Quoting Anton Zinoviev (an...@lml.bas.bg):
Good to here this.
Should I make small console-setup-mini-udeb without translations?
Well, I'm not sure we have a use case for it. The point of having no
translations is to make the udeb smaller but, as c-s udeb is included
in the initrd, that
tags 529475 patch
thanks
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Both this bug and #528610 should probably be reassigned to passwd,
severity critical (breaks other software).
#528610 apparently has a workaround (using usermod) but there is
apparently none for this bug
There's
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 529475 patch
Bug#529475: user-setup fails because -m option is no longer valid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.36
Severity: normal
You should not use dpkg --print-installation-architecture otherwise
starting with the upcoming dpkg 1.15.1 you will get annoying warnings like
this:
dpkg: warning: obsolete option '--print-installation-architecture', please
use
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
found 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without
warning
Bug marked as found in version 1.35 and reopened.
found 527641 1.36
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup
found 527641 1.35
found 527641 1.36
thanks
On Fri, 08 May 2009, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
I have set the severity of this bug report to serious because,
technically, it is a policy violation to overwrite user changes to file
in /etc;
This is the real problem this bug is about... so closing it with
Christian Perrier, le Wed 20 May 2009 08:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
In low memory mode, translations will be dropped anyway.
When using templates, yes. But here translations are included directly
in the .config script because we need to mangle the answers.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Quoting Steven Sciame (sasci...@yahoo.com):
Hello,
Thank you for the reply. I typed in wireless because that was the ESSID
that I wanted to connect to, but it didn't work and without a connection you
can only get so far with the install. It seemed like it would be fine all
the way
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
Christian Perrier, le Wed 20 May 2009 08:06:55 +0200, a écrit :
In low memory mode, translations will be dropped anyway.
When using templates, yes. But here translations are included directly
in the .config script because we need to mangle
hi,
I tried setting export DISKTYPE=CD700 in debian-cd's CONF.sh, but
when i run easy-build.sh to build a CD image, the image size always
remains below 650MB. What could the problem be? I also tried adding
more packages to debian-cd/tasks/lenny/forcd1 (to add more packages in
CD1? - i hope i am
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
To fix it, you have to:
1/ document in the file that it's auto-updated based on the debconf
infos and that dpkg-reconfigure console-setup is recommended to update
it 2/ use ucf or something similar to detect if the file has been
edited by the
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:21:10AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
found 527641 1.35
found 527641 1.36
thanks
If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more
information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it occur, what was
the contents of the configuration file
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
notfound 527641 1.35
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites /etc/default/console-setup without
warning
Bug no longer marked as found in version 1.35.
notfound 527641 1.36
Bug#527641: Package installation overwrites
notfound 527641 1.35
notfound 527641 1.36
retitle 527641 doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters
close 527641 1.35
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more
information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it
user-setup_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
user-setup_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.24_all.udeb
user-setup_1.24.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.dsc
user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.24.tar.gz
user-setup_1.24_all.deb
to
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:45:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Well, when I reported #528033, something had lost my bepo setting
on upgrade without me doing dpkg-reconfigure console-setup. I assumed
it was already reported since 527641 said Package installation overwrites
Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:04 +
with message-id e1m6k1k-0002cr...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#529475: fixed in user-setup 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #529475,
regarding user-setup fails because -m option is no longer valid
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Wed, 20 May 2009 11:32:04 +
with message-id e1m6k1k-0002cp...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#528610: fixed in user-setup 1.24
has caused the Debian Bug report #528610,
regarding chpasswd encrypted option is gone
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
#console-setup (1.37) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
#
# * Use dpkg --print-architecture debconf config script. Closes: #529574
#
package console-setup-sun5-ekmap console-setup-fonts-udeb bdf2psf
console-setup-ataritt-ekmap console-setup-pc-ekmap
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the -m switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
Does this mean it is no longer possible to preseed using
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the -m switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+libpam-runtime, so MD5 by default.
Does
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.dsc
linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6_1.56.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.79_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
squashfs-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
kernel-image-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
ext2-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-amd64-2.6/ata-modules-2.6.29-2-amd64-di_1.56_amd64.udeb
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-486-di_1.79_i386.udeb
acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.29-2-686-bigmem-di_1.79_i386.udeb
(CC me on replies, please)
Hi!
Sorry if this issue was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
For
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Sorry if this issue was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
that some packages are installed but don't
Hi!
Frans Pop schrieb:
Sorry if this issue was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I see
that some packages are installed but don't see to be needed.
For example
Accepted:
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25.dsc
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/user-setup/user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
to
As I described in an earlier post, it didn't work refers to the error
message telling me that, Configuration of the wireless network failed. Either
I got the name wrong or it is taking too long to connect. Something to that
effect.
I tried to continue on as long as I could, but you
Hi,
glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while.
The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to
unblock them?
Thanks,
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
`- future understand
Hi Frans!
On Wed, 20 May 2009 17:31:04 +0200
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Frans Pop schrieb:
Sorry if this issue was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
FYI: The status of the kernel-wedge source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 2.57
Current version: 2.58
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
user-setup_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp.upload.debian.org
along with the files:
user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:15:20PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
When choosing an origin (for instance Albania) that only has one layout, it
is kinda useless to ask about the layout...as only one choice is possible.
So I propose skipping that question in such case.
Debconf doesn't ask such
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Frans Pop schrieb:
Sorry if this issue was already discussed and if this is not a
problem, but when installing a basic Debian system (only the
minimal system, without selecting anything when tasksel appears), I
see that some
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal
The config script takes great care to provide sane defaults for the keyboard
layout, depending on language and/or language/country settings.
For that reason, I think that the priority of the console-setup/layout
question should be high and not
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Once one has gone through the Configure the keyboard step in D-I (indeed a
modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of kbd-config), it is
not possible to come over the questions again.
Reselecting the
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:27:43PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
The config script takes great care to provide sane defaults for the keyboard
layout, depending on language and/or language/country settings.
For that reason, I think that the priority of the console-setup/layout
question
Hello Christian,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org wrote:
- another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
understand: he'll propose a patch soon
I'm sending the attached patch for people to comment. My idea is that
the lenny.sh script to be
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
+user-setup (1.24) unstable; urgency=low
+ [ Christian Perrier ]
+ * No longer use the -m switch of chpasswd. It uses PAM now and no
+longer has this switch. The password will use settings from
+
user-setup_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
user-setup_1.25.dsc
user-setup_1.25.tar.gz
user-setup-udeb_1.25_all.udeb
user-setup_1.25_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 07:12:57PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Once one has gone through the Configure the keyboard step in D-I
(indeed a modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of
kbd-config), it is not possible to come
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hello Christian,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org
wrote:
- another solution proposed by otavio that I haven't been able to
understand: he'll propose a patch soon
I'm sending the attached patch for
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal
Once one has gone through the Configure the keyboard step in D-I (indeed a
modified D-I where console-setup-udeb is used in place of kbd-config), it is
not possible to come over the questions again.
Reselecting the Configure the keyboard menu entry
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
Still using the minimal install example (without selection standard
system nor other task), shouldn't them have their priority lowered
then?
Possibly. But that is something that probably should have been done
*before* lenny was released.
Package: console-setup-udeb
Severity: normal
When choosing an origin (for instance Albania) that only has one layout, it
is kinda useless to ask about the layout...as only one choice is possible.
So I propose skipping that question in such case.
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Hello,
Here goes a fixed patch for review.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
From 607dc2fe724748617498d79f22be82816f95014e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
here.
KISS! Especially because the risk is huge that you will only find bugs in
such code _after_ you've already released.
Hello Frans,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I belive this does all right now. Patch attached.
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the complexity
here.
I'd love to know what I missed, if
Hello,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote:
I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain. Anyway
an alternative patch is attached.
I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call, locally.
--
Otavio Salvador
Hi,
eglibc 2.9-12 is now in the archive for more than ten days, but it is
not considered by britney because the version tracking does not work
with the source package name change.
The current RC bugs are already present in testing. One is already fixed
in the SVN and will be closed in 2.9-13.
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
complexity here.
I'd love to know what I missed, if you don't mind to explain.
Try a grep for codename. It's a
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
I've already added the missing $ROOT in dpkg --compare-versions call,
locally.
Which means you're still missing it in the dpkg -s call?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
package: choose-mirror
tags 517644 + reopen
thanks
Hi,
I just tried to use the lenny installer to install an etch i386 system.
The same issue as before occurs, see the /var/log/installer/syslog
extract below.
I redid the install with suite=oldstable in the PXE boot line and got
the same
Hello Frans,
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl wrote:
No, it's still broken. You're seriously underestimating the
complexity here.
I'd love to
60 matches
Mail list logo
