Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to
xvda is most natural.
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:39 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:39 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've left any parted enhancements out for now, as you say they would be
a useful further specification in the future.
What do you mean here?
The Unknown
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 12:02 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
I just meant that the Unknown could become Xen Virtual disk in
the future adding a bit more detail to the Virtual disk as Frans
suggests above (I think, quoting a bit complex up there ;-)).
I managed to follow, we're on the same
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to
xvda is most natural.
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 10:20 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've left any parted enhancements out for now, as you say they would
be a useful further specification in the future.
Please post the proposed patch so I can take a look at it.
There is no proposed patch for this bit, Ferenc's
On Sun, 2008-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to
xvda is most natural.
One option would be to just
use Virtual
On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to
xvda is most natural.
One option would be to just
use Virtual disk in partman (without Xen before it). Then parted's
On Sunday 06 April 2008, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
With the attached patch it becomes:
4. XEN virtual disk 1, partition #1 (xvda1) - 5.4 GB Unknown
And similarly for full-disk devices. Now:
* Does it make sense to output the disk number (1,2...)?
IMO, yes. Other disk types also include an
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 10:59 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do you have plans to work on D-I for Xen extensively? If so we should
sync up.
I've just started with this as in my day job I got responsibe for a
couple of Xen machines. Till now I don't
On Tue, 2008-04-08 at 20:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I would vote for starting the numbering at 1, not 0, as linking 1 to xvda is
most natural.
One option would be to just
use Virtual disk in partman (without Xen before it). Then parted's
description would be a useful further
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 15:18 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So here's something to discuss. This is how it used to look like:
OMG, something totally unrelated sneaked into the attached patch,
consider this instead:
Thanks Ferenc, I've commented on
Quoting Ferenc Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+Template: partman/text/xen_virtual_disk
+Type: text
+# eg. XEN virtual disk 1 (xvda)
+# :sl4:
+_Description: XEN virtual disk %s (%s)
+
+Template: partman/text/xen_virtual_partition
+Type: text
+# eg. XEN virtual disk 1, partition #1 (xvda1)
Ian Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 15:18 +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Thanks Ferenc, I've commented on #474556.
Thanks, I replyed there. On speling you are definitely right, I
changed the patch. Starting number, well, do we actually need it at
all?
Do you have
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Ferenc Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+Template: partman/text/xen_virtual_disk
+Type: text
+# eg. XEN virtual disk 1 (xvda)
+# :sl4:
+_Description: XEN virtual disk %s (%s)
+
+Template: partman/text/xen_virtual_partition
+Type: text
+#
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Ferenc Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+Template: partman/text/xen_virtual_disk
+Type: text
+# eg. XEN virtual disk 1 (xvda)
+# :sl4:
+_Description: XEN virtual disk %s (%s)
+
+Template:
Otavio Salvador [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quoting Ferenc Wagner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
+Template: partman/text/xen_virtual_disk
+Type: text
+# eg. XEN virtual disk 1 (xvda)
+# :sl4:
+_Description: XEN
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So here's something to discuss. This is how it used to look like:
OMG, something totally unrelated sneaked into the attached patch,
consider this instead:
Index: packages/partman/partman-base/debian/partman-base.templates
Hi,
So here's something to discuss. This is how it used to look like:
Partition disks
---
This is an overview of your currently configured partitions and mount points.
Select a partition to modify its settings (file system, mount point, etc.), a
free space to create partitions,
Ferenc Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* libparted should also recognize the device type, which isn't much
of a problem (based on a cursory look at the sources). But that
would just duplicate the info on the line at best. Probably
something else is needed... But what?
Current
20 matches
Mail list logo
