Re: using addon pack for base (Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15)

2000-08-23 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [ADDON discussion clipped] > > Using this scheme, we can use the same base tar ball for all > > languages, with some extra language pack which consist of > > required packages for a language. > > > > I think this will not affect the main C/english only

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-18 Thread Akira YOSHIYAMA
Hi, On 18 Aug 2000 15:19:29 -0400 Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, of course. I've ported and tested b-f to NEC PC-9800 architecture > > for a long time ,and used termwrap from last month. It works fine. > > Ok -- I committed it.

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-18 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, of course. I've ported and tested b-f to NEC PC-9800 architecture > for a long time ,and used termwrap from last month. It works fine. Ok -- I committed it. Its in the mainline. -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> --

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-14 Thread Akira YOSHIYAMA
Hi, On 14 Aug 2000 12:53:45 -0400 Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > OK. Here is a patch for the latest CVS. > > Oh wow. Is this ready for seirous testing and inclusion in 2.2.17? > Have you tested it? Yes, of course. I've ported and

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-14 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. Here is a patch for the latest CVS. Oh wow. Is this ready for seirous testing and inclusion in 2.2.17? Have you tested it? -- .Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-12 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Basically, the change in basedisks.sh for termwrap is only copying > termwrap from scripts/basedisks to the base archive. Another work > to support termwrap is changing in > scripts/rootdisk/prototype/etc/inittab.install. I'm sure it's quite easy, bu

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-09 Thread Akira YOSHIYAMA
Hi, On Wed, 09 Aug 2000 20:26:03 +0900 Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "08 Aug 2000 10:19:29 -0400", > with "Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15", > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-09 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "08 Aug 2000 10:19:29 -0400", with "Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15", Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Surely, we can do with basedisks.sh hack

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-08 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Surely, we can do with basedisks.sh hacking. But, it makes the script > more complex and dirty. Are we talking about woody or potato? If woody, then sure, lets find a cleaner way to do it. If woody, however, it doesn't matter all that much since th

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-07 Thread Akira YOSHIYAMA
Hi, On Tue, 08 Aug 2000 01:29:02 +0900 Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > on "07 Aug 2000 11:27:48 -0400", > with "Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15", > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-07 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "07 Aug 2000 11:27:48 -0400", with "Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15", Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think scripts/rootdisk/sbin/termwrap is the way

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-07 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had read that "just have it be added as part of base2_2.tgz" means > creating a new package and get it into base2_2.tgz. > > I think scripts/rootdisk/sbin/termwrap is the way to add it into > just root disk only, without adding the code to put it in

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-06 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Thanks for your reply, Adam. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on "06 Aug 2000 10:22:47 -0400", Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > If this can be used, then I propose to put this into CVS > > > > as scripts/rootdisk/prototype/sbin/termwrap, and to add lines at > > > > the end of extract_

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-08-06 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry for delay. Ditto. > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 15 Jul 2000 16:35:24 -0400, > Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Maybe Chinese and Korean people can use the scheme by adding > > > their setup in "case $LANG in". > > > > > > If

using addon pack for base (Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15)

2000-07-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. (This is the topic for debian-boot. please reply to that list). In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 07 Jul 2000 12:36:19 +0900, I wrote: > To show the Japanese messages on the console, we need some > terminal emulator such as kon and jfbterm. I think Chinese > requires something another one (mayb

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Sorry for delay. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 15 Jul 2000 16:35:24 -0400, Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe Chinese and Korean people can use the scheme by adding > > their setup in "case $LANG in". > > > > If this can be used, then I propose to put this into CVS > > as script

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-17 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > Is there any way to i18n the forked (potato) debconf? > > Yes of course. And I know from experience it means touching every file > in the package, and writing at least 200 lines of code. Oh well. If we can have i18n versions of t

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-15 Thread Joey Hess
Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Is there any way to i18n the forked (potato) debconf? Yes of course. And I know from experience it means touching every file in the package, and writing at least 200 lines of code. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akira YOSHIYAMA wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:20:59 -0700 > > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Unfortunatly, the debconf in frozen has known very serious problems if > > > it is used with i18n enabled. It basically doesn't work at all. Of

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-15 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Akira sent me his initial draft for the wrapper script. Here it is: [...] > Maybe Chinese and Korean people can use the scheme by adding > their setup in "case $LANG in". > > If this can be used, then I propose to put this into CVS > as scripts/rootd

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-11 Thread Joey Hess
Akira YOSHIYAMA wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:20:59 -0700 > Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Unfortunatly, the debconf in frozen has known very serious problems if > > it is used with i18n enabled. It basically doesn't work at all. Of > > course the one in unstable has these ussied fi

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-11 Thread Akira YOSHIYAMA
Hi, On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:20:59 -0700 Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unfortunatly, the debconf in frozen has known very serious problems if > it is used with i18n enabled. It basically doesn't work at all. Of > course the one in unstable has these ussied fixed, but I din't > reccommend

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-10 Thread Joey Hess
Unfortunatly, the debconf in frozen has known very serious problems if it is used with i18n enabled. It basically doesn't work at all. Of course the one in unstable has these ussied fixed, but I din't reccommend using frozen's debconf in another language. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-06 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. Thank you for working on our b-f, Akira. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:59:14 +0900, on not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15, Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm working to port b-f (cvs) to Linux/98 (Linux for > NEC PC-98x1 serie

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-06 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. Thank you Adam and Erik :) On Wed, 5 Jul 2000 19:35:14 -0600, Erik Andersen wrote: > On Wed Jul 05, 2000 at 06:51:40PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > > If our bf-utf8 will be completed, we may need to change this > > > in order to invoke the bterm and run the dpkg-reconfigure on that.

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-05 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Jul 05, 2000 at 06:51:40PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > If our bf-utf8 will be completed, we may need to change this > > in order to invoke the bterm and run the dpkg-reconfigure on that. > > Now with this issue added on top, I almost wonder if we shouldn't have > init invoke a wrapp

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-05 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > at "Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:59:14 +0900", > with "not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15", > Akira YOSHIYAMA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I found that installed fresh

Re: not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-05 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. (Akira is the main hacker for ja version of boot-floppies in JP packages, i.e. bo-jp, hamm-jp, slink-jp. And he is one of main hackers in locale development for ja on glibc2.) In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at "Tue, 4 Jul 2000 22:59:14 +0900", with "not i18ned part in

not i18ned part in b-f 2.2.15

2000-07-04 Thread Akira YOSHIYAMA
Hi all, I'm working to port b-f (cvs) to Linux/98 (Linux for NEC PC-98x1 series) and to translate for Japanese. I found that installed fresh base system (dbootstrap installed it and just rebooted) isn't i18ned because of dpkg-reconfigure and init. In the current b-f, boot-config and dpkg-reconfi