* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100521 08:01]:
> On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > I also fixed hppa today
> >
> > Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
> > initial run.
>
> Ping. hppa is still not bein
On Friday 21 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > I also fixed hppa today
> >
> > Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
> > initial run.
>
> Ping. hppa is still not being built a
On Saturday 15 May 2010, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I also fixed hppa today
>
> Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
> initial run.
Ping. hppa is still not being built automatically.
TIA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
On Sunday 09 May 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I also fixed hppa today
Great, but seems to have a similar problem as ppc had: not built since
initial run.
TIA,
FJP
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100509 18:44]:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I just reenabled powerpc btw
>
> Does not seem to have been built since 3 Apr. Forgot to enable in crontab?
should be ok now.
I also fixed hppa today, and will fix ppc soon.
Andi
--
To UNSU
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I just reenabled powerpc btw
Does not seem to have been built since 3 Apr. Forgot to enable in crontab?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
On Tuesday 06 April 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I'm not sure if I understand this correctly. But i think it would be
> very helpfull to debug problems if the build log of failed builds is
> available somewhere and linked from the daily builds webpage.
As an aside, because IIUC the build enviro
On Tuesday 06 April 2010, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I'm not sure if I understand this correctly. But i think it would be
> very helpfull to debug problems if the build log of failed builds is
> available somewhere and linked from the daily builds webpage.
Please read the daily-build script: if the
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:36:15AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case
> the build-script doesn't return true.
>
> I think it makes sense to transfer the log anyways. Does it make sense
> as well to change the symlink (or: shoul
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100403 20:36]:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case
> > the build-script doesn't return true.
>
> I think that's fine. If individual build targets fail then the build as a
> who
On Saturday 03 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> one further thing: As it is now, the helper script will abort in case
> the build-script doesn't return true.
I think that's fine. If individual build targets fail then the build as a
whole should still succeed. AFAICT what you do now is consisten
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100401 21:41]:
> Thanks for getting amd64 going again so fast.
>
> On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > As of now, we can't move the armel builds yet (as we are waiting for
> > the new debian machines to be setup). I hope to not forget to mention
> >
Thanks for getting amd64 going again so fast.
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> As of now, we can't move the armel builds yet (as we are waiting for
> the new debian machines to be setup). I hope to not forget to mention
> it once we have the new machines running.
>
> For i386, I d
* Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org) [100401 19:55]:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> > OK. I guess we'll get back to you on that. I'd like to hear what Joey
> > thinks of that as he currently runs two arches, including i386.
>
> I would like to get rid of the dedicated machine I have running for
> the armel build
Frans Pop wrote:
> OK. I guess we'll get back to you on that. I'd like to hear what Joey
> thinks of that as he currently runs two arches, including i386.
I would like to get rid of the dedicated machine I have running for
the armel builds. Don't really care about the i386 build overhead, but
als
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100401 15:08]:
> > On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > If the build-only could also be more verbose (i.e. logging during
> > > build) I'd appreciate that even more.
> >
> > Would it be OK if you hav
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100401 15:08]:
> On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If the build-only could also be more verbose (i.e. logging during build)
> > I'd appreciate that even more.
>
> Would it be OK if you have to set 'LOG_TO_STDOUT=1' for that in the
> environment
On Thursday 01 April 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100331 21:38]:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > The "svn update" inside the chroot fails now - nothing to worry, but
> > > would be nice if that wouldn't happen.
> >
> > Looks like you curre
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> And a last question for both you and the D-I team.
>
> Should we now set up all arches this way, or do people want to keep their
> existing builds? I would be happy to have the s390 builds (which I
> currently run) done on a buildd.
I think that the mo
* Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl) [100331 21:38]:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > The "svn update" inside the chroot fails now - nothing to worry, but
> > would be nice if that wouldn't happen.
>
> Looks like you currently call 'daily-build build' which also does an
> update.
On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I started to successfully resurrect the first daily builds. This mail
> documents what I have done, and what needs to be done.
Thanks a lot for this Andi. I'll also document this in our Wiki based on
your info.
> What could be better
> ~
Hi,
I started to successfully resurrect the first daily builds. This mail
documents what I have done, and what needs to be done. The
precondition for the new scripts are lvm snapshots to be available, so
this doesn't work unchanged for kfreebsd.
Also, I had to remove all unrestricted keys on d-i.
22 matches
Mail list logo
