Re: signature invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006)

2006-12-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 20:42:21 -0500, Rick Thomas wrote: On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: Does anybody know why I'm getting this message when I do aptitude update W: GPG error: http://mirrors.usc.edu etch Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG

Re: signature invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006)

2006-12-06 Thread Rick Thomas
On Dec 6, 2006, at 3:43 AM, Florian Kulzer wrote: There seems to be some confusion between two different issues: 1) There is a new archive signing key for Etch. The Release files are currently signed with both the new and the old key. Apt is satisfied with the old signature, but it

Re: signature invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006)

2006-12-06 Thread Florian Kulzer
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 08:10:45 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: Florian Kulzer writes: More likely, however, there is just a synchronization problem with the MIT mirror. You can get the bad signature error if you update while the mirror in the middle of its synchronization procedure. If

Re: signature invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006)

2006-12-05 Thread Rick Thomas
On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: Does anybody know why I'm getting this message when I do aptitude update W: GPG error: http://mirrors.usc.edu etch Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 010908312D230C5F Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) [EMAIL