Bug#827072: kfreebsd-10: use notify-reboot-required

2016-06-11 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Control: tags -1 + pending Hi, Jon Boden wrote: > notify-reboot-required is the Ubuntu way packages tell the user that a > reboot is required (usually after an upgrade). Patch applied in SVN, thanks! Debian has this too (update-notifier-common) but I'm not sure if it is typically installed.

Processed: Re: Bug#827072: kfreebsd-10: use notify-reboot-required

2016-06-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #827072 [kfreebsd-10] kfreebsd-10: use notify-reboot-required Added tag(s) pending. -- 827072: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827072 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#827072: kfreebsd-10: use notify-reboot-required

2016-06-11 Thread Jon Boden
Package: kfreebsd-10 Version: 10.3~svn300087-1 Tags: patch Hi If it's not too much noise, could you merge this small patch? https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntubsd/ubuntubsd/kfreebsd-10/diff/692?context=3 notify-reboot-required is the Ubuntu way packages tell the user that a reboot is

Bug#827070: kfreebsd-10: please use LDADD instead of LDFLAGS for aicasm

2016-06-11 Thread Jon Boden
Package: kfreebsd-10 Version: 10.3~svn300087-1 Tags: patch Hi When building kfreebsd-10 on ubuntuBSD, at least with current toolchain (and possibly on Debian eventually), it fails with linker errors because the -lbsd -ldb flags are not with the rest of the flags (-ll) and for some reason the

Re: Installer for stable or testing

2016-06-11 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Philipp Martis wrote: > besides the problems I mentioned in my previous two mails from today > and yesterday, the netboot daily images don't allow for installing a > version other than sid. There isn't a kfreebsd "testing" suite at the moment. Only: wheezy, jessie-kfreebsd, and sid. > (I'm

Re: kfreebsd -- encryption options

2016-06-11 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hello, Philipp Martis wrote: > I checked a few other images, namely the daily netboot builds from > 05/12, 05/18, 06/05 and 06/11 (today). They all have the same > problem: "physical volume for encryption" doesn't show up during > partitioning, I should probably write this up in the Wiki...

Installer for stable or testing

2016-06-11 Thread Philipp Martis
Hi, besides the problems I mentioned in my previous two mails from today and yesterday, the netboot daily images don't allow for installing a version other than sid. Hence, I tried the "official build" again, but it still only allows for installing wheezy. Can you estimate when a new version

Re: kfreebsd -- encryption options

2016-06-11 Thread Philipp Martis
Hi, I checked a few other images, namely the daily netboot builds from 05/12, 05/18, 06/05 and 06/11 (today). They all have the same problem: "physical volume for encryption" doesn't show up during partitioning, neither with crypto-modules-10.3.0-amd64-di, nor with

Re: Bug#826906: uid-wrapper: FTBFS[!linux]: only supports libc.so.[0-9] filename

2016-06-11 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 02:20:15 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Package: uid-wrapper > Version: 1.2.0+dfsg1-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > I found this happens because src/uid_wrapper.c doesn't detect the libc's > filename. It