On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:09:51PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > How about I create a new type called nativehd or something?
>
> With i386's hd-media, only the cdrom iso is loopback mounted, the
> initrd, kernel, and bootloader can all be on the HD the same way.
Agreed,
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:51:38PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > You don't. In both cases, you need to download an image, boot the native
> > > OS, start a kernel loader which will put the image up as a RAMdisk, and
> > > go from there. The diff
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 01:51:38PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > You don't. In both cases, you need to download an image, boot the native
> > OS, start a kernel loader which will put the image up as a RAMdisk, and
> > go from there. The difference is that the CD-ROM image wil
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You don't. In both cases, you need to download an image, boot the native
> OS, start a kernel loader which will put the image up as a RAMdisk, and
> go from there. The difference is that the CD-ROM image will get its
> udebs from CDROM, whereas the network image will work w
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:16:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > So you'd rather call these floppy?
> >
> > I'll note that i386 can boot off floppy, whereas amiga and mac
> > cannot. Would another target name be clearer?
> >
> > I don't care much one way or the other. S
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:16:41PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > So you'd rather call these floppy?
> >
> > I'll note that i386 can boot off floppy, whereas amiga and mac
> > cannot. Would another target name be clearer?
> >
> > I don't care much one way or the other. S
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> So you'd rather call these floppy?
>
> I'll note that i386 can boot off floppy, whereas amiga and mac
> cannot. Would another target name be clearer?
>
> I don't care much one way or the other. So far everything will fit on
> a floppy, but I hadn't much been paying a
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:24:35PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > Atari and mvme147 should have netboot targets.
> >
> > I'm using the term netboot inconsistently on m68k. Ya'll tell me if it
> > should be changed. Amiga, atari, and mac cannot be tftp booted. So the
> > net
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> Atari and mvme147 should have netboot targets.
>
> I'm using the term netboot inconsistently on m68k. Ya'll tell me if it
> should be changed. Amiga, atari, and mac cannot be tftp booted. So the
> netboot target really just loads components and base off the net instead
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:14:46PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> I've updated the d-i ports status page for d-i. Check it out in 4 hours
> or so and make sure it's now accurate.
I don't think there's a real point for a floppy version for amiga or
mac. You can't boot from
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> I know ya'll have been just been waiting to hear about the m68k port!
> ;-)
Thanks for the report.
> kernels: if someone else hasn't gotten there first, I plan on looking
> at integrating 2.2 with linux-kernel-di and make sure the
> packaging is uniform betw
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:35:42PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> kernels: if someone else hasn't gotten there first, I plan on looking
> at integrating 2.2 with linux-kernel-di and make sure the
> packaging is uniform between 2.2 and 2.4 m68k kernels. (I'd hate
> to mess with
I know ya'll have been just been waiting to hear about the m68k port!
;-)
I still haven't completed a full install from scratch, with no
work-arounds. However, I think all of the obstacles have been overcome.
kernels: if someone else hasn't gotten there first, I plan on looking
at integra
13 matches
Mail list logo
