Re: linux/custom/expert vs workstation/server/expert

2004-03-13 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il ven, 2004-03-12 alle 17:03, Bernhard R. Link ha scritto: * Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040312 13:47]: [...] What about just 'fast' 'custom' 'expert' for high medium and low. (perhaps having 'veryfast' for critical, too) [...] what about: automatic, semiautomatic, detailed ? or

linux/custom/expert vs workstation/server/expert

2004-03-12 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:51:10PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 10:17, Erich Waelde wrote: would it seem reasonable to add another boot method (don't know a better term) to d-i like so NameSetting Description linux DEBCONF_PRIORITY=high

Re: linux/custom/expert vs workstation/server/expert

2004-03-12 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040312 13:47]: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:51:10PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Friday 12 March 2004 10:17, Erich Waelde wrote: NameSetting Description linux DEBCONF_PRIORITY=highminimum questions asked (recommended) custom

Re: linux/custom/expert vs workstation/server/expert

2004-03-12 Thread Don Wright
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 17:03:51 +0100, Bernhard R. Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about just 'fast' 'custom' 'expert' for high medium and low. (perhaps having 'veryfast' for critical, too) (expert is still a bad word, as it also bear the confusion for a newbie Perhaps 'verbose' would be

Re: linux/custom/expert vs workstation/server/expert

2004-03-12 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 12 March 2004 21:09, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Geert Stappers ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Besides other arguments developed all around this topic, workstation has one main drawback. It includes w and a letters which are always difficult