Processed: Re: Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 661825 normal Bug #661825 [kbdcontrol] On kfreebsd-*, please integrate kbdcontrol within keyboard-configuration. Severity set to 'normal' from 'wishlist' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 6

Bug#661825: do we need to provide keymaps in kbdcontrol?

severity 661825 normal thanks I think that for now I'll assume everything is working fine with the new scheme. In this scenario the old debconf questions and their associated keyboard files are harmless, and still useful for users upgrading from Squeeze. At some point we can remove support for th

Re: Bug#669165: mount errors when attempting remount of /run, /proc and /sys

Hi Roger, 2012/4/29 Roger Leigh : > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:47:34PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: >> Misc errors are displayed during boot because initscripts attempts >> to remount /run, /proc and /sys.  However, on GNU/kFreeBSD it's not >> possible to remount tmpfs, linprocfs or linsysfs file s

Re: Bug#669307: pcp: FTBFS[kfreebsd]: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type

2012/4/20 Robert Millan : > El 20 d’abril de 2012 1:43, Nathan Scott ha escrit: >> That's merged.  For the glibc-bsd commit, will I need an updated >> Build-Depends line to ensure that the new glibc is present when >> building pcp? > > Yes. > >> If so, could you suggest a minimum version to depend

Re: new patch. eglibc upload urgently required!

2012/4/22 Robert Millan : > I notice that my initial patch didn't handle the library dependency > part.  I'm attaching a new patch that fixes this issue. This makes new > packages built against the patched libc0.1-dev depend on libc0.1 >= > 2.13-31. > > VERY IMPORTANT NOTICE: if this patch

Re: svn commit: r234684 - head/lib/libusb

On Saturday 28 April 2012 15:32:58 Robert Millan wrote: > Hi Hans, > > 2012/4/28 Hans Petter Selasky : > >> Can you be more specific about this? We've got around 80 packages > >> that are linking with this library. If it's really broken, we > >> probably need to change the build dependencies and

Bug#669424 closed by Aurelien Jarno (Bug#669424: fixed in eglibc 2.13-31)

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the libc0.1-dev package: #669424: missing struct loadavg It has been closed by Aurelien Jarno . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you h

Bug#654783 closed by Aurelien Jarno (Bug#654783: fixed in eglibc 2.13-31)

This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the libc0.1 package: #654783: race condition in libpthread causes hangs in python2.7 testsuite It has been closed by Aurelien Jarno . Their explanation is attached below along with your original report. If this e

[PATCH libX11] configure: check if issetugid is declared

GNU/kFreeBSD has issetugid in libc (for legacy apps?), but doesn't declare it anywhere, causing gcc to error out with -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. Use AC_CHECK_DECL in addition to AC_CHECK_FUNC so we disable this code instead of failing to build it. Debian bug#669670

Bug#670836: libv8: please enable for kfreebsd-*

Package: src:libv8 Version: 3.8.9.20-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Hi, I found that it is quite easy to build libv8 on GNU/kFreeBSD, with only minor changes to its packaging for Debian: 1. Enable kf

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

tags 667018 patch thanks 2012/4/29 Andrew Shadura : > For sure this is not possible, as it would break compatibility > with FreeBSD. It's much easier to fix scripts so they don't use > non-portable behaviour of net-tools. Yes. I've been meaning to address the problems in avahi for a few days, bu

Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 667018 avahi-daemon Bug #667018 [freebsd-net-tools] please make route behaviour compatible with net-tools Bug reassigned from package 'freebsd-net-tools' to 'avahi-daemon'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #667018 to the s

Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#667018: avahi-daemon: add support for kFreeBSD native tools

reassign 667018 avahi-daemon retitle 667018 please add support for route utility from freebsd-net-tools thanks Hello, On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:52:08 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > I think the reasonable thing here to do, is make route from > freebsd-net-tools behave compatible with route from net-t