Hello,
I am trying to port Openblas / Gotoblas to Kfreebsd.
It is building fine with asdfasdf & io (chroot unstable) but it fails
with the build services:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openblas&suite=experimental
Any hints ?
Thanks
Sylvestre
PS: Please C/C me.
--
To UNSUBSCR
Hello,
I am trying to port Openblas / Gotoblas to Kfreebsd.
It is building fine with asdfasdf & io (chroot unstable) but it fails
with the build services:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openblas&suite=experimental
Any hints ?
Some time-skew ?
I guess that "getarch_2nd.c" shoul
Hello,
Thanks for the quick answer.
Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Petr Salinger a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> > I am trying to port Openblas / Gotoblas to Kfreebsd.
> > It is building fine with asdfasdf & io (chroot unstable) but it fails
> > with the build services:
> > https://buildd.debian.org
Sylvestre Ledru (31/05/2011):
> Pardon my ignorance but what is time-skew ?
That's described a bit in that documentation:
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Sylvestre Ledru (31/05/2011):
> OK thanks. However, openblas is not using autotools here...
The concept of having files unpacked in this or that order, leading to
problems when considering whether a target is up-to-date[*], isn't
specific to autotools.
[*] Be it because of buggy dependencies in
Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 14:46 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Sylvestre Ledru (31/05/2011):
> > Pardon my ignorance but what is time-skew ?
>
> That's described a bit in that documentation:
> /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz
OK thanks. However, openblas is not using autotools her
Anyway, the difference between buildd and porter machine is also CPU.
On one my machine (and seems also on both GNU/kFreeBSD builld)
"make getarch_2nd" fails.
The "param.h" handles OPTERON, but not INTEL_UNKNOWN
as generated by "getarch 1":
my machine:
#define INTEL_UNKNOWN
#define L1_CODE_SIZE
None of the blockers for this bug exist anymore. Is there any objection to the
proposed patch? Please have a look:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=debian-installer.diff;att=1;bug=596596
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.
Hello,
Robert Millan, le Tue 31 May 2011 15:47:38 +0200, a écrit :
> None of the blockers for this bug exist anymore. Is there any objection to
> the
> proposed patch? Please have a look:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=debian-installer.diff;att=1;bug=596596
Mm
2011/5/31 Samuel Thibault :
> Mmm, I have already added a pkg-lists/netboot/gtk/kfreebsd-amd64.cfg
> with an equivalent of what works for hurd-i386 (evdev and fbdev are not
> part of gtk-common any more, for instance).
It works fine with the file you added, it seems that console-setup has been
por
10 matches
Mail list logo