On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:56:30PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Another question : where I post this kind of report ?
If debian-boot is not the good place, ok, sorry for the disturb, but where ?
I assume that the pointer to
reassign 388159 installation-reports
retitle 388159 installation-reports: Please depend on lspci
severity wishlist
thanks
Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: base
Please do not file bugs against the base pseudo-package.
It is there just as a catch-all-I-dunno-where-to-file-this-report for
users that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 388159 installation-reports
Bug#388159: missing lspci on a fresh install
Bug reassigned from package `base' to `installation-reports'.
retitle 388159 installation-reports: Please depend on lspci
Bug#388159: missing lspci on a fresh install
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:25:21AM +0200, Amaya wrote:
reassign 388159 installation-reports
retitle 388159 installation-reports: Please depend on lspci
severity wishlist
thanks
Hi Amaya, ...
Rick Thomas wrote:
Package: base
Please do not file bugs against the base pseudo-package.
It
severity 388159 wishlist
stop
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
severity wishlist
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
--
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 388159 wishlist
Bug#388159: installation-reports: Please depend on lspci
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
I feel my previous email could be taken as harsh on my side, which it
was not menat to be at all. I apologize to the reporter if he feels this
way.
Sven Luther wrote:
it was Frans who suggested this, and doing ping-pong of bug reporters
is hardly user friendly
I am not doing ping pong of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 388159 wishlist
Bug#388159: installation-reports: Please depend on lspci
Severity set to `wishlist' from `wishlist'
stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 12:19:57PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
I feel my previous email could be taken as harsh on my side, which it
was not menat to be at all. I apologize to the reporter if he feels this
way.
:)
Sven Luther wrote:
it was Frans who suggested this, and doing ping-pong of bug
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 02:44:40PM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:13, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:56, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of
testing. I have a strange bug with the network
Hello all
I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of testing.
I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
lo become eth0
eth0 become eth1_temp
and I cannot access the network.
I try to start lspci to identify my network card but this tools missing.
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:56, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of
testing. I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
lo become eth0
eth0 become eth1_temp
and I cannot access the network.
Known issue. Upgrade to udev
Frans Pop a écrit :
Known issue. Upgrade to udev from unstable.
How can I do that without network access ?
Then install pci-utils...
Ok, but why this tool are not on the base-system ?
Cheers,
FJP
Thanks for your respons
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:13, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 14:56, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
I just finish a new net-install with the daily builds 20060918 of
testing. I have a strange bug with the network after the first reboot.
lo become eth0
eth0 become eth1_temp
and I
On Monday 18 September 2006 15:39, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Known issue. Upgrade to udev from unstable.
How can I do that without network access ?
Use another machine to download the package and a USB stick to move it to
your machine the install using 'dpkg -i'?
Then
Thanks,
I follow the procedure from this link :
http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-boot@lists.debian.org/msg77135.html
and work now.
Guy
Frans Pop a écrit :
On Monday 18 September 2006 15:39, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
Known issue. Upgrade to udev from unstable.
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and
what is not.
Then who is? Where should I send a bug report?
On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and what is not.
Then who is? Where should I send a bug report?
What is your rationale for
Hello Rick, Frans
Rick Thomas a écrit :
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base system and
what is not.
Then who is? Where should I send a bug report?
Yes, I'am surprising also about this kind of
Hello Frans
Correct place to file a bug report would be the pseudo package base, but
I strongly suggest you do not file a bug for this.
I not consider that is a bug, but an essential functionality that are
missing just after a bad reboot.
Regards
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Monday 18 September 2006 23:26, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
I not consider that is a bug, but an essential functionality that are
missing just after a bad reboot.
No it is not as the installer has already saved the info
in /var/log/installer/.
And even after a bad reboot it is hardly essential
Package: base
On Sep 18, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and what is not.
Then who is? Where
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:24:17PM +0200, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Rick Thomas a écrit :
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base system and
what is not.
Then who is? Where should I send a bug
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 10:57:24PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 18 September 2006 21:49, Rick Thomas wrote:
On Sep 18, 2006, at 10:17 AM, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Frans Pop a écrit :
The d-i team is not responsible for what is part of the base
system and what is not.
Then who is?
24 matches
Mail list logo
