On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:05:31AM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:16:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > On sparc, partman-auto can only partition existing free space, it's not
> > capable of repartitioning a whole disk.
> >
> > So, what's the story behind this, and can it
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:16:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> On sparc, partman-auto can only partition existing free space, it's not
> capable of repartitioning a whole disk.
>
> So, what's the story behind this, and can it be fixed?
I reported this as #237410. It seams like libparted does not r
Sven Luther wrote:
> As said on irc, i believe that the problem is twofold here, that is there are
> two parted bugs/features that influence this :
>
> o parted has a bug showing large partitions, du to it using an int and not a
> larger kind of value. I have a patch for this, and it will go
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:16:29AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> On sparc, partman-auto can only partition existing free space, it's not
> capable of repartitioning a whole disk. Indeed, it does not even present
> that as an option, and if it's preseeded to partition a whole disk
> anyway, we see why:
On sparc, partman-auto can only partition existing free space, it's not
capable of repartitioning a whole disk. Indeed, it does not even present
that as an option, and if it's preseeded to partition a whole disk
anyway, we see why:
/bin/perform_recipe: IN: NEW_PARTITION =dev=ide=host0=bus0=target1
5 matches
Mail list logo