Hi folks,
I mentioned this on IRC, but the list is probably a better place for
this.
I just wanted to check if libpam-mount was currently functional on
kfreebsd?
The current git has removed support for bsd/sysv mounting in favour of
libmount (provided by new util-linux), but libmount is not avai
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:06:42PM +0200, Nicolas Barbier wrote:
> 2011/7/22, David Balažic :
>
> > During my last days experience, I never noticed that Debian/kbsd is a
> > Technology Preview.
> > Not while reading the docs, on the download site or during installation.
>
> Debian website → Ports
Package: ufsutils
Version: 8.2-1
Severity: important
ufsutils version 7.1-2 exposed a similar bug which was reported/fixed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526586 and the problem I am
experiencing is very closely related (if not exactly the same).
Let's create a blockdevice to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 635173 + d-i
Bug #635173 [ufsutils] ufsutils: mkfs.ufs and libufs not functional under
standard Linux: "could not find special device"
Added tag(s) d-i.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
635173
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 19:34:06 +0200
with message-id <20110723173406.ga28...@volta.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: please set priority to required
has caused the Debian Bug report #324924,
regarding please set priority to required
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Package: ufsutils
Version: 8.2-1
Severity: important
First, take into account that the following bugfix needs to be in place in
order to continue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635173
Next, let's create a 2 gigabyte size ramdisk as follows:
lapedb:~# rmmod brd ; modprobe brd
ufsutils_8.2-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ufsutils_8.2-2.dsc
ufsutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
ufsutils_8.2-2_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@li
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:49:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#632564: fixed in ufsutils 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #632564,
regarding ufsutils: FTBFS with ld --as-needed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 17:49:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#634158: fixed in ufsutils 8.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #634158,
regarding unable to create mkfs on a zvol
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Accepted:
ufsutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
to main/u/ufsutils/ufsutils_8.2-2.debian.tar.gz
ufsutils_8.2-2.dsc
to main/u/ufsutils/ufsutils_8.2-2.dsc
ufsutils_8.2-2_amd64.deb
to main/u/ufsutils/ufsutils_8.2-2_amd64.deb
Override entries for your package:
ufsutils_8.2-2.dsc - source utils
ufsuti
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:24:25 +0200
with message-id <20110723192425.gh13...@hall.aurel32.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#635173: ufsutils: mkfs.ufs and libufs not functional
under standard Linux: "could not find special device"
has caused the Debian Bug report #635173,
regarding ufsut
2011/7/22 Nicolas Barbier :
> So, possibly the status should be put on the main port page:
>
> http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/>
>
> …and maybe somewhere early in the installation manual (for people that
> never visit the port page), for example at:
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/stabl
First, take into account that the following bugfix needs to be in place in
order to continue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635173
Please, how you did build of ufsutils after that ?
The very important part of debian/rules of usfutils package is
***
# GNU/kFreeBSD
On 07/23/11 22:31, Petr Salinger wrote:
First, take into account that the following bugfix needs to be in
place in
order to continue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635173
Please, how you did build of ufsutils after that ?
The very important part of debian/rules of usfutils p
On 07/23/11 22:31, Petr Salinger wrote:
First, take into account that the following bugfix needs to be in
place in
order to continue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635173
Please, how you did build of ufsutils after that ?
The very important part of debian/rules of usfutils p
Your message dated Sat, 23 Jul 2011 23:11:12 +0200
with message-id <2011072322.gq29...@sym.noone.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#635198: ufsutils: mkfs.ufs fails on blockdevice larger
than 2 gigabyte
has caused the Debian Bug report #635198,
regarding ufsutils: mkfs.ufs fails on blockdevice larg
Package: libc0.1-dev
Version: 2.13-10
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
FreeBSD gained an implementation for O_CLOEXEC in r21 (Add
O_CLOEXEC flag to open(2) and fhopen(2), 2011-03-25), which made its
way to the freebsd 8 branch in r220241 (MFC r21, 2011-04-01).
Here's a minimal patch (untested) to e
Package: libc0.1-dev
Version: 2.11.2-10+b1
Severity: normal
Man page of issetugid(2) says that unistd.h has `int issetugid(void);',
but Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0.2's unistd.h does not.
I tried to build ruby's trunk, and it failed with a following error.
$ make
CC = ccache gcc
LD = ld
LDSHAR
2011/7/23 Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA :
> Man page of issetugid(2) says that unistd.h has `int issetugid(void);',
> but Debian GNU/kFreeBSD 6.0.2's unistd.h does not.
Note that issetugid syscall stub is already provided, only the
prototype is missing.
I guess the only option is adding to sysdeps, but it
19 matches
Mail list logo
