Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 09:51:39PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I would really love to see the Installer tested on an ARM notebook. I am > pretty sure that my current T14 AMD¹ will be my last notebook with an x86 > processor. https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/Thinkpad/X13s says "As of Octob

Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

Marc Haber (2025-05-25): > Sadly, the Geizhals database is not always exact-to-the-point in those > technical details. No worries, the more important point to me is: options way under 1000 EUR exist! I'm just glad I spotted the “many variants exist” thing before buying blindly. :) > Maybe you ca

Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 09:38:15PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Marc Haber (2025-05-25): On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 05:38:04AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > If we were able to find something cheap-ish with Wi-Fi 7, e.g. > around 500 EUR, I think it would make sense to have something > self-cont

Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

Hi Marc, Marc Haber (2025-05-25): > On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 05:38:04AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > If we were able to find something cheap-ish with Wi-Fi 7, e.g. > > around 500 EUR, I think it would make sense to have something > > self-contained to play with. Given my main focus is really

Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

d be another laptop that's fine for me. In > case Laptops pile up at your place for testing you might like to hand > over one of the older models to some other DD if you consider a new one > for a good replacement. > > In short: I'll approve your request even for a 1000€ lapt

Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 05:38:04AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: If we were able to find something cheap-ish with Wi-Fi 7, e.g. around 500 EUR, I think it would make sense to have something self-contained to play with. Given my main focus is really Wi-Fi 7 support, 1000+ EUR seems too much. htt

Re: Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

case Laptops pile up at your place for testing you might like to hand over one of the older models to some other DD if you consider a new one for a good replacement. In short: I'll approve your request even for a 1000€ laptop if this is the best solution for your case. Kind regards and thanks

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Hi Marc, Marc Haber (2025-05-15): > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:36:02PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: > > Yes, changing that in the short term seem quite unwise, so I guess a > > rewritten deb822 version of apt-setup, post-release, is what we'll need. > > Has anybody talked to the apt maintainers wh

Tentative reimbursement request for Debian hardware

Hi, For now I'm cc-ing debian-boot@ for information. Feel free to adjust recipients as you see fit. Writing with my D-I release manager hat: Over time it seems newer laptops are getting equipped with Wi-Fi 7 chips, which we don't support currently. If I got the gist right, we support older chips

Re: Bug#1105892: [pre-approval request] unblock: screen/4.9.1-2.1

Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso (2025-05-16): > [Cc'ing as well debian-boot and Cyril, as screen produces a udeb and > needs an ack for d-i, additionally we are freezing udebs for the d-i > preparation] […] > Additionally there is an Upload from Chris Hofstaedtler > which has not yet migrated to test

Bug#1105892: [pre-approval request] unblock: screen/4.9.1-2.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: scr...@packages.debian.org, Axel Beckert (Debian Developer) , Christian Hofstaedtler , debian-boot@lists.debian.org, k...@debian.org, car...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:screen User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:36:02PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote: Yes, changing that in the short term seem quite unwise, so I guess a rewritten deb822 version of apt-setup, post-release, is what we'll need. Has anybody talked to the apt maintainers whether they would be willing to disable the dep

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Cyril Brulebois writes: > Philip Hands (2025-05-15): >> Cyril Brulebois writes: >> >> > The problem is that apt-setup is currently working on a single >> > sources.list file, and having the 60local generator work on a different >> > one would likely mean reworking the debconf automaton quick a

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Cyril Brulebois writes: > The problem is that apt-setup is currently working on a single > sources.list file, and having the 60local generator work on a different > one would likely mean reworking the debconf automaton quick a bunch. It > could also break the CI (mostly run/monitored by the other

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Philip Hands (2025-05-15): > Cyril Brulebois writes: > > > The problem is that apt-setup is currently working on a single > > sources.list file, and having the 60local generator work on a different > > one would likely mean reworking the debconf automaton quick a bunch. It > > could also break t

Re: deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

Hi, [ cc += apt people ] If you feel like you want the very long version of the context, feel free to check: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2025/05/msg00201.html Long story short: of course it'd be better to directly write deb822 data from some template but we would need to overhaul apt-

deb822 support [.sources for apt] in d-i (was: Merge request on apt-setup)

be reviewed and merged before > trixie? This still looks doable *in theory*. Feel free to add it to <https://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/Trixie/Wishlist>. The rest of my answer might look like a rollercoaster regarding your particular request, but I hope in the end you'll see

Re: Merge request on apt-setup

Um… ping ? Le 24/02/2025 à 09:50, Roland Mas a écrit : Hi all, I'd like to give a gentle poke to this list about https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/-/merge_requests/17 For some context, it's used by the Scibian derivative, which has its own APT repositories, some of which req

Merge request on apt-setup

Hi all, I'd like to give a gentle poke to this list about https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/-/merge_requests/17 For some context, it's used by the Scibian derivative, which has its own APT repositories, some of which require extra options in the sources.list lines. For now we

cdrom-detect merge request !5

Hello, There is currently a little bug in the cdrom-detect package which I fixed in this MR : https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/cdrom-detect/-/merge_requests/5. The MR has not yet been reviewed or merged. As I opened this MR some time ago, I wondered if a maintainer could review it. Than

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hi, Am 25. Juli 2024 22:36:13 MESZ schrieb Pascal Hambourg : >> I have created a merge request to increase the size of ESP similar to what >> has >> been done for /boot (in git) shortly: >> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/merge_requests/14 &g

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

On 25/07/2024 at 21:59, Holger Wansing wrote: Pascal Hambourg wrote (Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:47:19 +0200): On 25/07/2024 at 20:38, Holger Wansing wrote: Only on smaller disks it has ~512MB, so that could be changed to ~768MB to be consistent with /boot. OK. But with MIN=806 and PRIO=850 (how

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hi, Pascal Hambourg wrote (Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:47:19 +0200): > Hello, > > On 25/07/2024 at 20:38, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > on big disks (> 10G I guess) the ESP is already 1G > > Actually not. As mentioned in > , the recipe > ha

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

On 25/07/2024 at 21:47, I wrote: Explanation: raw increment factors are normalized on a base 100 and rounded to integers. It means that it a raw increment factor is less ^^ if than 1% of the sum of all increment factors, then the normalized increment fac

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hello, On 25/07/2024 at 20:38, Holger Wansing wrote: on big disks (> 10G I guess) the ESP is already 1G Actually not. As mentioned in , the recipe had MIN=PRIORITY which resulted in the size being stuck to MIN (538 MB) regardless o

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:38:48 +0200): > Hi, > > just to let you know: > I have created a merge request to increase the size of ESP similar to what has > been done for /boot (in git) shortly: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-

Re: Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hi, On Thursday, 25 July 2024 20:38:48 CEST Holger Wansing wrote: > just to let you know: > I have created a merge request to increase the size of ESP similar to what > has been done for /boot (in git) shortly: > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/merge_requests/

Merge request for increasing ESP size

Hi, just to let you know: I have created a merge request to increase the size of ESP similar to what has been done for /boot (in git) shortly: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-auto/-/merge_requests/14 Note: on big disks (> 10G I guess) the ESP is already 1G, so there is noth

apt-setup merge request on Salsa - please comment

Hi guys, we got a merge request on Salsa for apt-setup, with changings to questions/ dialogs in debian-installer regarding firmware: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/apt-setup/-/merge_requests/15 Could someone please review that one? (for example, see https://salsa.debian.org/installer

Bug#1060292: Flash-kernel add Sipeed Lichee Pi 4A - merge request

Merge request: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/flash-kernel/-/merge_requests/54

Re: Bug#1035316: [pre-approval request] unblock: firmware-nonfree/20230210-5

Hi, On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:36:01PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Salvatore Bonaccorso (2023-04-30): > > [ Other info ] > > As beeing the firmware-nonfree package, I'm explicitly CC'ing as well > > Cyril on this pre-approval request. > &

Re: Bug#1035316: [pre-approval request] unblock: firmware-nonfree/20230210-5

Hi, Salvatore Bonaccorso (2023-04-30): > [ Other info ] > As beeing the firmware-nonfree package, I'm explicitly CC'ing as well > Cyril on this pre-approval request. Thanks for that. > Furthermore the attached debdiff still contains the UNRELEASED > changelog entry, w

Bug#1035316: [pre-approval request] unblock: firmware-nonfree/20230210-5

l Cyril on this pre-approval request. Furthermore the attached debdiff still contains the UNRELEASED changelog entry, which will be switched for the upload. The upload adds as well one further additional link for brcmfmac4356-sdio.firefly,firefly-rk3399.txt to mirror all changes upstream did

Re: DebianInstaller Help Request

Hello Marcus, Marcus L. Thompson (2021-07-21): > I need help locating the following information: > > * what processes are called during the "remove-live-packages" routine >which is invoked at the end of the installation process for Debian >10; and > * where the relevant configuration f

DebianInstaller Help Request

Good day. I need help locating the following information: * what processes are called during the "remove-live-packages" routine which is invoked at the end of the installation process for Debian 10; and * where the relevant configuration file(s) for this aspect of the installer's oper

Re: Request for weblate usage in installation-guide Japanese translation (was Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation)

Hi, YOSHINO Yoshihito wrote (Sun, 30 May 2021 10:56:02 +0900): > > Thanks! Now ja translation for d-i reaches 100%. Yeah! Thanks > Likewise, I would also like to update ja translation for > installation-guide on weblate. > I request for debian-installation-guide weblate to ac

Request for weblate usage in installation-guide Japanese translation (was Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation)

>I will activate Japanese on Weblate. > > Done. > > Holger Thanks! Now ja translation for d-i reaches 100%. Likewise, I would also like to update ja translation for installation-guide on weblate. I request for debian-installation-guide weblate to activate Japanese: https://ho

Feature request: battery status / reminder to turn on

Hi, Can i make a feature request to include a reminder to plug in the charger for notebooks when installing debian. This hit me in testing bullseye where i had forgot and the notebook shutdown halfway through the install. I saw that it knew it was running out of power and auto shutdown so I&#

Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation

Hi, Thank you for syncing! Regards, 2021年4月30日(金) 3:27 Holger Wansing : > Hi, > > Kentaro Hayashi wrote (Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:11:25 > +0900): > > By the way, when weblate translation artifacts merged into d-i > periodically? > > Does l10n-sync require an extra configuration or something for

Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation

Hi, Kentaro Hayashi wrote (Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:11:25 +0900): > By the way, when weblate translation artifacts merged into d-i periodically? > Does l10n-sync require an extra configuration or something for Japanese? I sync Weblate regularly into d-i's git repo at Salsa. As I did now today: https:

Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation

2021年4月26日(月) 14:27 Holger Wansing : > > Am 25. April 2021 10:12:13 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : > >>https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/debian-installer/#languages > > > >That's great. > >Thanks for taking care of that. > > > >I will activate Japanese on Weblate. > > Done. > > Holger Thank you f

Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation

Am 25. April 2021 10:12:13 MESZ schrieb Holger Wansing : >>https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/debian-installer/#languages > >That's great. >Thanks for taking care of that. > >I will activate Japanese on Weblate. Done. Holger -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3

Re: Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation

gt;Instead I would like to use weblate for possible reviews. >So I request for d-i weblate to enable Japanese: >https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/debian-installer/#languages That's great. Thanks for taking care of that. I will activate Japanese on Weblate. Holger Hi, -- Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3

Request for weblate usage in d-i Japanese translation

Dear d-i l10n coordinator, I am trying to update ja translation for d-i, while the previous translator kmuto is no longer active. He used to commit all the ja translation things from himself and other translators. Instead I would like to use weblate for possible reviews. So I request for d-i

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

I can try to submit a pull request for linux if needed, but I may need some guidance. I'm going to drop trying to submit a pull request for the linux package for the time being, as I can't quite seem to manage to get the required process to insert CONFIG_MDIO_BCM_UNIMAC=m where

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

without the inclusion of mdio-bcm-unimac.ko in the netinst ARM64 ISOs. I have created an initramfs-tools merge request to attempt to fix the problem, which can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/46 AIUI initramfs-tools rules are not used to build the nic

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

usion of > > mdio-bcm-unimac.ko in the netinst ARM64 ISOs. > > > > I have created an initramfs-tools merge request to attempt to fix the > > problem, which can be found at: > > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/46 > > AIUI in

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

ed an initramfs-tools merge request to attempt to fix the > problem, which can be found at: > https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools/-/merge_requests/46 AIUI initramfs-tools rules are not used to build the nic-modules udeb, it'd rather be happening in the linux package, i

Bug#985956: Merge request submittted to initramfs-tools

, and one can expect a lot more to be if Debian 11 goes to release without the inclusion of mdio-bcm-unimac.ko in the netinst ARM64 ISOs. I have created an initramfs-tools merge request to attempt to fix the problem, which can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/initramfs-tools

Re: Merge request created [Re: Use isenkram to get around the firmware problem?]

Brian Potkin (2021-03-09): > On Mon 08 Mar 2021 at 22:41:53 +0100, Holger Wansing wrote: > > At the bare minimum, I have created a merge request for my > > "introduce a dialog to enter packages for firmware installation" > > approach, so it is at least officially

Re: Merge request created [Re: Use isenkram to get around the firmware problem?]

the end of my path on this issue. > > isenkram is apparently no solution for Bullseye. > > At the bare minimum, I have created a merge request for my "introduce a dialog > to enter packages for firmware installation" approach, so it is at least > officially documented s

Re: Merge request created [Re: Use isenkram to get around the firmware problem?]

Hallo Holger, Holger Wansing (2021-03-08): > Holger Wansing wrote (Sun, 7 Mar 2021 17:02:06 +0100): > > And for the (graphics) firmware problem, isenkram is of no help as it > > seems, > > at least for Bullseye. > > I have reached the end of my path on this issue. > > isenkram is apparently

Re: Merge request created [Re: Use isenkram to get around the firmware problem?]

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:41:53 +0100): > At the bare minimum, I have created a merge request for my "introduce a dialog > to enter packages for firmware installation" approach, so it is at least > officially documented somewhere... Should have added a l

Merge request created [Re: Use isenkram to get around the firmware problem?]

I have created a merge request for my "introduce a dialog to enter packages for firmware installation" approach, so it is at least officially documented somewhere... Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Bug#946476: marked as done (debootstrap: Additional debootstrapable image (PureOS Amber) contributed as a merge request in salsa.)

Your message dated Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:49:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#946476: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.119 has caused the Debian Bug report #946476, regarding debootstrap: Additional debootstrapable image (PureOS Amber) contributed as a merge request in salsa. to be marked as

Bug#946476: debootstrap: Additional debootstrapable image (PureOS Amber) contributed as a merge request in salsa.

and phone. If we could add our system definition to debootstrap in the scripts directory, which this merge request does; https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/merge_requests/37 we would be most grateful. Thank you! -- System Information: Distributor ID: PureOS Description:PureOS

Re: Request add hibmc_drm into buster aarch64 netboot image

On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 13:39 +0800, She Kairui wrote: > Hello， > > I'm trying to install Debian buster on to the Huawei Kunpeng arm64 server, > found that the installation graphic output not show up via the server BMC > virtual console. > > Because Huawei Kunpeng arm64 server BMC chip is hibmc, t

Re: Request add hibmc_drm into buster aarch64 netboot image

She Kairui 于2019年11月7日周四 下午1:40写道： > > Hello， > > I'm trying to install Debian buster on to the Huawei Kunpeng arm64 server, > found that the installation graphic output not show up via the server BMC > virtual console. Generally, BMC driver is used to view/modify configuration inside normal OS

Request add hibmc_drm into buster aarch64 netboot image

Hello， I'm trying to install Debian buster on to the Huawei Kunpeng arm64 server, found that the installation graphic output not show up via the server BMC virtual console. Because Huawei Kunpeng arm64 server BMC chip is hibmc, the OS need hibmc_drm.ko to work with it, currently this kernel modu

Bug#925182: Feature request: Support for QEMU Virtio driver for CD-ROM

Package: debian-installer Followup-For: Bug #925182 This looks to be a duplicate of #689528 Cheers.

Bug#928910: marked as done (feature request: support odroid-hc1)

Your message dated Sun, 12 May 2019 14:55:54 -0700 with message-id <87r293e3rp.fsf@yucca> and subject line Re: Bug#928910: feature request: support odroid-hc1 has caused the Debian Bug report #928910, regarding feature request: support odroid-hc1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#928910: feature request: support odroid-hc1

Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.98 Would it be possible to support odroid-hc1 single board computers with flash-kernel? Here is how I configure the board manually: https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn/OdroidHC1 flash-kernel wouldn't need to deal with samsung firmware blobs, as those get i

Feature request: Support for QEMU Virtio driver for CD-ROM

Package: debian-installer Version: debian-testing-amd64-DVD-1.iso, from 2019-03-16 When installing Debian as a guest in KVM/QEMU assigning the ISO to a CD-ROM using Virtio or Virtio-SCSI as the bus type the debian-installer cannot see the CD-ROM drive and ask for drivers. I assume the Virtio dri

Re: [installation-guide] merge request on Italian translation

Hi Holger, On 21/12/2018 17:41, Holger Wansing wrote: > could you take a minute and look at > https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide/merge_requests/3 > please? > > Should we accept that change? Slight rewording, merge request accepted. Thanks Luca

[installation-guide] merge request on Italian translation

Hi Luca, could you take a minute and look at https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/installation-guide/merge_requests/3 please? Should we accept that change? Thanks Holger -- Holger Wansing PGP-Finterprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076

Re: Access request to Salsa d-i and installation-guide repo

Hi, Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2018 schrieb Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: > Dear colleagues, > > Could some admin of the Salsa repo's add my user (jfs) to both the d-i and > the installation-guide projects in Salsa? Done. Cheers Holger -- Sent from my Jolla phone http://www.jolla.com/

Access request to Salsa d-i and installation-guide repo

Dear colleagues, Could some admin of the Salsa repo's add my user (jfs) to both the d-i and the installation-guide projects in Salsa? I used to have access previously in Alioth but my user was not moved to the new project. I did not needed the access before, but would need it in the coming months

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

On Mi, 21 nov 18, 12:32:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Andrei added to the d-i group, thanks. Many thanks, Andrei -- http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

Hi, Holger Wansing (2018-11-20): > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I just sent a join request on Salsa for installer-team. I would need > > access to update the Romanian translation of d-i, assuming I will > > have the time to work on it (bee

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:44:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Isn’t it enough to just send pull requests with the translation updates? it's maybe enough, but it's so much better and easier and joyful if translaters can commit themselbes. Also it's pretty simple to review these commi

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

> >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> I just sent a join request on Salsa for installer-team. I would need > >>>> access to update the Romanian tra

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

> On Nov 20, 2018, at 10:54 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 9:42 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

Hi, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > On Nov 20, 2018, at 9:42 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I just sent a join request on Salsa for installer-team. I w

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

> On Nov 20, 2018, at 9:42 PM, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I just sent a join request on Salsa for installer-team. I would need >> access to update the Romanian translation of d-i, assuming I will have >&

Re: Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

Hi, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > Hello, > > I just sent a join request on Salsa for installer-team. I would need > access to update the Romanian translation of d-i, assuming I will have > the time to work on it (been inactive the past 3 years or so). Translation update for Romanian

Access request to Salsa for Debian Installer translations (Romanian)

Hello, I just sent a join request on Salsa for installer-team. I would need access to update the Romanian translation of d-i, assuming I will have the time to work on it (been inactive the past 3 years or so). Thanks, Andrei signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#899118: known good example request

On 2018-05-20, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 09:15:38PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: >> >> When looking at the defconfigs for several of these systems, I >> see e.g. CONFIG_BOOTARGS settings that don't really match what I >> would expect for systems using config_distro_bootcmd.h.

Bug#899118: known good example request

On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 09:15:38PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: > > When looking at the defconfigs for several of these systems, I > see e.g. CONFIG_BOOTARGS settings that don't really match what I > would expect for systems using config_distro_bootcmd.h. > Three random examples: > > - r8a77995_d

Re: block-udeb request for e2fsprogs?

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:21 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Hi, > > According to Britney there is a block-udeb request which will prevent > e2fsprogs 1.43.6-1 from migrating to Testing when it has reached the > appropriate amount of aging. Was this left over from the Stretch &g

block-udeb request for e2fsprogs?

Hi, According to Britney there is a block-udeb request which will prevent e2fsprogs 1.43.6-1 from migrating to Testing when it has reached the appropriate amount of aging. Was this left over from the Stretch release or is it SOP that the maintianer for packages in the Installer needs to request

Re: Request to Join Project debian-installer from Christoph Biedl (cbiedl)

nore...@alioth.debian.org (2017-08-08): > Christoph Biedl (cbiedl) has requested to join your project. > You can approve this request here: > https://alioth.debian.org/project/admin/users.php?group_id=30260 > > Comments by the user: > Seems like everybody is around here, s

Re: Request to Join Project debian-installer from Chris Boot (bootc)

nore...@alioth.debian.org (2017-08-07): > Chris Boot (bootc) has requested to join your project. > You can approve this request here: > https://alioth.debian.org/project/admin/users.php?group_id=30260 > > Comments by the user: > Hi KiBi and the team, you may know me as the

Bug#860304: Patch request for U-Boot

I have posted a patch request to U-Boot upstream: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] odroid-c2: make fdtfile conform with README.pxe https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2017-April/288581.html Best regards Heinrich Schuchardt

request for review of proposed changes

Hi, I've pushed minimal changes to the git branch "proposed" of partman-btrfs. Would someone please take a look at them and let me know if they look good? I'm sure I'm forgetting something... That said, the solution I'm proposing doesn't require translation ;-) Kind regards, Nicholas signatu

Ad request

Dear Admin, I'm Lisa Kok and I run Misshowtostartablog.com, a website which helps bloggers getting started with blogging. We would like to post a widget with the top 5 of this months' most popular articles of our website on your website, to promote our website. In exchange, you would receive a

Bug#751955: marked as done (initramfs-tools: Warning: error while trying to store keymap file - ignoring request to install /etc/boottime.kmap.gz)

Your message dated Thu, 03 Mar 2016 11:21:32 + with message-id and subject line Bug#751955: fixed in console-setup 1.138 has caused the Debian Bug report #751955, regarding initramfs-tools: Warning: error while trying to store keymap file - ignoring request to install /etc/boottime.kmap.gz

Re: request

> The mailinglist you are addressing is about development of debian-installer, > > not for user requests. > > But this is clearly a request for a change in the debian installer -- > that it provide more information on one kind of failure. Now it may be > legitimate t

Re: request

formation and what procedure to do that for the people don't have the > > time to study the debian. > > > > so.. how i could resolve this problem , any help from you, please > > > > robert, waiting for your response > > The mailinglist you are addressing is

Re: request

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 03:06:14PM +0200, Moreanu Robert - Nicolae wrote: > i looking to resolve this problem when I want to install debian 8.2 or 8.1. > I receive this message after it's take to Grub install > > " the 'grub-pc' package failed to install into /target/ " > after the operation of cl

request

i looking to resolve this problem when I want to install debian 8.2 or 8.1. I receive this message after it's take to Grub install " the 'grub-pc' package failed to install into /target/ " after the operation of clean up on installing, i have a failed operations. I don't have such expertise, plea

Bug#751955: initramfs-tools: Warning: error while trying to store keymap file - ignoring request to install /etc/boottime.kmap.gz

On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:56:52 +0200 Clement Hermann wrote: > [...] > Not sure why this wasn't setup by default even though the other > variables where, though. > [...] In my case changing keyboard layout settings in Gnome resulted in the XKBMODEL being deleted from /etc/default/keyboard. Steps to

Processed: re-request block

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 805792 by 771864 Bug #805792 [cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: support for excluding dependencies 805792 was not blocked by any bugs. 805792 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 805792: 771864 > thanks Stopping processing here. Pl

Re: Request to Join Project debian-installer from Vagrant Cascadian (vagrant) Welcome

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:04:08AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > nore...@alioth.debian.org (2015-05-28): > > Vagrant Cascadian (vagrant) has requested to join your project. > > Approved. Nice! Welcome Vagrant. Yes, I know, you were allready with us. Groeten Geert Stappers Who appreciates

Re: Request to Join Project debian-installer from Vagrant Cascadian (vagrant)

Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > So if it makes sense for me to have commit access, great, if not, I'll > > keep submitting patches and bug reports. > > I don't think both approaches are exclusive. Feel free to push stuff > you're comfortable with, and to file bug reports with patch

Re: Request to Join Project debian-installer from Vagrant Cascadian (vagrant)

Heya, (Taking the liberty of quoting your comments to the list.) nore...@alioth.debian.org (2015-05-28): > Vagrant Cascadian (vagrant) has requested to join your project. Approved. > Comments by the user: > > I wonder if it wouldn't make sense for me to have commit access to > flash-kernel a

Re: Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

On 2015-04-17 18:22, Martin Pitt wrote: Hello Niels, Niels Thykier [2015-04-17 17:55 +0200]: Just to clarify, are we still intending to do a systemd update prior to Jessie with -17 and then now also a p-u (i.e. for 8.1) for ecryptfs? That's still my intent, yes, primarily to avoid people who

Re: Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

Hello Niels, Niels Thykier [2015-04-17 17:55 +0200]: > Just to clarify, are we still intending to do a systemd update prior to > Jessie with -17 and then now also a p-u (i.e. for 8.1) for ecryptfs? That's still my intent, yes, primarily to avoid people who have this set up in wheezy already (#751

Re: Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

On 2015-04-17 15:44, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello all, > > Cyril Brulebois [2015-04-17 14:15 +0200]: >> I tried to follow the code path in Ubuntu, which offers this option, to >> track down where the offset can come from; and see whether Debian was >> affected. I didn't mean to imply that Debian pro

Re: Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

Hello all, Cyril Brulebois [2015-04-17 14:15 +0200]: > I tried to follow the code path in Ubuntu, which offers this option, to > track down where the offset can come from; and see whether Debian was > affected. I didn't mean to imply that Debian proposes the same option, > as it does not. Ah ok,

Re: Bug#782712: pre-upload unblock request: systemd/215-17 for RC bug #751707

On 17/04/15 13:51, Martin Pitt wrote: > BTW, 215-16 still didn't hit testing, so I didn't upload -17 yet. I'll > do as soon as it migrates. systemd| 215-16 | testing | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x systemd| 215-16 |

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >