On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:22:52PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As I said on this list several times, I would appreciate it if someone
> > would make boot floppies use libbogl0 and bogl-bterm instead. Every
> > patch that goes i
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:09:35PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > > > Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem
> > > > in bogl-bterm which imp
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:00PM -0700, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> As I said on this list several times, I would appreciate it if someone
> would make boot floppies use libbogl0 and bogl-bterm instead.
It's on my TODO list. I would have done it today, but the build
takes much longer then I expe
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:09:35PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > > Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem
> > > in bogl-bterm which impede bterm working without libutf8.
> >
> > So do we actually stick to libutf
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem
> > in bogl-bterm which impede bterm working without libutf8.
>
> So do we actually stick to libutf8 or try to make it work with
> glibc?
We make it work with glibc.
Done.
CVS lo
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:07:22AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
>
> Thanks! Now we have to check newt-utf8 by Enrique, then check the problem
> in bogl-bterm which impede bterm working without libutf8.
So do we actually stick to libutf8 or try to make it work with
glibc?
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsi
Hi, Enrique. I've checked your rebuilt packages, and it seems to work.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:20:37 +0100,
on Re: woody bf-utf8 (Re: slang, boot-floppies, and wide character support),
Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:11:29AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
> Hi, Jim. This utf8 enabled slang1 packages seems to be OK for me.
> There might be problems which I can't find, and there may be some
> packages which need to be rebuilt. But we need this utf8 support
> in slang1 in order to bui
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 12:11:29AM +0900, Taketoshi Sano wrote:
[...]
> Hi, Enrique. As far as I checked, this libnewt-utf8-0 does not work
> with the utf8 enabled slang1 packages above (pppconfig failed at
> internal error). Please rebuilt them with the new slang1 packages,
> and then upload th
Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So we should provide libutf8 package, or make bogl-bterm statically
> > linked to libutf8 library.
>
> Bruno Haible's page states that libutf8 is needed only libc versions
> below 2.2. So, 2.2.2-4 should work fine.
This is correct. I stopped using lib
Taketoshi Sano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now, when we'll get those utf8-enabled slang1 and newt packages,
> we might also need bogl-bterm to show utf8 messages. And it requires
> libutf8 (and the root priviledge) to work well even on the current
> unstable (i.e. with our libc6_2.2.2-4 packag
11 matches
Mail list logo
