Package: debian-installer-launcher
Version: 10
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I've added debian-installer-launcher to the package list of a debian-live image
based on wheezy with gnome; when trying to run it the system complains that the
command
su-to-root is missing.
The relevant line in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 663504 debian-installer
Bug #663504 [netinst] Wheezy netinstaller doesn not search inserted media for
additional files
Warning: Unknown package 'netinst'
Bug reassigned from package 'netinst' to 'debian-installer'.
Bug No longer marked
severity 663638 wishlist
thanks
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 02:26:46AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
Package: debian-cd
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
Going to http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/jigdo-dvd/
we do not get any idea something is wrong apart from the date. Going
Hi
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:17:48 +0100, Max Linke max_linke-deb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello
I would like to know if it is a appropriate project for GSoC
to add WPA2 support for the debian installer.
As others already said, basic WPA2 support ist available in the
installer. Although the user
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 11:18:14AM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
debootstrap's current download error handling isn't very robust. It
declares success just for the presence of a downloaded file, which may
be a partial download, or one for which the checksum doesn't match.
Eventually those
Your message dated Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:32:12 +
with message-id e1s7va0-0003jh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#618920: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.39
has caused the Debian Bug report #618920,
regarding debootstrap: needs more robust download error handling
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:32:12 +
with message-id e1s7va0-0003jh...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#618920: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.39
has caused the Debian Bug report #618920,
regarding debootstrap should retry wget a few times before failing to deal with
transient
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:54:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Jack Carroll wrote:
Supplement the DEBOOTSTRAP ERROR message with something like
Go back, and start the Base System install again, or select a faster
mirror.
This simple hint could greatly reduce frustration for a Debian
debootstrap_1.0.39_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.39.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.39.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.39_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.39_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.39_all.udeb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.39_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.39.dsc
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.39.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.39.tar.gz
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.39.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.39_all.deb
to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:08:26AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
Emdebian doesn't include manpages and some packages (and some udebs
apparently) don't expect this directory to not exist.
I'd be very surprised if any udebs know anything at all about
/usr/share/man.
Colin Watson wrote:
The main trick will be telling the difference between a retrieval
failure and some other kind. base-installer already knows about the
specific names of debootstrap errors, so it doesn't seem out of the
question for it to handle some of them differently. Do you think it
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 16:47, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
* until 03/14 get all translation-only changed udebs uploaded
* until 03/14 get pending fixes commited uploaded
* on 03/17 try to get the packages migrated to testing
Are there any non-installer-specific
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 17:58:38 +
Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 01:08:26AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
Emdebian doesn't include manpages and some packages (and some udebs
apparently) don't expect this directory to not exist.
I'd be
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/vmgtpwgqglnv.rcywc...@smtp.gmail.com
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if
needed later as well.
It's fixed already.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
I've committed my improved version, which you're welcome to review:
Cool! Thanks for looking into this. This problem has reared its head
on me too many times to count over the past few years ;)
Thanks again!
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 20:20, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 15:33:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Dunno if we can consider it a blocker for a1 and we can do binNMU if
needed later as well.
It's fixed already.
I'll do translation mass-upload tomorrow
18 matches
Mail list logo
