Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, I am trying to port Openblas / Gotoblas to Kfreebsd. It is building fine with asdfasdf & io (chroot unstable) but it fails with the build services: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openblas&suite=experimental Any hints ? Thanks Sylvestre PS: Please C/C me. -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Petr Salinger
Hello, I am trying to port Openblas / Gotoblas to Kfreebsd. It is building fine with asdfasdf & io (chroot unstable) but it fails with the build services: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openblas&suite=experimental Any hints ? Some time-skew ? I guess that "getarch_2nd.c" shoul

Re: Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello, Thanks for the quick answer. Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Petr Salinger a écrit : > Hello, > > > I am trying to port Openblas / Gotoblas to Kfreebsd. > > It is building fine with asdfasdf & io (chroot unstable) but it fails > > with the build services: > > https://buildd.debian.org

Re: Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Sylvestre Ledru (31/05/2011): > Pardon my ignorance but what is time-skew ? That's described a bit in that documentation: /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Sylvestre Ledru (31/05/2011): > OK thanks. However, openblas is not using autotools here... The concept of having files unpacked in this or that order, leading to problems when considering whether a target is up-to-date[*], isn't specific to autotools. [*] Be it because of buggy dependencies in

Re: Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mardi 31 mai 2011 à 14:46 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : > Sylvestre Ledru (31/05/2011): > > Pardon my ignorance but what is time-skew ? > > That's described a bit in that documentation: > /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz OK thanks. However, openblas is not using autotools her

Re: Different behavior in the chroot and build services

2011-05-31 Thread Petr Salinger
Anyway, the difference between buildd and porter machine is also CPU. On one my machine (and seems also on both GNU/kFreeBSD builld) "make getarch_2nd" fails. The "param.h" handles OPTERON, but not INTEL_UNKNOWN as generated by "getarch 1": my machine: #define INTEL_UNKNOWN #define L1_CODE_SIZE

G-I for GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-05-31 Thread Robert Millan
None of the blockers for this bug exist anymore. Is there any objection to the proposed patch? Please have a look: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=debian-installer.diff;att=1;bug=596596 -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.

Re: Bug#596596: G-I for GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-05-31 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Robert Millan, le Tue 31 May 2011 15:47:38 +0200, a écrit : > None of the blockers for this bug exist anymore. Is there any objection to > the > proposed patch? Please have a look: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=5;filename=debian-installer.diff;att=1;bug=596596 Mm

Re: Bug#596596: G-I for GNU/kFreeBSD

2011-05-31 Thread Robert Millan
2011/5/31 Samuel Thibault : > Mmm, I have already added a pkg-lists/netboot/gtk/kfreebsd-amd64.cfg > with an equivalent of what works for hurd-i386 (evdev and fbdev are not > part of gtk-common any more, for instance). It works fine with the file you added, it seems that console-setup has been por