Hi,
Chris Hofstaedtler (2020-05-03):
> * Cyril Brulebois :
> > Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
>
> > > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux
> > > currently linux only.
> > >
> > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how wo
ckage to be
> uninstallable.
Adding debian-bsd@ to the loop for advise.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
porting udhcpc to kFreeBSD proves to be much work, then perhaps
> porting dhclient from OpenBSD might be an option?
Thanks for your feedback, Ondřej.
It'd be helpful to have some input from hurd and kfreebsd people, so
that we know what to do with isc-dhcp-client-udeb in the end…
Cheers,
e was mainly for non-Linux
ports AFAICR.
I'm not sure how BSD is doing these days; maybe hurd is the only user
left?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Michael Biebl (2017-10-26):
> The debconf templates are of course translated. What I meant is that I
> don't ship /usr/share/locale in the eject udeb.
I think I misread gettext as debconf when I received your mail, and I
really should have read it more thoroughly before
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2017-10-24):
> It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the
> gettext translations.
Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the
i18n + l10n part working is important.
> But there is one complication: I
FYI, a quick follow-up:
Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2017-10-26):
> On further investigation, it seems IPv6 addresses changed for both
> machines. I've just modified dillon's configuration accordingly to
> account for the native IPv6 addresses, and next builds should
Hi,
We've been missing d-i daily build uploads for kfreebsd-* since
2017-10-13:
kibi@falla:/home/d-i/di/logs$ grep Permission\ denied.'*'publickey *201710*
di-autobuild_daily-kfreebsd-amd64-20171013-:Permission denied
(publickey).
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2017-03-22):
> On 22/03/17 20:41, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package bind9. It just fixes the a bit
James Clarke (2017-02-11):
> Some data points:
>
> alpha : Missing srm-reader in archive. Builds after adding a
> locally-built .udeb to localudebs (and working around the
> crazy broken mirror setup on electro [one of the local
>
Adding debian-bsd@ and pkg-xfce-devel@ to the loop:
Adam Borowski (2016-07-26):
> Package: task-xfce-desktop
> Version: 3.35
> Severity: important
>
> Hi!
> I'm afraid that the xfce task can't be currently installed on kfreebsd.
> This is especially nasty as xfce is the
Hi,
James Clarke (2017-01-22):
> As you know, debian-installer does not build on non-release
> architectures, since it tries to build for stretch. Some architectures
> also have some of the needed udebs in the unreleased suite, such as
> sparc-utils on sparc64. The attached
Colin Watson (2016-11-26):
> Yep, as Thomas said, this changed back to the original state in
> 2.02~beta3. I think that in fact allows us to close #741656 if you also
> revert your previous workaround in d-i, but please confirm. Compare:
>
>
>
Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2014-03-16):
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org> (2014-03-15):
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:37:17PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > I'm tempted to commit the '--' addition in d
Hi Martin,
Martin Pitt (2016-08-30):
> Package: netcfg
> Version: 1.139
>
> Hello,
>
> netcfg still configures a "lo" (loopback) device in
> /etc/network/interfaces, although this hasn't been necessary since
> ifupdown 0.7.41 in 2013:
>
>
>
Hi,
Ansgar Burchardt (2016-07-13):
> tag 830894 + moreinfo
> tag 830895 + moreinfo
> tag 830901 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Michael Biebl writes:
> > on a Debian stretch/unstable system using systemd as init system, the
> > initscripts package is no longer required. We asked all
[ Adding kfreebsd and hurd porters to the loop. ]
Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2016-07-05):
> Marco d'Itri <m...@linux.it> (2016-01-08):
> > +# Find out where the runtime dynamic linker and the shared libraries
> > +# can be installed on each architecture: nat
Package: isc-dhcp-client-udeb
Version: 4.3.3-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
(-boot & -bsd in cc.)
Hi,
Your package is no longer installable through the dependency chain
you'll find on e.g. the amd64 graph:
https://d-i.debian.org/dose/graph-unstable-amd64.png
That
Hi,
I've noticed kfreebsd-* are lacking d-i daily builds. Looking on the
porterboxes for both archs, the issue is the following:
| The following packages have unmet dependencies:
| librsvg2-bin : Depends: libgtk-3-0 (>= 3.2.0) but it is not going to be
installed
| wget : Depends: libgnutls30
Nikolaus Rath (2016-03-03):
> It is pretty hard if you're not a DD (and my request for access to a
> guest account is still pending).
I blame my trusting db.debian.org over id/nm.debian.org, sorry about
that.
> Thanks for testing!
No worries.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Nikolaus Rath (2016-03-03):
> On Mar 02 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> >> [...] Can you tell me how to detect
> >> GNU/kFreeBSD from Python? sys.platform and os.uname are potential
> >> candidates, but the Python docs unfortunately don't mention what the
Steven Chamberlain (2016-03-02):
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Please could you check why krb5 has stayed 'Uploaded' for 7d+
> and now 'Installed' yet?
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=krb5
It's in now.
Looking at queued log for the rest, except dak for the last
Steven Chamberlain (2016-02-29):
> Dear wanna-build team,
>
> Please could someone give back cmake for build on kfreebsd and hurd,
> because the (same) test failures seen on those arches' build logs,
> I don't see now in an up-to-date sid chroot on kfreebsd-amd64:
>
> gb
Hi ports people,
I'm not exactly sure what happened with debian-ports@ (I think there
were some planned changes but I don't remember the outcome), so I'm
explicitly sending this to bsd/hurd lists since I suspect the linux
ports are less likely to be affected by this.
We have a bug report with a
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-11-22):
> I rewrote the patches according to KiBi's feedback and they are
> now uploaded to our jessie-kfreebsd suite, and this Git branch:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/log/?h=jessie-kfreebsd
I've cherry-picked 3
Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2015-11-26):
> I've cherry-picked 3 patches from there onto master locally and I'm
> currently running diffoscope to see how that goes (and it's taking
> ages…):
> c182491b05fec16497f2bf1290cac16773d175f9
> 5d59fd1813e794d0821
(Keeping everyone initially x-d-cc'd in the loop.)
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-11-16):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20150422
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
Where's the patch? :p
> The debian-installer package build produces netboot.tar.gz and
> the mini.iso
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-11-17):
> Attached is my jessie-kfreebsd implementation. As I said, it should be
> much cleaner to implement this in sid with newer GNU tar.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Steven Chamberlain
> ste...@pyro.eu.org
> diff --git a/build/Makefile
(Trimming a lot because running out of time.)
Steven Chamberlain (2015-11-17):
> Seems reasonable to factor out and put it here. If we don't, someone
> may add a new $GZIP call later, forget -n and make it unreproducible
> again.
>
> Although it is a macro here, GZIP is
(trimming recipients list a bit)
Christoph Egger (2015-11-10):
> Steven Chamberlain writes:
> > Pretty smart! That's exactly what I did. I often build with
> > `dpkg-buildpackage -g` but somehow never saw this problem before,
> > in sid for example.
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain (2015-11-10):
> Hi Christoph and/or FTP masters,
>
> I made a source+arch:all upload of kfreebsd-10 to the jessie-kfreebsd
> suite. It built on the kfreebsd-amd64 and -i386 buildds, but on -amd64
> it has stayed in Uploaded state, not Installed? Why
-allow="anna
netcfg net-retriever"
| Uploading commands file to ftp.upload.debian.org (incoming: /pub/UploadQueue/)
| Picking DM Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org> with fingerprint
DF4717BA98C27F299BA7183369F30763DFEFC134
|
| You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
Source: hiredis
Version: 0.13.1-1
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
(debian-bsd@lists.debian.org in copy, please follow up with them if you
need help.)
Hi,
Your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-* due to two failing tests
(same on both archs):
| #44
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2015-05-01):
Hello,
(particularly to Steven, I guess)
Is there any specific need for the new grub-installer version
numbering that is currently in git?
grub-installer (1.118+kfreebsd1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Steven Chamberlain ]
* Enable
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2015-04-27):
debian-installer needs a small change to build and work with the new
jessie-kfreebsd suite. debootstrap needs a change also. choose-mirror
and some other d-i packages could be further refined before we decide
to release. (I have it
Jimmy Johnson field.engin...@gmail.com (2015-04-21):
Can the mini.iso be made to work with unetbootin or any of the iso's
for that matter ? I've been trying off and on for month's to get
KFeeBSD installed with no luck.
Don't use unetbootin and just use dd, cat, or cp as advised in the
Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com (2015-04-19):
I know that the kFreeBSD ports are not being officially released
[1]. What plans (if any) have been made for any *un*official releases?
I've just removed the BSD builds from the debian-cd architecture lists
in preparation for next weekend, but I've
Hi people,
here's a second round of unblock/unblock-udeb hints for the upcoming d-i
jessie RC3. Don't hesitate to ask questions if anything looks fishy. Feel
free to age packages if you wish. Also, I've seen the linux upload but I
won't have time to play with until after the mini DebConf in Lyon.
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2015-03-08):
tags 775395 + patch pending
thanks
Hi KiBi,
Could we have the attached fix for partman-zfs in sid please?
This would be an RC bug, except that it is kfreebsd-any.
Sure!
Furthermore, could I step in as maintainer (add myself to
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2015-02-26):
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
No objection on my side, but let's give BSD folks a heads-up since
isc-dhcp-client-udeb depends on bind9's udebs.
Thanks, the changes seem to only relate to authoritative DNS zones
though
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2015-02-18):
package: release.debian.org
user: release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags: unblock
severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Please consider unblocking bind9. It fixes a new security issue.
unblock
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2015-02-18):
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 09:22:25AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2015 at 04:21:25PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On the other hand it also seems wrong for di_exec_shell_log to continue
after the invoked binary exited. I suspect that'd
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2015-02-14):
Michael Gilbert wrote:
Please consider unblocking kfreebsd-10. It fixes 2 security issues:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/kfreebsd-10
When I saw this request come in, I meant to ask one of the
Hi Ivo,
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2015-01-06):
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:25:34PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-12-29):
here's another round I've just compiled, so versions should match
this time. A few of them have (outdated) hints currently
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org (2014-12-19):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package bind9
Fix for RC bug #772610, for some reason no unblock request from
Hi Ivo,
Ivo De Decker iv...@debian.org (2014-12-09):
I added most of those.
thanks!
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:46:35AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
# TODO: Check with Colin
unblock iprutils/2.4.5-1
unblock-udeb iprutils/2.4.5-1
Not added, based on the TODO.
ACK.
# TODO: Check
Ralf Treinen trei...@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr (2014-12-09):
Source: kfreebsd-8
Version: 8.3-6+deb7u1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-uninstallable
Hi, kfreebsd-8 build-depends on gcc-4.6, which does not exist in jessie.
kfreebsd-9 went away during
Hi,
I didn't manage to find time to send this earlier, and some packages
were likely updated in the meanwhile, but here's a list of things I've
prepared a while ago.
--8--8--8--8--
unblock base-installer/1.152
unblock-udeb base-installer/1.152
unblock debootstrap/1.0.66
unblock-udeb
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-09-06):
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05):
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-28):
I've given more thought to this, and I think we should get d-i-n-i
through NEW rather sooner than later (all binary package names get
changed).
There was no hurry AFAICT.
Since there were no 8.x uploads at all during the release cycle, it
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-28):
As long as it's not out of NEW, we can still change our minds.
Still noise and/or work for ftpmasters who are already quite busy.
The main argument in favour of x.0 versioning was the possibility (see
#682656) to co-install versions across
[ Cc: debian-bsd@ ]
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud o...@debian.org (2014-10-27):
Le lundi, 27 octobre 2014, 11.23:23 Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
* kfreebsd-amd64's images fetching logic fails because there is no
un-numbered /netboot/ directory under which we could automagically
take
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-26):
Hi Christoph,
Please could you make this final upload this to unstable, if you have
time before midnight UTC?
If you're trying to beat the clock, make that 1952Z.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-21):
Hi Christoph,
On 20/10/14 23:57, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_kfreebsd-amd64.changes uploaded successfully
to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers_10.1~5_kfreebsd-amd64.deb
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05):
Dear hurd and kfreebsd porters. I plan to upload the attached patch,
which along with the previous upload introduces a bind udeb, which
will be dynamically linked by the dhcp udeb. Please let me know if
this looks ok.
NAK.
+bind9
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05):
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If parallel building worked before you changed things, you get to fix
the issues rather than working around them. bind9 is a pain to build,
so having to deal with a forced -j1 is a nasty
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05):
Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat
easy for porters to test?
Since D-I Jessie Beta 2 is out I can't think of a reason why that
wouldn't be a good idea.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-05):
Until now they have been staged in experimental, pending the release of
d-i Beta 2, because they will update udebs. We will also need to update
the minor version in debian-installer Git for daily d-i builds to still
work. @KiBi: are we at
Hi,
Jessie Beta 2 images have been built and look good to me, so I've
therefore lifted the udeb freeze. The release announce should be
published somewhen this sunday.
debian-cd people: as mentioned on IRC, feel free to sign and put
images into place.
systemd/dbus people: your packages should be
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-02):
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
I've uploaded an nmu fixing the issues revealed by the previous nmu to
delayed/5. Please let me know if I should delay longer. See attached
patch.
The udeb handling is crazy
Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de (2014-09-29):
Am 28.09.2014 um 23:53 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
On 23:34, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
So I propose to change the Debian installer to install the version
agnostic (wonderful word, thanks Christoph) meta-package and let the
dependency resolution
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-28):
Hi,
Please give back efl for another build on kfreebsd-amd64
It apparently timed out during a 'DNS resolution' test, which I tried
but couldn't reproduce locally.
Done.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jan Henke jan.he...@taujhe.de (2014-09-26):
Am 26.09.2014 um 13:59 schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
That would work, except any chroot or jail would install a kernel. I
think, even sbuild running on the buildds would then install a kernel
image and modules inside the build chroot, and that's
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-26):
Hi,
Please give back dime to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386; it
had some autotools issues but seems to build okay for me right now.
Done.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-27):
On 00:54, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-26):
Please give back dime to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386; it
had some autotools issues but seems to build okay for me right now.
Done
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-27):
Please give back consolekit to build on kfreebsd-amd64 and
kfreebsd-i386; it had a kfreebsd-kernel-headers problem (Bug #753773)
which I think was fixed already in 10.0 userland. I was able to
build 0.4.6-5 locally.
Done. debian-wb-team@
Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org (2014-09-17):
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:02:09 -0700
Source: freebsd-utils
Binary: freebsd-utils freebsd-utils-udeb kldutils kldutils-udeb kbdcontrol
kbdcontrol-udeb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 20:47:25 +0200
Source: partman-zfs
Binary: partman-zfs
Architecture: source
Version: 37
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Cyril
[ Dropping -cd@, not a topic for them. ]
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-10):
Sounds good; it feels like a good time for a new release. (Perhaps
biased; I'm keen for the kfreebsd d-i Beta 1 images to go away so
that people are only testing new ones. that work.)
Thanks for
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-12):
Actually, a complex chain of events needs to occur before that happens,
some of it will be out of our control (waiting for a bugfix in a build
dependency), so this likely can't happen for a couple of days. Then it
should have urgency=low to
Hi people,
as you might have seen, a number of uploads happened lately and the d-i
BoF notes from DebConf kindly provided by Steve (thanks!) reminded me
about uploading d-i more often. So I think I'll try and achieve that as
soon as linux 3.16 reaches testing (it was just uploaded to unstable,
Source: qtwebkit
Version: 2.3.2.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-* since the above version
(last success: 2.2.1-7.1), due the following linking error:
| g++ -c -Wall -Wextra
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed a patch in to git, getting rid of the dhcp part;
Philipp, should I upload that and we'll figure out the rdnssd part
another
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org (2014-09-05):
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 09:55:24AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-31):
On 31/08/14 07:00, Philipp Kern wrote:
Is perhaps the same true for stop_rdnssd() on the next line?
So Steven committed
Package: partman-partitioning
Version: 104
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
this package is no longer installable on kfreebsd-* since it depends on
ntfs-3g-udeb; this totally breaks d-i on kfreebsd-* since
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-09-01):
On 31/08/14 20:18, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
kfreebsd-kernel-headers (10.1~1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Update for 10.1
* Add myself to uploaders
This package seems to have disappeared from wanna-build? It was in
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-29):
Please may I commit this patch directly to debian-installer Git?
no objection; did you check with debian-hurd@?
Hopefully it is self-explanatory from the changelog.
Earlier I thought it was modules terminal+gettext that were missing
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-29):
Please may I commit this to d-i/netcfg (assuming my d-i Git privileges
include that repository).
(Yes, we have no per-repository settings that I'm aware of.)
As well as kfreebsd, I expect hurd is currently affected by this bug,
so this
Hi,
so this upgrade breakage hit unstable in March, and testing in April, and it
isn't on anybody's radar yet?!
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2014-07-30):
reassign 756464 freebsd-net-tools
thanks
Hi Dan,
thanks for your bug report, reassigning accordingly.
cheers,
Control: reassign -1 rootskel
Control: affects -1 debian-installer
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-21):
The simple patch for this issue is as follows. It has been tested now
on kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 with varying amounts of available
RAM.
* On kfreebsd, use
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-21):
retitle 758757 kfreebsd-10: d-i bugs caused by qemu-system-i386+kvm
thanks
On 21/08/14 00:23, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Using qemu-system-i386 with the -smp 2 flag, I started seeing weird
issues early in d-i:
It seems more likely this
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-20):
On 14/08/14 18:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Now, I think there are several questions to answer:
1. What were the reasons for having arch-dependent dhcp clients?
I'd speculate because udhcpc from busybox is very small, and
isc-dhcp-client
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-20):
On 14/08/14 18:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...] If a
single extra udeb (or udeb size increase, which happens from time to
time) is going to break kfreebsd-*, it seems to me that their status
is far too brittle.
The fixed-size d-i
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-20):
On 20/08/14 01:49, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
If you're trying to insinuate I/we deliberately broke kfreebsd-* by
introducing partman-iscsi, [...]
No, I was not insinuating that.
But I am still asking: how is it that partman-iscsi
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-20):
But it *is* also relevant here. Each udeb in our image takes up space
for the extracted files, but also I suspect _considerable_ space in
cdebconf data. Addressing this may already fix the ENOSPC error, and if
we can keep the anna excludes
Package: xserver-xorg-video-nv
Version: 1:2.1.20-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
your package needs an update for the transition to xorg-server 1.16
which happened in July.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xserver-xorg-video-nv/news/20140715T163918Z.html
Your
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz (2014-07-15):
Nearer the time, if we still only have a BETA or RC in sid and serious
bugs, we may decide to just stay with 10.0. If a BETA or RC is
*already* in testing, we may want to ask the release time about getting
a pre-approved unblock when the
[ I'm adding -release@ to the loop. I tried to refrain from mentioning
my concerns in the Jessie Beta 1 announce, that's why I used a quite
neutral wording, but let's be honest: kfreebsd-* is looking bad right
now. ]
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-08-14):
Steven Chamberlain ste
Hi,
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-13):
On 13/08/14 18:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
What I'd like to get figured out is what changed between images that
weren't hitting this problem, and the newly published ones.
What changed is dhclient from isc-dhcp-client-udeb gained
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-12):
Except - I'm not sure how heavily systemd is going to feature in d-i
for jessie or jessie+1?
Last I checked we were using busybox init…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140802
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
with a wheezy/amd64/kvm-based setup (hda is ~5GB, RAM is 1GB), the
following images don't work at all, with the following message on vt1:
| /: write failed, filesystem is full
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140802
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
using debian-jessie-DI-b1-kfreebsd-amd64-netinst.iso with a single (kvm)
disc, I can't get past the automatic partioning step due to a failure to
create a swap partition on
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140802
Severity: important
User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
it seems the following warning still hasn't been decided upon (harmless,
should go away; or important, should stay), and it pops up multiple
times:
| Could not get identity of
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-11):
retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
reassign 757711 src:netcfg
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
user debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
usertags 757711 + kfreebsd
thanks
Steve, if you want to
Control: found -1 netcfg/1.117
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-08-11):
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-11):
retitle 757711 netcfg: promptly kills dhclient, deconfigures interface
reassign 757711 src:netcfg
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
Eeww, I
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-12):
found 757711 1.108+deb7u1
thanks
On 11/08/14 23:57, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
found 757711 netcfg/1.118
severity 757711 grave
Eeww, I missed that.
Sorry, assumed you'd seen this... though I did feel the severity was
justified
Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org (2014-07-14):
Source: kfreebsd-10
Severity: important
Hello,
Could you update the clang build dep from 3.3 to 3.4?
It prevents the removal of llvm clang 3.3.
The important part is not 3.3 going away; it's about making sure stuff
still works fine with
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2014-07-10):
On 2014-07-10 12:38, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 10/07/14 09:07, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
That package is not marked as auto-buildable, which means it
doesn't build on
the Debian buildds and thus it can't be binNMUed. So you'll have
Source: owncloud-client
Version: 1.6.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
it looks like owncloud-client no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| Start 27: FolderWatcherTest
| 27/29 Test #27: FolderWatcherTest ***Failed0.08 sec
| * Start testing of
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2014-06-07):
On 02/06/14 20:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
May I ask what was broken on gdm3 and gnome-shell to have caused all
these removals?
Long-standing RC bugs in GDM3 [1], and your choice of making gnome-shell
depend on it.
Combined with Release
1 - 100 of 413 matches
Mail list logo