On Monday 15 January 2018 11:10:18 CET Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hardware resources shouldn't be a problem: I'm fairly sure the buildds
> were VMs anyway.
Jep one VM with reasonable IO each and a second VM mostly due to redundancy
requirements
> kFreeBSD could have chosen to use another default
Hi all!
As you undoubtedly have noticed I'm essentially gone from the debian-bsd@
world for more than a year now. And with the stretch release (where we didn't
have a stretch-kfreebsd) the question becomes somewhat important: Who is still
here and working on kfreebsd?
If you are still interest
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Would this be possible again please :/ psmisc is still not fixed, and
> there are still surprisingly many gcc-6 uploads.
And gcc-5. Done
> (Maybe even a daily cron for this would be a good idea...)
that cron would need to run as buildd user at the very least and
re
angelog 2017-02-05 14:01:01.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+light-locker (1.7.0-3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * kfreebsd port
+
+ -- Christoph Egger Sun, 05 Feb 2017 14:01:01 +0100
+
light-locker (1.7.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Jackson Doak ]
--- light-locker-1.7.0/debian/rules 2015-07
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> > Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
>> > stuck again with hung gdb processes?
>>
>> It is, will kill it in a minute just need to
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Please could someone check the gcc-7 build on fayrfax, to see of it is
> stuck again with hung gdb processes?
It is, will kill it in a minute just need to remember my sudo password
> Also, I can't see that buildd fano has built much recently either.
Building gc
Hi!
I've just killed the gcc builds on kfreebsd. THey're all looping with a
| WARNING: 30 signals -- adjust and recompile.
Regards
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: src:vim
Version: 2:8.0.0022-1
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi!
vim FTBFS on kfreebsd-* due to testsuite failures (see below) which
also breaks bootstrap of porterbox chroots.
Christoph
6 FAILED:
Found errors in Test_command_count_2():
Caugh
Hi!
Christoph Egger writes:
> Would you mind making the testsuite non-fatal until this race is
> fixed? I can prepare a NMU as well if you want me to. The failure's
> currently blocking also libreoffice to build on !linux
FWIW I'd apply the below patch from James Clarke an
Hi!
Would you mind making the testsuite non-fatal until this race is
fixed? I can prepare a NMU as well if you want me to. The failure's
currently blocking also libreoffice to build on !linux
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker |
Hi!
Jon Boden writes:
> What are your plans for the future of init on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? Are you
> going to continue with sysvinit for the time being?
>
> For the upcoming release of ubuntuBSD I'm thinking about using BusyBox
> + OpenRC
> (https://blog.flameeyes.eu/2012/03/using-busybox-with-o
Hi!
Seems F_GETPATH is missing on kFreeBSD. This is actually funny as this
seems to be a feature originally from BSD and added to linux only later
on. Result is the buildfailure of hubicfuse.
Christoph
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=hubicfuse&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.0.0-1.1
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Do you have some way to re-trigger this on kfreebsd-i386? Or will it
> happen automatically?
>
> And then once this is built, please trigger the samba security update to
> build again on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386.
On it.
> It *should* build
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
>> try the attached patch please?
>
> Here's how to run that test on its own, verbosely, in an already-built
> Debian build tree:
>
> $ Build/bin/cmake "-DCMAKE_MODULE_
Hi
FWIW on the 3.2 build (with the patch) I started untill I noticed it
wasn't quite the right version
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> 292 - RunCMake.Configure (Failed)
>
> Could someone with access to the hurd-i386 or kfreebsd porter boxes
> try the attached patch p
Package: src:git
Severity: important
Version: 1:2.8.0~rc3-1
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertag: kfreebsd
Hi!
git fails the testsuite on kfreebsd currently. This seems to be
reproducible with sid chroots on my stable/ufs system but not on my
noteboo
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> (I think this is causing the failure to install build-deps of
>> kfreebsd-10 in experimental, and it might affect other packages).
>
> Although on kfreebsd-amd64, where glibc is up-to-date in the buildd
> chroots, there is still something o
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> This happens on Sunday and Wednesday evenings (21:13):
>
> 13 21 * * 0,3 root
> PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin
> setup-all-dchroots buildd
>
> but the binNMUs for glibc/2.22 on kfreebsd-i386 didn't finish until just
> after
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> If you ever have time, please could you upload this for me (to
> experimental) since the new "10.3" binary packages must go through the
> NEW queue. It is staged as revision 5929 at:
> svn://anonscm.debian.org/glibc-bsd/trunk/kfreebsd-10
>
> I haven't actually tr
Hi!
I'm seeing this on my notebook since upgrading dpkg-dev to unstable's
version:
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 15442 bytes: control archive=1046 bytes.
tar: .: Cannot change mode to rwxr-sr-x: Operation not permitted
tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
dpkg-deb: er
Hi!
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Steven Chamberlain (2016-03-02):
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
>> Please could you check why krb5 has stayed 'Uploaded' for 7d+
>> and now 'Installed' yet?
>>
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=krb5
>
> It's in now.
Jep I tried to reupload everything I got m
Hi!
Some reports from IRC
helmut | hi, I noticed that: debhelper runtime depends on groff, groff
build-depends on libxt, libxt build-depends on glib2.0, glib2.0 bulild-depends
on elfutils, elfutils
| ftbfs on kfreebsd-any
helmut | the last cause for this change is glib2.0 moving from lib
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> graphite2 packages are there already.
>
> Actually, only the wheezy ones. The jessie-kfreebsd ones haven't
> appeared yet. I think it may just take a few more hours for something
> to happen.
Turns out a jessie-kfreebse/updates uplo
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> It has been a few hours since DSA 3481-1, but I've not seen any buildd
> mails about glibc_2.19-18+deb8u3 being built yet on jessie-kfreebsd.
> Are you able to see if it was triggered at all, and if it is building
> currently?
Seems maybe the trigger to buildd.de
Hi!
Maybe this patch could also be applied to stable (as all buildds have
been updated to freebsd-10 and it'd be great to be able to build
proposed-updates and security without additional work ;-)
FWIW I'll take care of the current version in -p-u for
jessie-kfreebsd-p-u so no need to hurry
Than
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> Any idea what's wrong with the perl testsuite in
>> jessie-kfreebsd-security?
>
> It's the same thing we saw in sid recently until they added a workaround
> (https://bugs.debian.org/796798).
Oh great we know the actual problem? :-)
> It began after the kernel w
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> kfreebsd-kernel-headers/10.1~8 should have fixed vm/vm.h, but it
> has not been installed on the buildds yet. It must be done manually,
> and it may be a few days before Christoph can do that.
FWIW this happens automatically these days
13 21 * * 0,3 root
PATH=/sbin
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> I've checked through old build logs and found some issues that
> affected multiple packages.
Should all be on the way!
Thanks
Christoph
--
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Please could you give back mesa on kfreebsd-*. It had failed with
>
> | ../../../../src/egl/drivers/dri2/platform_drm.c:641:42: error:
> | 'F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> whereas libc0.1-dev >> 2.21~ now provides this.
Done and buil
Hi ftp-masters!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> > Is it possible Ansgar could copy gdk-pixbuf/2.31.1-2+deb8u3 into
>> > jessie-kfreebsd-proposed-updates?
Could you please copy jessie-kfreebsd/updates into
jessi
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Some packages had build attempts, and went into Failed state rather than
>> BD-Uninstallabe; and were retried hundreds of times, e.g.
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=freecad&suite=sid
>
> The problem seems to have cl
Christoph Egger writes:
> Currently the whole KDE5 transition thing is stuck in unstable
> unbuildable. Reason is the dependency chain kde -> phonon4qt4 -> vlc-nox
> where the vlc BinNMU for newer libx265 hasn't been built because samba
> FTBFS (removes non-created m
Hi!
Currently the whole KDE5 transition thing is stuck in unstable
unbuildable. Reason is the dependency chain kde -> phonon4qt4 -> vlc-nox
where the vlc BinNMU for newer libx265 hasn't been built because samba
FTBFS (removes non-created manpage during the build process).
Christoph
--
9FED 5C
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Is it possible Ansgar could copy gdk-pixbuf/2.31.1-2+deb8u3 into
> jessie-kfreebsd-proposed-updates?
The step from security to -p-u should be automatic. How old is the
security build?
Christoph
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Afair I can loginto the buildd, rename the changes file there and
>> upload.
>
> It still hasn't installed. Shall I just upload a new version?
Seems I need to refresh the signature as well as rename the
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Pretty smart! That's exactly what I did. I often build with
> `dpkg-buildpackage -g` but somehow never saw this problem before,
> in sid for example. Maybe it is only an issue in -proposed-updates.
>
> Is it something easily fixed without doing a binNMU or uploading
Forgot to add the comandline:
./vmdebootstrap --grub --sparse --image jessie-kfreebsd-vm.raw --roottype ufs
--distribution jessie-kfreebsd --no-acpi
--kernel-package=kfreebsd-image-10-amd64 --mirror http://ftp.fau.de/debian/
--serial-console
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E7
rong I can have a VBox /
VMWare image soon.
The vmdebootstrap patches have been sent to the upstream mailnglist,
we'll see what happens
Christoph
Christoph Egger writes:
> [0] https://git.siccegge.de/?p=forks/vmdebootstrap.git;a=summary
[1] https://people.debian.org/~christo
Hi!
Christoph Egger writes:
> As discussed, I'm trying to create a patchset for vmdebootsstrap[0] so
> it works on kfreebsd. Currently things are mostly going well but I'm
> struggling to find a proper replacement for the linux blkid/UUID
> mechanism for the rootfs. /dev/u
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Does sysctl kern.geom.confxml maybe give this info? Perhaps the ufsid
> is listed as a child node of the geom device providing it.
Thanks! This does indeed contain the right information
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian
Hi all!
As discussed, I'm trying to create a patchset for vmdebootsstrap[0] so
it works on kfreebsd. Currently things are mostly going well but I'm
struggling to find a proper replacement for the linux blkid/UUID
mechanism for the rootfs. /dev/ufsid/* does seem to be the right place
but I can't fi
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Christoph Egger writes:
>> > -> http://poll.faui2k9.de/kFreeBSD-2015-10/
>>
>> This Friday, 18:00 UTC? Later works for me as well.
>
> Friday sounds good, could we make it 19:00 UTC please?
Sure.
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> It would be nice to get a written record, if we can try to get
> http://meetbot.debian.net/Manual.html working ideally.
We now have the MeetBot thanks to Richard Darst
Christoph
Christoph Egger writes:
> -> http://poll.faui2k9.de/kFreeBSD-2015-10/
This Friday, 18:00 UTC? Later works for me as well.
Christoph
Hi all!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Thursdays in general won't work and during the weekend will be tricky (I
>> *can* make it Sunday late evening or Saturday untill late afternoon if
>> really necessary). Apart from
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Would you be free in the next few days for an IRC meeting, so we can
> figure out remaining issues to be able to release jessie-kfreebsd?
Thursdays in general won't work and during the weekend will be tricky (I
*can* make it Sunday late evening or Saturday untill
Hi!
FWIW I can fully confirm this makes 802.11n WIFI with intel cards work
decently compared to 10.1. 10.2 also reduces power consumption on my
notebook by something like 30% in idle.
I'd stack update to 10.2 in experimental as I find time and put it to
unstable once everythings there a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Egger
* Package name: bhyve
Version : 10.2
Upstream Author : FreeBSD Foundation
* URL : http://bhyve.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C / ASM
Description : hypervisor/virtual machine manager for
Hi!
I was talking to Helmut during debconf and the idea came up to keep (a
few) easy porting bugs around for newcommers. These tends to be FTBFS
bugs but as we're no longer blocking migration it doesn't really hurt to
keep some of them around and just tag them newcommer.
Christoph
signature.a
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
Would it be possible to have jessie-kfreebsd on tracker.debian.org? I
was trying to add a patch but I don't totally understand the fields in
[0] yet.
Thanks
Christoph
[0] distro_tracker/core/fixtures/debian-repositories.xml
-- System Inform
Hi all!
Some note, from DSA:
oh btw: when mounting stuff fails at boot, you get a shell with /
mounted ro. then you try to remount it rw (so you can fix fstab),
but that fails silently if you don't fsck first. it'd be nice to
have some kind of message from mount or the kernel when it do
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 03:45:05PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I'll need to upload a busybox (udeb) fix to jessie-proposed-updates.
> Would you be able to enable me to do that please?
Should be on it's way .. if the network here decides to work
Christoph
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> # debootstrap jessie-kfreebsd jessie http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/
>> E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/jessie-kfreebsd
>
> That should be fixed already in debootstrap/1.0.67+kbsd8u1, in
>
Hi!
Just noticed and should probably look at it later:
# debootstrap jessie-kfreebsd jessie http://debian.netcologne.de/debian/
E: No such script: /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/jessie-kfreebsd
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> There some packages in the queue, not actually building them yet:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=kfreebsd-amd64&suite=jessie-kfreebsd
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=kfreebsd-i386&suite=je
Ahoi!
Christoph Egger writes:
> The idea was to directly upload to jessie-kfreebsd (which is, unlike
> jessie, unstantly visible). This also means the `normal` DM rules apply
> (which they don't for secuity-master).
>
> Needs properly setup autobuilding for jessie-kf
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> There is no jessie-kfreebsd security building at all currently. Was
>> waiting on aba who knows that code but am trying to hack there myself
>> nowadays.
jessie-kfreebsd-security just started building thanks to Ku
Hi!
Jan Henke writes:
> Am 22.06.2015 um 09:07 schrieb Christoph Egger:
>> I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build
>> (might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure)
>
> as far as I recall OpenJDK-7 would work for bootstrappin
Hi!
I've just killed openjdk-8 builds for now. It needs itself to build
(might just need bootstrapping using openjdk-7 -- not sure)
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ.
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> __FreeBSD_kernel_version
I guess I knew once about this one, thanks!
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fv5u8
Hi folks!
Michael Biebl writes:
> open.c: In function 'glibtop_open_s':
> open.c:46:28: error: '__FreeBSD_version' undeclared (first use in this
> function)
> server->os_version_code = __FreeBSD_version;
Do we have some concept on how to handle those? In cases where it's a
simple comparison I
Hi!
I have had success with logging in + out again which seems to recover
the machine -- I always seem to be able to get logged in and to a
rootshell and logging out + in again gets rid of the maxproc limit
problem
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Develop
Christoph Egger writes:
> I have had success with logging in + out again which seems to recover
> the machine -- I always seem to be able to get logged in and to a
> rootshell and logging out + in again gets rid of the maxproc limit
> problem
Interestingly we never had that on
Christoph Egger writes:
> I have had success with logging in + out again which seems to recover
> the machine -- I always seem to be able to get logged in and to a
> rootshell and logging out + in again gets rid of the maxproc limit
> problem
Logging in using the libvirt serial conne
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> As it seems `eject` isn't a POSIX-defined utility, shall we just let
> Linux provide its own version in util-linux, and kFreeBSD provide a
> simple camcontrol wrapper within freebsd-utils? (and correspondingly
> in util-linux-udeb and freebsd-utils-udeb too)
Pro
Hi!
Paul Wise writes:
> On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 12:45 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>
>> I'll keep this test system busy with package builds and other tasks, but
>> could use more hints on what might trigger the issue seen with
>> falla.debian.org. (And exactly what issue was seen there, a cras
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Hm I guess not. What me / DSA is mostly interested in would be having
>> e.g. fsck prompts (during bootup) on the serial line in proper. on linux
>> you can do a 'console=ttyS0 console=tty0' and it just works
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Does anyone know whether there's a way to modify the kernel comandline
>> from grub? The active one looks somewhat magic :-/
>>
>> | # cat /proc/cmdline
>> | BOOT_IMAGE=/kernel ro root
Hi!
Jan Henke writes:
> I never tested it with kFreeBSD before, but /etc/default/grub should be
> a starting point. I know it works with Linux to add values to
> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT and/or GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I currently have
> no system at hand to test. I hope that helps.
Which is ignore
Hi!
Does anyone know whether there's a way to modify the kernel comandline
from grub? The active one looks somewhat magic :-/
| # cat /proc/cmdline
| BOOT_IMAGE=/kernel ro root=302
Goal is to get sysvinit's bootlogd use /dev/ttyu0 in the end.
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9
Jan Henke writes:
> Am 30.05.2015 um 18:20 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
>> Christoph Egger wrote:
>>> I have a kfreebsd that boots via virtio. And I'm pretty sute it was
>>> created with virtio disks. I'll check once home again.
>> I already found out th
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> I've set up a clone of the buildds' KVM setup (without Ganeti), and with
> emulated IDE disks this is *crazy* slow.
>
> Do Linux buildd VMs also use if=ide, or is only kfreebsd using that?
Only kfreebsd
> (Would make sense because, I don't think if=scsi is boota
Ahoi!
Christoph Egger writes:
>> Ahoi!
>>
>> Petr Salinger writes:
>>> what is currently used kernel on buildd for kfreebsd-* ?
>>>
>>> According to last log of util-linux (22 May 2015/fayrfax.debian.org):
>>> Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 9.0-2-am
debian-adm...@lists.debian.org is the right mailadress for that side
Christoph Egger writes:
> Ahoi!
>
> Petr Salinger writes:
>> what is currently used kernel on buildd for kfreebsd-* ?
>>
>> According to last log of util-linux (22 May 2015/fayrfax.debian.org):
&g
Ahoi!
Petr Salinger writes:
> what is currently used kernel on buildd for kfreebsd-* ?
>
> According to last log of util-linux (22 May 2015/fayrfax.debian.org):
> Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 9.0-2-amd64 kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)
You are indeed right. All buildds are still running wheezy. Peter from
DSA u
Hi Andreas!
Are you still planing to look at how to integrate kfreebsd into buildd
infrastructure? I remember you reason about wether to create separate
suites or use the "normal" jessie ones on the buildd side -- did you
find any conclusions?
I started digging around on wuiet and [0] is the
Hi Steven, list!
I understand the thing below is the intended fix for util-linux? Is
there some planned timeline to get it into unstable? We're not building
anything currently for as long as util-linux isn't updated so one might
want to push a little
Thanks
Christoph
stevenc-gu...@alioth.debi
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> This is unrelated to any change in openjdk-7, but a regression (#777122)
> in patch 2.7.4-2, fixed in 2.7.5-1.
>
> Please could you update build-essential on kfreebsd buildds?
> And then give back openjdk-7 for rebuilds.
On the way!
Christoph
signature.asc
D
Hi all!
Moritz Muehlenhoff writes:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 05:36:38PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
>> Hmm, does the security team plan to support kfreebsd?
>
> Not specifically, the plan is basically to trigger the builds for
> kfreebsd-* with the release of the DSA (hence plugging it into d
Hi!
So the planned setup would consist of 3 -kfreebsd pockets for jessie:
on ftp-master:
- jessie-kfreebsd
- jessie-proposed-updates-kfreebsd
on security-master:
- updates/jessie-kfreebsd
where jessie-proposed-updates-kfreebsd is where our own uploads go. We
can put kfreebsd-only packages
Hi!
Ansgar and me have been discussing the archive setup for
jessie-kfreebsd yesterday. Basically there's going to be a
jessie-kfreebsd and jessie-p-u-kfreebsd thing on ftp-master where the
jessie-p-u-kfreebsd automatically pulls in new uploads from jessie-p-u
via some dak script (allowing speci
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes:
> For kfreebsd-8 we've skipped previous updates, since it was
> said -8 were mostly a test kernel. So I don't think it
> makes sense to start with it now? Or did I miss something?
You're right. -9 should be on the way.
Christoph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signa
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.9) wheezy-security; urgency=medium
+
+ * Upstream patch for FreeBSD-SA-15:04.igmp / CVE-2015-1414 (Closes: #779201)
+
+ -- Christoph Egger Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:08:57 +0100
+
kfreebsd-9 (9.0-10+deb70.8) wheezy-security; urgency=high
* Te
Hi!
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> Christoph Egger writes:
>> I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie
>> release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I
>> think would be best from our point of view and you tell me i
Hi!
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> Ralf Treinen (2014-12-09):
>> Source: kfreebsd-8
>> Version: 8.3-6+deb7u1
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: jessie
>> User: trei...@debian.org
>> Usertags: edos-uninstallable
>>
>> Hi, kfreebsd-8 build-depends on gcc-4.6, which does not exist in jessie.
>
> kfreebsd-9
Hi!
I'll send a email to debian-devel-announce on monday about kFreeBSD
still being alive. I hope we got some of the responses from the teams
untill thn so we have a better idea how kFreeBSD/jessie will look
like. If someone has some points I want to mention please add them to
[0].
Christoph
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> Uploading kfreebsd-10 10.1-RC4 in a minute and I guess see for -final
>
> Final release has been tagged. After the setlogin security fix, there
> was only one more change - but it's kind of odd:
>
> http:
Hi!
We are evaluation options for an unofficial kFreeBSD release alongside
jessie. I'm rather worried about security updates there. My Idea so far
is to keep the security wanna-build trigger active so packages in
security still get built automatically for the unofficial kfreebsd
release also. We c
Hi FTP Masters!
Hi BSD!
I was told you would be supportive of an unofficial kfreebsd jessie
release and willing to add a suite for that. Guess I write here what I
think would be best from our point of view and you tell me if I'm crazy
or not:
+ There would be a jessie-kfreebsd thing next to th
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Christoph Egger wrote:
>> It means we need a stable release of some sort to keep DSA provided
>> hardware. That's currently buildds and porterboxes.
>
> That's annoying.
>
> To provide stable/security support ourselves, it
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
>> DSA can't
>> maintain rolling releases or testing systems for any length of time.
>
> I'm not quite sure what you mean; particularly how those involve DSA.
> What systems would you need to maintain besides the buildds for sid?
It means we need a stable release
Hi all!
First, I do not really know enough about release workflow I guess to
know what -release@ does not want to do for kfreebsd apart from stamping
it as an official release so some of my whishes may be totally
reasonable or way of -- please tell me!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Andreas Barth
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes:
> On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 01:07:34AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> Dear Security Team,
>>
>> Please could we upload to wheezy-security with the attached debdiff to
>> fix issues in kfreebsd-9 (kernel).
>>
>> This disables support for SCTP as previously discussed:
Hi!
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> I don't see any downside to it being in sid: I think the changes are
> careful enough to not get in the way of a future unblock, so isn't
> likely to force some future fix to go through t-p-u instead.
How is the release doing? Which channels do you actually use
Hi!
Riley writes:
> After reading a discussion on the gnu-linux-libre mailing list [1],
> I found that the two files named ar9300_devid.h have a license that
> restricts modification:
Quoting that file:
> #ifndef __AR9300_DEVID_H__
> #define __AR9300_DEVID_H__
>
> /*
> * AR9380 HA
Ahoi!
Christoph Egger writes:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
>> On 31/10/14 12:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>>> kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of
>>> the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts?
>>
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort writes:
> On 31/10/14 12:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of
>> the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts?
>
> That would be bug fixes only, right? I'd be fine with an unblock of
>
Hi Steven, hi release@
Julien Cristau writes:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:43:36 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
>> kfreebsd-10 migrated last night; is there a chance another upload of
>> the kernel could go into sid and be aged in before the freeze starts?
>>
> Leaving aside the first questio
Steven Chamberlain writes:
> Please give back:
> * yade on kfreebsd-amd64
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=yade&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=1.12.0-2&stamp=1414299101
> * matplotlib on kfreebsd-i386
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=matplotlib&arch=kfreebsd-i386&ver=1
Hi!
As Ian reported in the context of #766913, freebsd documentation[0]
suggests using sys/types.h to get uint8_t and friends. However your
advice for sys/param.h seems to be necessary on kFreeBSD. Is that on
purpose?
Christoph
[0]
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=acct&sektion=5&apro
1 - 100 of 828 matches
Mail list logo
