Hello Debian kFreeBSD folks,
We'll publish a FreeBSD quarterly update in early October for work in
July-September, and I'd be very happy to have a Debian kFreeBSD entry
in there. Please reply to me if you're willing to put one together.
-Ed
-- Forwarded message --
Dear FreeBSD
On 30 June 2015 at 17:17, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Hi!
So I think we may want to build kfreebsd-10 using clang-3.6, to keep
consistency with kfreebsd-11, and so that we rely on fewer clang
releases to be maintained simultaneously in Debian.
Note that upstream FreeBSD 11
On 11 May 2015 at 14:37, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
We were actually able to build our package of the FreeBSD kernel on
GNU/Linux, and the binary would match what we built on GNU/kFreeBSD.
(Which I think is the ultimate in securing against attacks on the
build/development
On 30 September 2014 16:35, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
We need to communicate better the state of kfreebsd and advancements
since wheezy; we haven't done a 'bits' email in a long time. It is
probably in much better state than most people realise.
I'd love see a kFreeBSD
On 20 August 2014 09:38, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Is there someplace to get 'official' upstream 10-STABLE kernels? Mine
are built with Debian's usual config and packaging, and Clang 3.4. Thanks!
You can grab a snapshot build from:
On 20 August 2014 15:56, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Hi,
I've tested for this vt(4) issue in upstream's own kernel build from:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/amd64/10.0-STABLE
and it is affected as well. It is only a problem when using Qemu with
the -enable-kvm
On 22/07/14 19:58, Jan Henke wrote:
I am experiencing a strange problem with the current kFreeBSD weekly
image. Whenever the system is writing to the screen in text mode (e.g.
directly after selecting one entry in GRUB: Copyright) you can
literally watch every single character printed to
On 12 February 2014 09:05, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
There's a small glitch during VT switch: immediately after pressing the
keys, screen is redrawn, but where you'd normally see the login prompt,
blurry characers are drawn. After a fraction of a second, these are replaced
with
On 8 February 2014 08:49, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
Package: kfreebsd-image-11.0-0-amd64
Version: 11.0~svn260666-1
Severity: important
With Newcons it becomes practically impossible to use the console. When
using the default VESA driver, both VT switching and text scrolling
On 19 December 2013 06:33, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
On 19/12/2013 04:21, Ed Maste wrote:
On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling
newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms
On 18 December 2013 19:58, Robert Millan r...@debian.org wrote:
We could also try making it play nice with VTs. Maybe enabling
newcons helps. Also, there's some disabled WIP code in radeonkms
which is aimed at this purpose (I haven't tested it).
Restoring vty switching is one of the benefits
On 16 October 2013 18:57, Sandro Knauß b...@sandroknauss.de wrote:
Hi,
today I got the information, that FreeBSD has a working port for owncloud-
client:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/deskutils/mirall/
This uses the FreeBSD libinotify port, a ktrace-based implementation
of the inotify
This is fixed in stable/9 in r255443. The offending commit was already
reverted from the 9.2 branch prior to 9.2-RC3 for other reasons.
On 10 September 2013 07:31, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
Package: src:kfreebsd-9
Version: 9.2~svn253912-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
On 30 May 2013 07:41, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote:
openjdk-7 has built now on kfreebsd-amd64!
Nice job!
Do you have a link to the patch set? I'm curious about the extent of
the changes, and how much overlap they have with the FreeBSD port
diffs.
-Ed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 09:11:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Nah, I will not work on this. Netlink is Linux specific -- it cannot be
made on the legacy kernels, and I don't care for the legacy kernels
anyway and won't spend time on them.
At the BSDCan conference last month we had some
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:50:25PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote:
fails (panic in swapper) similarly also for me.
Can you add the following options to the kernel config and recompile,
to help track down the problem:
# Compile with kernel debugger related code.
options KDB
# Print a
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:55:54PM +0200, Tuco wrote:
Btw FreeBSD handbook
(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#KERNELDEBUG-OBTAIN)
says dumpon and savecore are needed to save and restore crash dumps so
I ported them and added them to freebsd-utils in case
Same problem. This could be complicated. It appears as FreeBSD
developers haven't tested with recent GCC at all (their last upgrade
was to GCC 4.2).
Yes, FreeBSD is stuck on GCC 4.2.1 for the system compiler right now, as
it is the last GPLv2 version. In general I'd think it's beneficial for
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:16:21PM -0400, Tuco wrote:
I found this problem when running uname inside a 32-bit chroot, 'uname
-m' prints amd64! This often breaks configure scripts and build
systems.
With this glibc patch, uname corrects the output after it has been
obtained with sysctl.
19 matches
Mail list logo
