A graphical installer for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is now available in
D-I daily builds:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/netboot/gtk/
It installs Debian wheezy as is usual with daily builds (but it can be
coerced to install Debian squeeze when in expert mode).
If you can, plea
2011/6/15 Lennart Poettering :
> I have commited this now, though I am pretty sure this is actually
> broken. You cannot just go and make up ifindexes. You need to determine
> the kernel ifindexes for your interfaces. You probably simply need to
> call if_nametoindex() on all ifa_name fields.
In m
Robert Millan (16/06/2011):
> A graphical installer for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is now available in
> D-I daily builds:
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/netboot/gtk/
>
> It installs Debian wheezy as is usual with daily builds (but it can be
> coerced to install Debian sque
A graphical installer for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is now available in
D-I daily builds:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/netboot/gtk/
It installs Debian wheezy as is usual with daily builds (but it can be
coerced to install Debian squeeze when in expert mode).
If you can, ple
Wiadomość napisana przez Darko Hojnik w dniu 2011-06-15, o godz. 20:17:
> I don't think so. They is more then enough to do with the kfreebsd 8. Arno
> told me at the last Linuxday, he is working on iSCSI. The debian-installer
> for KfreeBSD should be radical rewritten. And Jails should be impleme
On Thu, 16.06.11 10:59, Robert Millan (r...@debian.org) wrote:
>
> 2011/6/15 Lennart Poettering :
> > I have commited this now, though I am pretty sure this is actually
> > broken. You cannot just go and make up ifindexes. You need to determine
> > the kernel ifindexes for your interfaces. You pr
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:46:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> A graphical installer for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is now available in
> D-I daily builds:
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/netboot/gtk/
>
> It installs Debian wheezy as is usual with daily builds (but it can b
2011/6/16 Petr Salinger :
> See #596577.
> But we could create new kfreebsd-i386 kernel image just for graphical
> installer.
Is there a way to use mfsroot that isn't constricted by vmem size? How
does Linux handle this?
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.d
Hi!
Am 16.06.2011 11:23, schrieb Alan Braslau:
> I had attempted (unsuccessfully) yesterday to install kfreebsd-amd64
> using the D-I daily build. It failed upon creation of the ufs file
> system. I just tried again with today's image - same problem.
>
> I finally succeeded using the stable mi
2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
> I had attempted (unsuccessfully) yesterday to install kfreebsd-amd64
> using the D-I daily build. It failed upon creation of the ufs file
> system. I just tried again with today's image - same problem.
>
> I finally succeeded using the stable mini.iso
How did it fail?
2011/6/16 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl :
> Tested the mentioned image in vmware. I too encountered a problem when
> creating an ufs file system. From the syslos:
>
> update-dev: warning: unable to find udevadm; skipping
> partman: mkfsuf:
> partman: /dev/da0S1: could not find especial device
Is thi
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
kfreebsd-7 hasn't been included with squeeze and is now obsoleted by kfreebsd-8
(and kfreebsd-9, which was just uploaded to experimental and should be in NEW
by now).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
Hi!
Am 16.06.2011 12:28, schrieb Robert Millan:
>> Tested the mentioned image in vmware. I too encountered a problem when
>> creating an ufs file system. From the syslos:
>>
>> update-dev: warning: unable to find udevadm; skipping
>> partman: mkfsuf:
>> partman: /dev/da0S1: could not find espec
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.dsc
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109.orig.tar.gz
kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.debian.tar.gz
kfreebsd-source-9.0_9.0~svn223109-0.1_all.deb
kfreebsd-headers-9.0
2011/6/15 Petr Salinger :
>> Is there any point in keeping kfreebsd-6 and kfreebsd-7 directories
>> in SVN? I think they could be removed.
>
> They are still in oldstable, it does not cost much to have them in SVN.
Yes, but they receive commits that are not intended (or even remotely
suitable) fo
Package: libc0.1
Version: 2.13-7
Severity: normal
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
$ fakeroot id -u
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded:
ignored.
1000
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT pol
(new) kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.debian.tar.gz optional kernel
(new) kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109-0.1.dsc optional kernel
(new) kfreebsd-9_9.0~svn223109.orig.tar.gz optional kernel
(new) kfreebsd-headers-9-amd64_9.0~svn223109-0.1_kfreebsd-amd64.deb optional
kernel
header files for kernel of FreeBSD
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
> > I had attempted (unsuccessfully) yesterday to install kfreebsd-amd64
> > using the D-I daily build. It failed upon creation of the ufs file
> > system. I just tried again with today's image - same problem
2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
> Of course, I was led to this reinstallation as a recent update
> of grub resulted in an unbootable system... and I decided that
> it would be easier to reinstall rather than to fix the bootloader
> configuration.
We really need a fix for this. Is there no faster way tha
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-13.1
Severity: normal
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
When booting a kfreebsd-amd64/squeeze system, initscripts attempt to
read /proc/stat very early, before /proc has been mounted:
INIT: version 2.88 booting
Using makefile-style concurre
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-13.1
Severity: normal
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
This error message is seen during boot:
mkdir: cannot create directory `/dev/shm': Operation not supported
Mount point '/dev/shm' does not exist. Skipping mount. ... (warning).
--
It seems basically usable but already found some serious problems.
1) fakeroot is broken (#630695)
$ fakeroot id -u
ERROR: ld.so: object 'libfakeroot-sysv.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
1000
2) grub scripts fail, at least for ATA drives, because of device name change
(/dev/ad0
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.88dsf-13.10
Severity: normal
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
After upgrading from squeeze version of initscripts, a number of new errors
appear during boot:
Mounting kernel filesystems...done.
[...]
mount option is unknown
mount: tmpfs
Le 16/06/2011 14:37, Robert Millan a écrit :
> 2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
>> Of course, I was led to this reinstallation as a recent update
>> of grub resulted in an unbootable system... and I decided that
>> it would be easier to reinstall rather than to fix the bootloader
>> configuration.
>
> We
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:32:00PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Le 16/06/2011 14:37, Robert Millan a écrit :
> > 2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
> >> Of course, I was led to this reinstallation as a recent update
> >> of grub resulted in an unbootable system... and I decided that
> >> it would be easier
Hi,
libreoffice 3.3.3-1 fails to build on kfreebsd-* with the following
(see
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1%3A3.3.3-1&stamp=1308240320
and
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1%3A3.3.3-1&stamp=13
Alan Braslau writes:
> Finding oneself with an unbootable system after a grub update
> and not seeing this fixed rapidly is a pretty strong motivation
> for one to drop the kfreebsd project all together.
Well grub fixed itself already as there was a new grub upload yesterday
evening. (And it did
found 630197 1.99-7
notfound 630197 1.99-6
retitle 630197 grub 1.99-7 is linked with libgeom0 8.2, but testing
has libgeom0 8.1
thanks
1.99-7 has just been uploaded and was linked with libgeom 8.2 [1][2].
This is much better than being linked with 8.1 in a suite
where it can only be used with 8.2
[ -bsd can be dropped I guess, but CC'ing now again to clean
thi sup, ad it's not BSD-specific ]
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:15:19PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> libreoffice 3.3.3-1 fails to build on kfreebsd-* with the following
> (see
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libre
2011/6/16 Christoph Egger :
> Alan Braslau writes:
>> Finding oneself with an unbootable system after a grub update
>> and not seeing this fixed rapidly is a pretty strong motivation
>> for one to drop the kfreebsd project all together.
>
> Well grub fixed itself already as there was a new grub up
Hi!
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 11:53:51 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/6/12 Jonathan Nieder :
> > A better fix is to wait for Guillem's upload and then schedule a
> > binnmu. Sorry for the noise.
>
> OK
Just in case it has not been noticed, I did this the other day, and
freebsd-libs is sitting i
31 matches
Mail list logo
