ted clearly enough to reduce the heat of future flamewars on this
topic. (Wishful thinking, I know)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:40:05PM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> >>>>> "Jimmy" == Jimmy Kaplowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jimmy> I can't find the exact messages for some of these examples of their
> Jimmy> experience, but one
rs and hurt feelings ensue. Since I am not a threads expert, I
personally tried not to make any claims about threads in my post to
Robert beyond citing the statements of other posters who have
demonstrated relevant knowledge or experience.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
section where you write a large portion of a
simplified *NIX-like OS called Weenix. ;-) Here's to hoping I have my
study skills refined by then
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be that Jesux wasn't really meant seriously. Go to the
Jesux home page and click on the word Jesux in the section title "What
is Jesux?". You'll see a real explanation. Given that, it's damn cool.
:-)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to do something more generic in
case there are later other flavors of GNU/NetBSD.
Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Please CC me and retain the
existing CC in all replies, because I and the other Debian GNU/NetBSD
people are by and large not subscribed to the autoconf list.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[
ing, but I will post about those separately. Most of the problems I have
been able to overcome, but I need a bit of advice on one of them. Consider
this my "hi, count me in!" post.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
environment, all without dpkg or apt. It does any debconf
stuff that's required, too (using the noninteractive frontend).
And yes I do mean .debs - the binary kind. Do we have any aptable source
for those yet?
That's more enough for my first substantive email to this list - but see
below t
time to chat,
or while we're working on Debian BSD (unless we're too deeply engrossed).
- Jimmy Kaplowitz (Hydroxide on IRC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at a very preliminary stage.
Thanks for your consideration.
(Please CC me and the debian-bsd mailing list on all replies, even
though I am subscribed to both -bsd and -www.)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References:
1. http://fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html
e pages on working on the website:
> <http://www.debian.org/devel/website/working>
Including me, for instance? :-)
> I guess Josip or some other guy will give you more detailed information
> and anwers :)
OK.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ant Debian's ports to be
together anyway :-)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t you to read all of it, but do read the introduction sections
> and at least skim over the rest. If you have any questions not answered
> there, don't hesitate to ask.
I have now read (most of) the relevant web pages. I look forward to
working on copying the debian-bsd.sf.net site tonight, in a few hours.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it would be useful for better publicity and to make our project seem a
little bit more official.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
luding the ones
pointing
to Matt's tarball, which I think is the simplest way to go right now
(eventually we will want to put everything on Debian's site, IMHO, but
not necessarily yet).
Discuss, discuss. :-)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Andreas
> Schuldei, the poor guy struggling to do OpenBSD all by himself, Jimmy
> Kaplowitz, one of our official DDs and the guy taking care of the website,
> etc.
> Put me in as someone who has contributed nothing but idle chatter so far. :-)
That's a good suggestion, and after
dpkg's arch
> list?"
Good idea, I think it's useful to get listed in dpkg for exactly this
reason. Being on the official Ports page (probably later tonight or
tomorrow) will also help a lot.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ifference from Linux
> is that it uses /var/run/utmpx, and getutent becomes getutxent.
Why these different names, then? I would think that it would help
compatibility with Linux programs to use the non-"x" names. Or is there
another standard that specifies the "x"
es.com (and many other places as well). It's one of
the few stores where, since the products are so inexpensive, sometimes
the shipping is the biggest expense! :-)
(And no, I'm not affiliated with them, I just used them once or twice
back when I had dial-up and was happy with them.)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or something? You
might have to add that to /etc/shells, but that shouldn't be a problem.
(Note: I haven't tested this, but I don't see why it wouldn't work.)
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
il=stratus%40alternex.com.br
You can send me patches at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I can upload them if
they look OK.
- Jimmy Kaplowitz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpFfWlwEcNDf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
21 matches
Mail list logo
