DebianDesktop requalification table lacks an important
row: the availability of the desktop environment in question on all
Debian architectures.
While that can be a minor consideration (it would be nicest to be
consistent if possible), we've had different
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
Adam Borowski wrote:
I think the DebianDesktop requalification table lacks an important
row: the availability of the desktop environment in question on all
Debian architectures.
While that can be a minor consideration (it would be nicest to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
