Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
That's not what I call KISS. Main problem is that in ~2 years time
someone will have to untangle what exactly is legacy and what is not.
Yes, your version is easier to cleanup after squeeze goes out.
Please go ahead and commit it. I'll
+ Frans Pop (Thu, 21 May 2009 00:12:59 +0200):
+ ... dpkg -s passwd | sed -n '/^Version:/s,^Version: ,,p')
FWIW that can be written just as `sed -n 's/^Version: //p'`, since p
will only print if a substitution was made, but what you probably want
is `dpkg-query -W -f '${Version}\n' passwd`,
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the -m switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
Does this mean it is no longer possible to preseed using
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the -m switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
Does
Hello Christian,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org wrote:
- another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
understand: he'll propose a patch soon
I'm sending the attached patch for people to comment. My idea is that
the lenny.sh script to be
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the -m switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello Christian,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org
wrote:
- another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
understand: he'll propose a patch soon
I'm sending the attached patch for
Hello,
Here goes a fixed patch for review.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 607dc2fe724748617498d79f22be82816f95014e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
here.
KISS! Especially because the risk is huge that you will only find bugs in
such code _after_ you've already released.
Hello Frans,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
here.
I'd love to know what I missed, if
Hello,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain. Anyway
an alternative patch is attached.
I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call, locally.
--
Otavio Salvador
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
complexity here.
I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain.
Try a grep for codename. It's a
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call,
locally.
Which means you're still missing it in the dpkg -s call?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hello Frans,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
complexity here.
I'd love to
14 matches
Mail list logo
