On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 10:56:24AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > libdetect. Someone KILL libdetect.
> >
> > It has fledgling PPC support, but it's (A) hacked together awfully (B)
> > a little lacking in correctness (C) nowhere near compiling. I got it
> > to build once, with two hours work,
> libdetect. Someone KILL libdetect.
>
> It has fledgling PPC support, but it's (A) hacked together awfully (B)
> a little lacking in correctness (C) nowhere near compiling. I got it
> to build once, with two hours work, but not function.
hmm.. drow, I'd like to talk to you about this more...
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:34:52PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 2.4.1 kernel.org does not build on PPC. Sigh.
>
> 2.4.0 is ok, right? I guess I'll hold off of 2.4.1 for now..
Not sure.
> > Other architectures will want a radically simplified detection scheme.
> > PPC
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:07:28PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I just tried compiling stuff by hand for hurd-i386, the following
> components form cvs compile fine
>
> anna
> cdebconf
> choose-mirror
> main-menu
> udpkg
> wget
Can you compile and upload the packages? There is currently no func
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:34:52PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 2.4.1 kernel.org does not build on PPC. Sigh.
>
> 2.4.0 is ok, right? I guess I'll hold off of 2.4.1 for now..
2.4.0 is even worse (read useless) on powerpc. (linus merged some
2.4 powerpc code in 2.4.1 b
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> 2.4.1 kernel.org does not build on PPC. Sigh.
2.4.0 is ok, right? I guess I'll hold off of 2.4.1 for now..
> Other architectures will want a radically simplified detection scheme.
> PPC (mostly) has no legacy ISA or such; everything should show up in
> the kernel's P
Ben Collins wrote:
> Well sparc needs three kernels. sun4cdm, sun4dm-pci and sun4u. I can get
> you configs, but the problem being that I have no idea what kernel
> source you are building. I would hope that you plan to integrate to
> 2.4.x sooner or later, but how will you notify ports of this ne
Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I tried dpkg-buildpackage on a couple of these they fail because they
> need debhelper which i couldnt install because it depends on dpkg which
> conflicts with dpkg-hurd, no doubt this is why autobuilders would fail.
> I havent look any deeper yet.
>
i should have said d
Joey Hess wrote:
>
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > I can understand it being the first milestone, but it seems to be the
> > only focus, and nothing is being considered as to how it affects other
> > ports.
>
> A glance at the debian archive shows that this many udebs have been ported:
>
> joeyh@auric
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:09:28PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> > I can understand it being the first milestone, but it seems to be the
> > only focus, and nothing is being considered as to how it affects other
> > ports.
>
> That's not entirely true; I know of a group (who I ca
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:09:28PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> b. Send me an appropriate kernel config and related information, and build
>kernel-image-di once I integrate it.
Well sparc needs three kernels. sun4cdm, sun4dm-pci and sun4u. I can get
you configs, but the problem being that I have
Ben Collins wrote:
> I can understand it being the first milestone, but it seems to be the
> only focus, and nothing is being considered as to how it affects other
> ports.
That's not entirely true; I know of a group (who I cannot name or go
into any detail on since they told me about this privat
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 06:34:59AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > For sparc, there has to be atleast two different boot kernels. One for
> > sun4cdm (32bit CPU), and one for sun4u (64bit CPU). SPARC also supports
> > native netbooting (via RARP/TFTP). My main concer
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> For sparc, there has to be atleast two different boot kernels. One for
> sun4cdm (32bit CPU), and one for sun4u (64bit CPU). SPARC also supports
> native netbooting (via RARP/TFTP). My main concern is whether or not it
^
One of the things
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 02:12:43PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > I'm sitting here looking at an obvious build failure for
> > kernel-image-di on the sparc buildd, and I'm wondering what the heck
> > this package is for anyway. I mean, is this thing supposed to be
> > po
Ben Collins wrote:
>
> I'm sitting here looking at an obvious build failure for
> kernel-image-di on the sparc buildd, and I'm wondering what the heck
> this package is for anyway. I mean, is this thing supposed to be
> portable? If it is, it sucks at doing so, and if it's not, then is it
> the i
I'm sitting here looking at an obvious build failure for
kernel-image-di on the sparc buildd, and I'm wondering what the heck
this package is for anyway. I mean, is this thing supposed to be
portable? If it is, it sucks at doing so, and if it's not, then is it
the intention that non-i386 is left o
17 matches
Mail list logo
