On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 18:55, Mats Erik Andersson
wrote:
> to plan some sort of work schedule. As was mentioned earlier the
> prospects of upstream FreeBSD accepting an entry in linprocfs
> are bright.
That would be the best option for me, since any linux-centric utility
would then work out of t
Petr Salinger writes:
>>> There is no way, signal is determined by eglibc compiled for.
>>> Lets assume that your binary is compiled under squeeze.
>>> Under squeeze eglibc, it will receive SIGBUS,
>>> under sid eglibc it will receive SIGSEGV.
>>
>> I don't understand this part. Your first sentenc
signal is determined by the build environment, but the next part seems
to contradict that. Is this just a wording problem (the first sentence
missing a not?) or something more subtle?
Build environment of used eglibc (MIN_KERNEL_SUPPORTED),
but not build environment of your binary.
Plain FreeB
3 matches
Mail list logo