On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:06:42PM +0200, Nicolas Barbier wrote:
> 2011/7/22, David Balažic :
>
> > During my last days experience, I never noticed that Debian/kbsd is a
> > Technology Preview.
> > Not while reading the docs, on the download site or during installation.
>
> Debian website → Ports
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> One test that I think would be useful is either running an upstream
> kernel with Debian's wpa_supplicant, or setting up a FreeBSD chroot
> and running the wpa_supplicant provided by FreeBSD. Then we'd know if
> our problem is in
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 06:32:00PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Le 16/06/2011 14:37, Robert Millan a écrit :
> > 2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
> >> Of course, I was led to this reinstallation as a recent update
> >> of grub resulted in an unbootable system... and I de
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/6/16 Alan Braslau :
> > I had attempted (unsuccessfully) yesterday to install kfreebsd-amd64
> > using the D-I daily build. It failed upon creation of the ufs file
> > system. I just tried again with
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:46:03AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> A graphical installer for Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is now available in
> D-I daily builds:
>
> http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/netboot/gtk/
>
> It installs Debian wheezy as is usual with daily builds (but it can b
On Saturday 04 December 2010 23:57:31 Robert Millan wrote:
> 2010/12/4 Darko Hojnik :
> > But note the Debian Installer for KfreeBSD doesn't install the OS in a
> > Volume.
>
> It does. The volume initially has only one disk, but it can be expanded.
>
> > Thats not practical and in my eyes quick
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 10:54:26 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Alan BRASLAU (28/09/2010):
> > I find your use of the word "complaining" disrespectful. A bug
> > report serves to give feedback, and being polite should be answered
> > politely.
>
> Insisting o
I find your use of the word "complaining" disrespectful.
A bug report serves to give feedback, and being polite
should be answered politely.
The point is that one cannot have things both ways.
Either kfreebsd is indeed to become core as the announcements
advertise (and I imagine the developers wis
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 18:49:52 Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> If some users consider the use of NFS very important, they can probably
> help to solve this issue.
They are, by very patiently (and politely) filing bug reports.
Also by spending time testing.
Not all are programmers, neither having the
http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20091007
``
Debian pushes development of kFreeBSD port
October 7th, 2009
The Debian Release Team is pleased to announce that it sees the port of the
Debian system to the FreeBSD kernel fit to be handled equal with the other
release ports. The upcoming release code
On Tuesday 04 May 2010 15:41:15 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Alan.
>
> Alan BRASLAU (04/05/2010):
> > What is the latest image that is known to work?
>
> That's a good question, see the first mail of this thread, and the
> pointer in there.
>
In fact, the pro
Cyril Brulebois (25/04/2010):
>
> d-i images hadn't been uploaded for quite some weeks after some
> changes on the d-i.d.o machine. Thanks to Andreas Barth, the needed
> magic was performed there, and images have been updated to today's
> builds for both kfreebsd-*.
>
> Feel free to report outda
Hello Debian developers and others,
My intention was/is to be constructive in providing some feedback
on kfreebsd from a user's point of view.
Concerning povray, I had forgotten (or did not realize)
that it is non-free. I am aware that there are some
licensing issues with the beta version, but di
Hello,
Being optimistic and naively believing that kfreebsd is near to being
released for mainstream Debian, I installed kfreebsd-i386 on an older
machine that was in need of a complete re-install from scratch.
My conclusions for the moment is that it is only marginally usable.
Indeed, many packag
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 10:26:44 Petr Salinger wrote:
> >> My mouse is a usb device. lshal shows nothing for it
> >> even though it shows up in dmesg. I have not tried a PS/2 mouse.
> >>
> >> So I am still without a working X11 system...
>
> I borrowed USB mouse from another computer, it works
On Monday 01 February 2010 13:24:05 Petr Salinger wrote:
> >> I had the same issue. I solved it with the follwing lines in my xorg:
> >>
> >> Section "ServerFlags"
> >> Option "AllowEmptyInput" "false"
> >> EndSection
> >>
> >> Section "InputDevice"
> >> Identifier "Default mouse"
> >
On Saturday 30 January 2010 10:39:37 Guillermo Cotone wrote:
> Hello,
> I had the same issue. I solved it with the follwing lines in my xorg:
>
> Section "ServerFlags"
> Option "AllowEmptyInput" "false"
> EndSection
>
> Section "InputDevice"
> Identifier "Default mouse"
> Driver
Hello,
I newly installed kfreebsd-i386, fairly successfully,
using the mini.iso debian installer. However, I have not
been able to get the X11 core pointer (usb mouse) to work:
1. neither "by default" using hal
2. nor using a very minimal xorg.conf
I have seen some discussion in bug reports,
but
18 matches
Mail list logo
