Accepted:
acpi-modules-9.0-0-486-di_9.0~svn227451-7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
to
main/k/kfreebsd-9/acpi-modules-9.0-0-486-di_9.0~svn227451-7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-9.0-0-486-di_9.0~svn227451-7_kfreebsd-i386.udeb
to
main/k/kfreebsd-9/cdrom-modules-9.0-0-486-di_9.0~svn227451-7_kfreebsd-i3
On 13/12/11 06:59, Robert Millan wrote:
> I guess we should allow it to migrate then?
>
> But I'm still worried about current Wheezy users being forced to
> upgrade to 9.0 and hitting problems like #651624.
Haha, I've quite a headache understanding all the combinations. I'll
list the ones I can
Hi BSD-Porters,
I would like to get rid of bug #621887. Do you have any hint for a
proper fix?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
Andreas Tille (13/12/2011):
> Hi BSD-Porters,
>
> I would like to get rid of bug #621887. Do you have any hint for a
> proper fix?
See your configure.in's *linux*) match. You want to be matching
GNU/kFreeBSD here too (see config.{guess,sub} on kfreebsd-*). There
might be other parts of it where
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:
libnvpair-dev | 8.2-4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libnvpair0 | 8.2-4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libnvpair0-udeb | 8.2-4 | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386
libumem-dev |
Package: cheese
Version: 3.2.2-1+b1
Severity: normal
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
cheese doesn start on kFreeBSD but imediately exits with an
Error: Unexpected lack of content trying to read a line
Unfortunately, I can't see what goes wrong considering this error messag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 650667 -1
Bug#650667: kfreebsd-9: problems with reading of /proc/self/maps
Bug 650667 cloned as bug 651970.
> reassign -1 kfreebsd-image-10.0-0-amd64
Bug #651970 {Done: Robert Millan }
[kfreebsd-image-9.0-0-amd64] kfreebsd-9: problems with
2011/12/13 Steven Chamberlain :
>> But I'm still worried about current Wheezy users being forced to
>> upgrade to 9.0 and hitting problems like #651624.
>
> Haha, I've quite a headache understanding all the combinations.
Relieved to see I'm not alone on that ;-)
> A Squeeze ZFS user would have kf
Your message dated Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:50:43 +0100
with message-id
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #644799,
regarding zpool: /lib/libbsd.so.0: version LIBBSD_0.3 not found (required by
/lib/libgeom.so.1)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 13.12.2011 18:51, Robert Millan wrote:
>> S1. upgrade to kfreebsd-8 8.2, and would need zfsutils 8.2
>
> kfreebsd 8.2 is usable with zfsutils 8.1, they've got a different ZFS
> version but AFAICT they use the same ABI (14 vs 15).
...
>> The
10 matches
Mail list logo
