On 3.V.2004 at 18:28 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > Fill wishlist bug reports against partman-auto with subarchitecture
> > recipes. I will see how to implement them.
>
> When do you think will you have time for this?
This or next week.
Anton Zinoviev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-13 00:30]:
> > > I don't need it for a whole arch, but only for a sub-arch. So I guess
> > > partman-auto should check for recipes in:
> >
> > Anton, are you going to implement something like this?
>
> Fill wishlist bug reports against partman-auto w
On 12.IV.2004 at 17:06 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >
> > I don't need it for a whole arch, but only for a sub-arch. So I guess
> > partman-auto should check for recipes in:
> > /lib/partman/recipes/arch/subarch/
> > /lib/partman/recipes/arch
> > /lib/partman/recipes/
> > (in this order)
>
>
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 15:04]:
> > I think that partman-auto should provide different recipes depending
> > on the architecture.
>
> I don't need it for a whole arch, but only for a sub-arch. So I guess
> partman-auto should check for recipes in:
> /lib/partman/recipes/arch/subar
On 5.IV.2004 at 15:56 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> So virtual types like "palo" don't have to be added? I thought you'd
> have to add them, too.
Yes. partman-palo makes parted to think that palo partitions are
linux-swap (an arbitrary choice). This is controlled in
partman-palo/parted_names/pa
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 16:44]:
> > Also, partman-auto hardcodes many things, for example:
> > perform_recipe: ext2|ext3|linux-swap|fat16|fat32)
> > recipes.sh: ext2|ext3|xfs|reiserfs|linux-swap|fat16|fat32)
> > Shouldn't this be gathered on the fly?
>
> These sh
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-05 16:44]:
> > Each recipe is one file, so I could either a) overwrite the recipe
> > with my own or b) modify the file and add the boot partition at the
> > beginning.
>
> I think that partman-auto should provide different recipes depending
> on the a
On 5.IV.2004 at 14:21 Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> Each recipe is one file, so I could either a) overwrite the recipe
> with my own or b) modify the file and add the boot partition at the
> beginning.
I think that partman-auto should provide different recipes depending
on the architecture.
> part
I've a system which needs a small (say 5 megs) boot partition at the
beginning of the disk (ext2 revision 0). I looed at partman-auto
yesterday to see how I can tell it to do the right thing. Ideally,
I'd just like to use the existing recipes (atomic and home), but add a
boot partition at the beg
9 matches
Mail list logo
