On 19 December 2011 14:55, Konstantinos Margaritis
mar...@genesi-usa.com wrote:
On 19 December 2011 01:55, Matthias Klose d...@debian.org wrote:
Please have a look at the gcc-4.7 package in experimental, update patches
(hurd,
kfreebsd, ARM is fixed in svn), and investigate the build failures
El 31 de desembre de 2011 4:40, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.de ha escrit:
Yes, but (a) not for their own stuff but to replace the GNU one
which has a bootstrapping issue wrt. libglib nowadays (BSD ports
start from a base OS system and compile everything from source
on each installation), and
On 31/12/11 20:48, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)?
Hi,
I saw it written that way
On fre, 2011-12-30 at 23:29 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
My new patch (attached) fixes only those parts, and I am now able to
build successfully on kfreebsd-i386.
Why did you change printf to fprintf(stdout, ...)?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 11:56:45 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
+#define __FAVOR_BSD 1
#include netinet/in_systm.h
#include netinet/in.h
#include netinet/ip.h
#include netinet/ip_icmp.h
#include netinet/tcp.h
#include netinet/udp.h
+#undef __FAVOR_BSD
Shouldn't this kind of fix
5 matches
Mail list logo
