quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
Accepted:
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc
to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.dsc
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz
to main/q/quik-installer/quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1.tar.gz
quik-installer_0.0.24+nmu1_powerpc.udeb
to
Comments/Problems:
My Intel Wireless 5100 AGN was detected, but needed a firmware driver(not a
problem). My ethernet card was/is not detected.
My hard drive driver was not detected during install, but was able to install
anyway when I selected to continue without loading a driver. My
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:58:54 +0200
with message-id 20100717055854.gm3...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org
and subject line Re: Bug#589365: installation-reports: Debian Testing(Squeeze)
a success.
has caused the Debian Bug report #589365,
regarding installation-reports: Debian
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:02:06 +
with message-id e1oa0to-0002gl...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#587928: fixed in quik-installer 0.0.24+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #587928,
regarding quik-installer: fails to detect ext2 boot partition
to be marked as done.
here's the diff for the uploaded NMU:
diff -Nru quik-installer-0.0.24/debian/changelog
quik-installer-0.0.24+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- quik-installer-0.0.24/debian/changelog 2010-07-11 13:42:03.0
-0700
+++ quik-installer-0.0.24+nmu1/debian/changelog 2010-07-16 22:10:11.0
Quoting Vagrant Cascadian (vagr...@freegeek.org):
here's the diff for the uploaded NMU:
Thanks. It's committed to SVN now.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Now that l10n updates and uploads happened in preparation of Debian
Installer squeeze beta 1 release, I could add two new packages to the
list of packages which templates are aggregated together in Debian
Installer PO files: partmand-btrfs and partman-ufs
These packages' strings are very similar
[Daniel Richard G.]
Of course; it is attached.
Looking at that, it doesn't appear that cron is responsible for pulling
in exim4*; cron is installed much earlier in the process. heirloom-mailx
is installed at the same time as exim4*, but that one only Suggests:
exim4. It seems possible that
Package: debian-installer? partman-* ? don't know
Version: Ubuntu 10.04 installer.
I send this bug-report to you, as the partman-auto package maintained
by debian bug tracker (https://launchpad.net/partman-auto)
I Unable to install Ubuntu 10.04 server because old LVM pvolume appear
after
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 09:56+0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
The obvious fix is to change popularity-contest to suggest instead of
recommend, to avoid pulling in a MTA when popularity-contest is
installed. Cc to the maintainer list to see if that is an interesting
alternative.
Hunh. I wasn't
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:46:15 +0200
with message-id 201007171046.16291.elen...@planet.nl
and subject line Re: Bug#589213: Do not install Exim in minimal system
has caused the Debian Bug report #589213,
regarding Do not install Exim in minimal system
to be marked as done.
This means
[Daniel Richard G.]
Yes, I see that... what is it now, the --no-recommends switch is broken?
Nope. Your installation simply used version 0.26, which is one
version before the change was introduced.
I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for
popularity-contest, which I believe i a
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I eagerly await Bills view on the proposed change for
popularity-contest, which I believe i a better place to implement the
change.
No, it is not reasonable to ask packages to change functionally correct and
policy-compliant dependencies
Accepted:
s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc
s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26.tar.gz
s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-dasd/s390-dasd_0.0.26_s390.udeb
Override entries for your package:
s390-dasd_0.0.26.dsc - source
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.23_s390.udeb
Override entries for your
Hi,
Philip Hands p...@hands.com wrote:.
BTW, is there any reason why not install Etch from floppy instead of
Sarge?
No, none -- I thought I'd checked that. Actually, I think what actually
happened is that I found the sarge link first, checked for etch, found
it and then must have pasted
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: netinst
Image version: netinst iso from 14 jul 10 to within a day or 2
Date: Date and time of the install
Machine: White box; VIA KT266/A mobo:Athlon 2000 :Nvidia MX4000: LG Flatron
W1942T monitor
FYI: The status of the partman-auto source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 89
Current version: 92
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-crypto source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 12
Current version: 14
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-lvm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 33
Current version: 35
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-base source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 140
Current version: 142
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-auto-raid source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 15
Current version: 16
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the partman-basicfilesystems source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 63
Current version: 64
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the partman-crypto source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 40
Current version: 44
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-efi source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 20
Current version: 21
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-basicmethods source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 43
Current version: 45
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will
FYI: The status of the partman-jfs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 30
Current version: 31
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-lvm source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 68
Current version: 71
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-ext3 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 58
Current version: 60
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
FYI: The status of the partman-md source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 49
Current version: 52
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive
later
reassign 589404 xserver-xorg
thanks
Quoting Chris Barnard (cb...@westnet.com.au):
Comments/Problems:
Failed to configure display to 1440 x 900. Config was 4 x 3 aspect ratio;
sorry I don't remember exactly which numbers. I was
surprised because Lenny gets it right with no problems and a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 589404 xserver-xorg
Bug #589404 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Squeeze fails to
configure monitor
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'xserver-xorg'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
I need to add such a file, but svn add apparently chokes on it:
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-characters
LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin
svn: warning: 'sr' not found
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-characters
LC_ALL=C
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:58:21 +0100
with message-id 20100717175821.gf12...@riva.ucam.org
and subject line Re: Bug#589379: Unable to install Ubuntu because old LVM
pvolume appear after automatic partitioning
has caused the Debian Bug report #589379,
regarding Unable to install
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
I need to add such a file, but svn add apparently chokes on it:
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I
images and as the Recommends in popcon is functionally correct, there
is absolutely zero need to make any changes in popcon.
Okay, now I'm a little confused.
So I see in the
(Daniel: sorry for the private duplicate of this mail; no need to CC me.)
On Saturday 17 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 13:35+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
So: as the reported issue is already fixed in current daily built D-I
images and as the Recommends in popcon is
03w
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c422f8a.f7f2f...@diamondv.com
w
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c422f20.458bf...@unisys.com
Package: live-installer-launcher
When using live-installer-launcher and d-i can't find a installer medium
and you go back to the main menu, the 'Abort the installation' item
doesn't work.
I guess this is something similar as with the 'Exit' item we had and
which was fixed in main-menu 1.30 and
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a
current D-I alpha 1 image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari.
These received a refresh a few days ago:
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
On Sat, 2010 Jul 17 21:40+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm not sure what image was used by the bug reporter, but I assume a
current D-I alpha 1 image. The alpha1 images date from mid Februari.
These received a refresh a few days ago:
On Sun, 2010 Jul 18 04:46+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
No, that's no update. Only a date change for some reason. The images
are still identical to the alpha1 release from February. One way to
see that is to check the kernel version: it uses 2.6.30 instead of
2.6.32. Another is to check the
On Sunday 18 July 2010, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
So if I had used the one from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/installer-amd64/current/
images/netboot/
it would have worked?
No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from the
page I referred to! For
On Sun, 2010 Jul 18 06:09+0200, Frans Pop wrote:
No. Those are *not* daily built images. Follow the relevant links from
the page I referred to! For netboot you need other images.
Oh, right---I see the different set of links, that go to various places
(e.g. people.debian.org) not in the
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin svn: warning: 'sr' not found
bubu...@mykerinos:~/src/debian/debian-installer/installer/build/needed-c
haracters LC_ALL=C svn add s...@latin
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
We're now in July, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
work on June 2010 archives.
More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
Please note that last month saw a discussion about whether it's good
or not to
50 matches
Mail list logo
