I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of
ifupdown and what the implications are for debian upgrades generally.
isc-dhcp-client as of the last upgrade is telling users to stop using it
(the default
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client
(that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality
of ifupdown and what the implications are for debian upgrades
generally.
isc-dhcp
Hi Michael,
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> So what's the path forward, maintaining compatibility and not breaking
> systems upgrading from current stable? Do we come up with a dhcpcd5 variant
> that *only* touches interfaces it is directed to touch via
> /etc/netw
El 08/05/22 a las 11:24, Michael Stone escribió:
> [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
>
> I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
> and what the imp
08.05.2022 18:24, Michael Stone wrote:
[apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete fail]
> I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
> and
On 2022-05-08 2:07 p.m., Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
alternatives are needed) in combination with the functionality of ifupdown
and what the implications are for d
On Mon, 9 May 2022 at 08:07, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 11:24:12AM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> > [apologies to package aliases getting this twice due to autocomplete
> fail]
>
> > I've been trying to make sense of the NEWS item in isc-dhcp-client (that
> > alternatives are
On Sunday, 8 May 2022 21:34:39 CEST Michael Tokarev wrote:
> What's up with ISC dhclient?
"ISC DHCP Client and Relay End of Maintenance" @
https://www.isc.org/blogs/dhcp-client-relay-eom/
Couple of quotes:
"ISC plans to end maintenance of the ISC DHCP client and relay by the end of
Q1, 2022."
Michael Hudson-Doyle writes:
> Well busybox's udhcpc would seem a likely candidate here -- but its IPv6
> support (iirc the reason we switch to dhclient from klibc's ipconfig in
> Ubuntu's initramfs, at least) is described as incomplete.
udhcpc is a very good IPv4 candidate indeed. The ability
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 11:38 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Michael Hudson-Doyle writes:
>
> > Well busybox's udhcpc would seem a likely candidate here -- but its IPv6
> > support (iirc the reason we switch to dhclient from klibc's ipconfig in
> > Ubuntu's initramfs, at least) is described as incomple
11 matches
Mail list logo
