Take a look at http://jimmy.kaplowitz.org/jimmy/debian.org/ports/netbsd/
and see if you like what you see. I have not committed it yet, because
it's still too soon to assume that everyone wants me to do so, but you
can all now see what it would look like, and give me feedback. I copied
Matthew Garr
It certainly looks very in-line with the rest of debian.org, very nice.
Could we maybe have a central Debian BSD page, which explains the idea
behind it, plus pages with the work/status of the various specific ports
- {Net,Open,Free}BSD.
Pavel.
* Pavel Cholakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-30T12:13+0200]:
> It certainly looks very in-line with the rest of debian.org, very nice.
> Could we maybe have a central Debian BSD page, which explains the idea
> behind it, plus pages with the work/status of the various specific ports
> - {Net,Open,F
El dc, 30 gen 2002 07:44:19 Jimmy Kaplowitz ha escrit:
Take a look at http://jimmy.kaplowitz.org/jimmy/debian.org/ports/netbsd/
and see if you like what you see.
very nice!
mmh.. the link to debian.org in the Resources section isn't much senseful
here.
btw, I vote for Debian GNU/*BSD too.
--
Yup, looks good. I don't quite see why you don't want to move the tarball over,
though... Speaking of which, how about an updated snapshot? I've got a long
weekend ahead of me (no school on Friday, yippee!) so I might finally get
around to installing me one. :-)
One thing that might be nice to hav
Hi,
chroot /debian /bin/bash is SEGVing on me; attached is the output of
ktrace -i chroot /debian /bin/bash; kdump.
Matthew
318 ktrace EMUL "netbsd"
318 ktrace RET ktrace 0
318 ktrace CALL execve(0xbfbfd7bc,0xbfbfdc4c,0xbfbfdc5c)
318 ktrace NAMI "/sbin/chroot"
318 ktra
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>--8EbpmHtzgx
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Description: message body text
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>Hi,
>
>chroot /debian /bin/bash is SEGVing on me; attached is the output of
>ktrace -i chroot /debian /bin/bash; kdump.
>
Two or three times now, I've run into bugs that were wishlisted or outright
closed because we are not considered an Official Architecture (tm) yet; the
determining factor in this appears to be "are you listed in dpkg's arch
list?"
Therefore, I think it's about time we were. I'm willing to talk to
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I wrote:
> I think I've tracked this bug down to a problem in the nfs server
>configuration...
>
Indeed. The Debian nfsd has `root_squash' set as default, meaning
that root can't read the ld_so.conf file (-rw---) because it gets
mapped to uid nobody.
So, a bi
안녕하세요!
DM/TM, 창업홍보, 영업에 있어서 꼭 필요한 [전국판 CD번호부 2002]를 소개해 드립니다.
이제 전국의 기업체 및 지역별 고객(인명)을 여러분의 고객으로 만들어 보세요.
1. CD번호부2002 제품 종류(2가지)안내
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:01:22AM -0800, Michael Goetze wrote:
> Yup, looks good. I don't quite see why you don't want to move the tarball
> over,
> though... Speaking of which, how about an updated snapshot? I've got a long
Well, I didn't really want to take control of that away from Matthew
Ga
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:55:44AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Two or three times now, I've run into bugs that were wishlisted or outright
> closed because we are not considered an Official Architecture (tm) yet; the
> determining factor in this appears to be "are you listed in dpkg's arch
> list?"
* Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-30T10:55-0700]:
> Two or three times now, I've run into bugs that were wishlisted or outright
> closed because we are not considered an Official Architecture (tm) yet; the
> determining factor in this appears to be "are you listed in dpkg's arch
> list?"
W
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 04:06:03PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> That's a good suggestion, and after I finish getting the site moved
> over, we can do that. Also, I'd suggest that some of you go to
> http://cvs.debian.org/?cvsroot=webwml for instructions on checking out
> the website anonymously,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:21:21PM +0100, Michael Weber wrote:
> * Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-30T10:55-0700]:
> > Two or three times now, I've run into bugs that were wishlisted or outright
> > closed because we are not considered an Official Architecture (tm) yet; the
> > determining
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:21:21PM +0100, Michael Weber wrote:
> * Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-01-30T10:55-0700]:
> > Two or three times now, I've run into bugs that were wishlisted or outright
> > closed because we are not considered an Official Architecture (tm) yet; the
> > determining
Hi,
Further to my previous mail, if I make the red.1.gz->ed.1.gz link in
the chroot's /import/ed-0.2/debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man1/ from linux
or bsd, then the linux machine with the chroot nfs-mounted can
recognise the link, but BSD doesn't (neither the chroot'd bsd, or the
native netbsd box). A
Ooops. here's the promised typescript
Script started on Thu Jan 31 01:42:10 2002
bash-2.05# cd /debian
bash-2.05# ls
apt-get.core dev home lost+found sbin
bin etc import mnt tmp
boot floppy initrd proc usr
cdrom
Hi folks,
I'm using an nfs-mount as my chroot, and am getting strange ln
behaviour, which is causing builds to fail.
In this case, it's ed I'm trying to build, and things are failing
because the symlink of red.1.gz->ed.1.gz is producing rubbish - you'll
see in the typescript that trying to read f
19 matches
Mail list logo
